<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>fmpmailinc@aol.com's Comments</title>
    <description>fmpmailinc@aol.com's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1778951/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>A Reuters discussion of the divorce of Continental Resources (CLR -1.2%) CEO Harold Hamm and his ~$11B fortune, and notes Hamm may have to unload a portion of his 68% stake in CLR to raise cash, which could cut his stake to less than 50%. A sale of a large block of CLR shares  likely would send the price down, but if Hamm puts more shares onto the market, investors might eagerly snap them up.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1085242?source=feed#comment-19986672</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19986672</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I would love to buy more at reduced pull back price]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:01:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I would love to buy more at reduced pull back price]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy: New Management And Cheap Valuation On A Strong Resource Base</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1453281/comments?source=feed#comment-19249481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19249481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tim---I like the plan. I have been doing this for several qtr's. However I don't want to go out as far as 2015---so I am doing some Dec. 2013 and 2014 PUTS I consider the premium gained as if it were a dividend... or put the stock on me. I think its a great value at $18.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:36:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tim---I like the plan. I have been doing this for several qtr's. However I don't want to go out as far as 2015---so I am doing some Dec. 2013 and 2014 PUTS I consider the premium gained as if it were a dividend... or put the stock on me. I think its a great value at $18.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy: New Management And Cheap Valuation On A Strong Resource Base</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1453281/comments?source=feed#comment-19120211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19120211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So how far out are you going with the PUT options and at what strike price?  I'm long CHK and believe in the growth of the Company over the next several years, but somewhat leary based on past performance and the fact that much of the company is owned by Ichan et al.  I do not consider these guys to be long term investers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:54:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So how far out are you going with the PUT options and at what strike price?  I'm long CHK and believe in the growth of the Company over the next several years, but somewhat leary based on past performance and the fact that much of the company is owned by Ichan et al.  I do not consider these guys to be long term investers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Continental Resources (CLR) disclosed in February it was committing $95M to an unnamed oil pipeline, but it turns out the pipeline is a $300M project being developed by a partnership controlled by founder Harold Hamm and his family. Directors say the deal was fully vetted to avoid conflicts of interest, but investors are growing increasingly wary of close ties between energy companies and their executives.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1022561?source=feed#comment-18813791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18813791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I suppose it is a good deal for Harold and his family. Read a article in today's paper indicating everything was on the up and up with this particular transaction. However I did note that ONEOK was going to build a similar pipeline but did not find enough folks willing to sign longer term contracts in order to make it profitable for them. I just don't want to see any sweetheart deals done with Hiland to the determent of CLR and its shareholders. If Hiland Resources can provide services at a better value to CLR and their shareholders than anybody else offering the same services then more power to them. However, it is imperative that CLR senior mgt. and the BOD at CLR sign off on any and all of these deals as being non-conflicting with the interest of CLR and its shareholder owners. I'm Long CLR and so far am happy. But I was happy with CHK &amp; SD a while back too and still remember how those Company's CEO's went out of control.  Just want to be cautious]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:24:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I suppose it is a good deal for Harold and his family. Read a article in today's paper indicating everything was on the up and up with this particular transaction. However I did note that ONEOK was going to build a similar pipeline but did not find enough folks willing to sign longer term contracts in order to make it profitable for them. I just don't want to see any sweetheart deals done with Hiland to the determent of CLR and its shareholders. If Hiland Resources can provide services at a better value to CLR and their shareholders than anybody else offering the same services then more power to them. However, it is imperative that CLR senior mgt. and the BOD at CLR sign off on any and all of these deals as being non-conflicting with the interest of CLR and its shareholder owners. I'm Long CLR and so far am happy. But I was happy with CHK &amp; SD a while back too and still remember how those Company's CEO's went out of control.  Just want to be cautious]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Continental Resources (CLR) disclosed in February it was committing $95M to an unnamed oil pipeline, but it turns out the pipeline is a $300M project being developed by a partnership controlled by founder Harold Hamm and his family. Directors say the deal was fully vetted to avoid conflicts of interest, but investors are growing increasingly wary of close ties between energy companies and their executives.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1022561?source=feed#comment-18788991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18788991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[where can I go to review the deal and be sure there is no CHK, SD , funny business going on]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:05:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[where can I go to review the deal and be sure there is no CHK, SD , funny business going on]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Any Rise In Natural Gas Price Will Make This Stock A Strong Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1346811/comments?source=feed#comment-17736321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17736321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bob looks like you will be owning another 10,000 shares of CHK soon]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:12:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bob looks like you will be owning another 10,000 shares of CHK soon]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) -3.8% AH after announcing a public offering of 12M common units. ETP says it will use net proceeds to pay down debt and for general partnership purposes.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/926881?source=feed#comment-17233821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17233821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes, but that 7% dividend sure looks good. Wonder if they are going to be able to keep it??]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes, but that 7% dividend sure looks good. Wonder if they are going to be able to keep it??]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy Needs More Change To Become A Successful Turnaround</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1313561/comments?source=feed#comment-17115351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17115351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Longterm Invester----Very well said. For many months after the attacks on AM began, I kept asking myself as well as others, if AM had done anything illegal, immoral, or unethical in regards to his participation in CHK's founder's well program. Further, it was my understanding that it was a all or none situation in the founders program. In other words he was not able to pick and choose which wells he would participate in---he had to take the bad with the good just like the shareholders.  Aubery's lack of risk aversion is one of the things that made him such a successful &quot;wildcatter&quot;.  I too am in for the long haul with CHK.  Slowly but surely this Nation is developing a energy independence policy that will pay-off well for all parties concerned--CHK, it's investors, and the Country.  No doubt AM had his faults, but he had some pretty good ones as well--and created a good E &amp; P Co.  Unfortunately, the perceived fact that CHK needs money to continue its operations has hurt asset sales.  My dad often said &quot;desperate men do desperate things in desperate situations.  The secret is to avoid the desperation&quot;.  But I do believe CHK will weather this storm as well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:00:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Longterm Invester----Very well said. For many months after the attacks on AM began, I kept asking myself as well as others, if AM had done anything illegal, immoral, or unethical in regards to his participation in CHK's founder's well program. Further, it was my understanding that it was a all or none situation in the founders program. In other words he was not able to pick and choose which wells he would participate in---he had to take the bad with the good just like the shareholders.  Aubery's lack of risk aversion is one of the things that made him such a successful &quot;wildcatter&quot;.  I too am in for the long haul with CHK.  Slowly but surely this Nation is developing a energy independence policy that will pay-off well for all parties concerned--CHK, it's investors, and the Country.  No doubt AM had his faults, but he had some pretty good ones as well--and created a good E &amp; P Co.  Unfortunately, the perceived fact that CHK needs money to continue its operations has hurt asset sales.  My dad often said &quot;desperate men do desperate things in desperate situations.  The secret is to avoid the desperation&quot;.  But I do believe CHK will weather this storm as well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy's (CHK) search for a new CEO to replace Aubrey McClendon is likely to extend beyond the April 1 deadline, Reuters reports. Among factors that may be complicating the search: CHK faces financial and regulatory  headwinds, its financial structure needs to be  simplified, and there's lots of energy firms on  the hunt for a CEO. Meanwhile, McClendon has been meeting with P-E firms about potential new ventures.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/914501?source=feed#comment-16950311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16950311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cssmith Harold.Bell---Amen!! Both of these men are NOT adverse to taking big risks. They have helped a lot of people, and made a lot more healthy, wealthy, and wise. Its amazing the lack of respect they get Talented?? yes. Need to be reined in somewhat---absolutely, but they are not the criminals many on this blog site have made them out to be.<br/> <br/>I just hope the future CEO's selected do as much to create additional wealth]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:52:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cssmith Harold.Bell---Amen!! Both of these men are NOT adverse to taking big risks. They have helped a lot of people, and made a lot more healthy, wealthy, and wise. Its amazing the lack of respect they get Talented?? yes. Need to be reined in somewhat---absolutely, but they are not the criminals many on this blog site have made them out to be.<br/> <br/>I just hope the future CEO's selected do as much to create additional wealth]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Issues Raised By Energy Transfer Partners' Acquisition Of 60% Of ETP Holdco</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1295251/comments?source=feed#comment-16685541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16685541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Equityboy,<br/><br/>I am now completely confused. I concur with PEMINC's follow-up question. Which is better in the short / medium term?? ETP or ETE?  I seem to be leaning toward ETP but I am not sure ---  The whole sum of transactions seem to be a convoluted mess.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:42:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Equityboy,<br/><br/>I am now completely confused. I concur with PEMINC's follow-up question. Which is better in the short / medium term?? ETP or ETE?  I seem to be leaning toward ETP but I am not sure ---  The whole sum of transactions seem to be a convoluted mess.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SandRidge Energy (SD +5.5%) shares are strong as TPG-Axon, agitating for changes at the company including the ouster of CEO&amp;nbsp;Tom Ward, launches a website providing detailed information regarding how SD shareholders may cast their votes in favor of the hedge fund&amp;rsquo;s proposals.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/705331?source=feed#comment-12379181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12379181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is my understanding that Tom Ward invested approximately 500 million of his own money to start Sandridge. Wonder how many of those CEO's at Chevron and Exxon-Mobil can say the same thing? Sure I agree Tom has compensated himself richly, but I'm not sure it's time to throw out the baby with the bathwater. I think Sandridge (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sd' title='SandRidge Energy, Inc.'>SD</a>) could benefit from a shake-up similar to what recently has happened to CHK's Chairman and BOD, but think getting rid of Tom Ward would not be in the best interest of SD or it's share holders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:27:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is my understanding that Tom Ward invested approximately 500 million of his own money to start Sandridge. Wonder how many of those CEO's at Chevron and Exxon-Mobil can say the same thing? Sure I agree Tom has compensated himself richly, but I'm not sure it's time to throw out the baby with the bathwater. I think Sandridge (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sd' title='SandRidge Energy, Inc.'>SD</a>) could benefit from a shake-up similar to what recently has happened to CHK's Chairman and BOD, but think getting rid of Tom Ward would not be in the best interest of SD or it's share holders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analyzing Devon Energy's Financial Debt And Risk</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1025041/comments?source=feed#comment-11901211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11901211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Jeff<br/>great article--Thanks. I have been watching DVN for the last several months and have been less then impressed. Your article puts DVN in a new perspective as far as a long term investor is concerned. I'm sure I will be going long on DVN.<br/><br/>I see where you have done a similar analysis of CHK. Have you performed such an analysis on SD? Will you??]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:41:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jeff<br/>great article--Thanks. I have been watching DVN for the last several months and have been less then impressed. Your article puts DVN in a new perspective as far as a long term investor is concerned. I'm sure I will be going long on DVN.<br/><br/>I see where you have done a similar analysis of CHK. Have you performed such an analysis on SD? Will you??]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Westport Innovations (WPRT -6%) is opened with a Sell rating at Goldman Sachs, seeing downside despite opportunities in natural gas engines due to the Cummins JV that accounts for nearly all of WPRT medium-term profits that's scheduled to terminate in 2021, and high distribution  support requirements that limit normalized profitability for the Heavy Duty franchise.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/647591?source=feed#comment-11333071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11333071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey guys---I have been watching WPRT for sometime now However I don't know how to play it post election. I was feeling pretty bullish about the Co until recently. I understand they have a number of patents in reference to HPDI applications for natural Gas engines and JV or partnerships with Cummings, Cat, and the Chinese. However there seems to be a great deal of volatility in this stock---so how do you really play it and what is a good entry point? At one time I was thinking $30 was a good start, but now feel this stock is going to hover in the low to mid 20;s for awhile. What say you??]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:52:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey guys---I have been watching WPRT for sometime now However I don't know how to play it post election. I was feeling pretty bullish about the Co until recently. I understand they have a number of patents in reference to HPDI applications for natural Gas engines and JV or partnerships with Cummings, Cat, and the Chinese. However there seems to be a great deal of volatility in this stock---so how do you really play it and what is a good entry point? At one time I was thinking $30 was a good start, but now feel this stock is going to hover in the low to mid 20;s for awhile. What say you??]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Going On With Chesapeake?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/981791/comments?source=feed#comment-11284091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11284091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe Aubrey is OK with the BOD. Understand that CHK is Aubrey's creation and it is his baby. I see No friction between the two as well as with the Chairman. CHK is going to be a BIG player in the production of America's energy independence and I'm convinced Aubrey is committed to that fact. I'm sticking with the Company and we are in it for the long haul. Watch what President Romney is going to do with the goal of energy independence. America will get there and CHK will be a major player. I believe the Co is a strong BUY right where it is right now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:05:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe Aubrey is OK with the BOD. Understand that CHK is Aubrey's creation and it is his baby. I see No friction between the two as well as with the Chairman. CHK is going to be a BIG player in the production of America's energy independence and I'm convinced Aubrey is committed to that fact. I'm sticking with the Company and we are in it for the long haul. Watch what President Romney is going to do with the goal of energy independence. America will get there and CHK will be a major player. I believe the Co is a strong BUY right where it is right now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Stock Is Ready To Be Short-Squeezed After The Shale Gas Boom</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/960471/comments?source=feed#comment-11040491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11040491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Energy independence is an absolute necessity and political goal for the US. I believe a Romney Presidency will make it happen. I have always been a supporter of the 'Picken's Plan' and believe we can educate enough of the smart money in this country that they will eventually be dragged kicking and screaming to the realization that not only do we need a energy policy, but MUST BE NON-DEPENDENT on Arab Oil. We MUST become energy independent if the country is to remain any semblance of a Democracy.  None of the Arab states are Americas friend---never have been and never will.  The added benefit is we will not have to ever sacrifice another American soldier to protect the country's energy interest.  I have spoken with enough energy professionals to determine that we can become energy independent within 10 years, per Governor Romney's program, and many say it is doable in as little as 5 years.  Natural gas is a perfect means to accomplish that goal.  Therefore, I am long WPRT and will remain to be so regardless of what the day trader 'shorts' want to do.  I'll buy more as the stock pulls back--because in the long run with it's patents, the Company is a long term winner.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:33:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Energy independence is an absolute necessity and political goal for the US. I believe a Romney Presidency will make it happen. I have always been a supporter of the 'Picken's Plan' and believe we can educate enough of the smart money in this country that they will eventually be dragged kicking and screaming to the realization that not only do we need a energy policy, but MUST BE NON-DEPENDENT on Arab Oil. We MUST become energy independent if the country is to remain any semblance of a Democracy.  None of the Arab states are Americas friend---never have been and never will.  The added benefit is we will not have to ever sacrifice another American soldier to protect the country's energy interest.  I have spoken with enough energy professionals to determine that we can become energy independent within 10 years, per Governor Romney's program, and many say it is doable in as little as 5 years.  Natural gas is a perfect means to accomplish that goal.  Therefore, I am long WPRT and will remain to be so regardless of what the day trader 'shorts' want to do.  I'll buy more as the stock pulls back--because in the long run with it's patents, the Company is a long term winner.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Obama administration delays a decision on whether to prevent a liquefied natural gas export license for Cheniere Energy (LNG), saying it needs more time to review a complaint that an environmental assessment did not go far enough. LNG's Sabine Pass is the only project so far to receive conditional Energy Department approval to export to countries without free-trade agreements.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/591121?source=feed#comment-10634471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10634471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Fact of the matter is---- BO is nothing more than stinky thinking. He is not and never has been for NG. Look at the millions of tax payer $ he has given away to solar &amp; Battery Co's that failed and failed BIG [Solyndra &amp; A123]. Best thing we as the American electorate can do is say it was a BIG mistake---and get rid of him and Send him back to Kenya.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:28:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Fact of the matter is---- BO is nothing more than stinky thinking. He is not and never has been for NG. Look at the millions of tax payer $ he has given away to solar &amp; Battery Co's that failed and failed BIG [Solyndra &amp; A123]. Best thing we as the American electorate can do is say it was a BIG mistake---and get rid of him and Send him back to Kenya.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SandRidge - Don't Overlook This Hot Value Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/900531/comments?source=feed#comment-10099161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10099161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Chris--- I am long SD and have been for a while.  Good article and think you are correct about the Company's growth potential.  I surely will be getting longer this Qtr.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:51:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Chris--- I am long SD and have been for a while.  Good article and think you are correct about the Company's growth potential.  I surely will be getting longer this Qtr.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Chesapeake Energy On Insider Buying, Debt Reduction And Asset Sales</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/890891/comments?source=feed#comment-9990461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9990461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Factzplz----Thank you. I watched the video of the share holders meeting as well, and agree with your summation. I understand NOT why those who are so &quot;down in the mouth&quot; about CHK keep sticking around. If they are so unhappy with the Company--sell your stock and go find a E &amp; P energy Co. you can agree with.---Lord knows there are plenty of those out there.  CHK has got to be a great long term investment.  It's the down in the mouth folks that make this Co a bad trade.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:36:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Factzplz----Thank you. I watched the video of the share holders meeting as well, and agree with your summation. I understand NOT why those who are so &quot;down in the mouth&quot; about CHK keep sticking around. If they are so unhappy with the Company--sell your stock and go find a E &amp; P energy Co. you can agree with.---Lord knows there are plenty of those out there.  CHK has got to be a great long term investment.  It's the down in the mouth folks that make this Co a bad trade.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alternative Ways To Invest In Chesapeake Energy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/877611/comments?source=feed#comment-9820411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9820411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have said for sometime now, that this Country needs an energy policy to get us off OPEC oil COMPLETELY. Sorry guys, but I am Nationalistic enough to believe that if there was sufficient political leadership to that cause, we could do it in less than a decade. I'll take anything we can get in regards to completing this mission. Certainly it may well be easier if the federal government would take the lead, but if they don't let the States do it....and from there the Counties and Cities.  If we would allow the energy companies like CHK, SD, DVN, APA, COP,XOM, etc. do what they do best and provide the hyrdocarbon energy we need.  If the separate states and American cities would commit to using American energy---I think you would see stable and a profitable price in natural Gas that would be beneficial to everybody.  I see no particular good reason for EVERY taxi cab, City Bus, garbage truck, local public works vehicles, etc, etc not being powered by natural gas.  It has already shown to be helpful to city air quality, lower fuel cost, and less maintenance sensitive than gasoline or diesel engines. Immagine that happening in every city of any size in this great country. <br/> <br/>AM bought into this portion of the &quot;Picker's Plan&quot; years ago and still believes in its process.  I know this much---The governor of OK has the vision and we need to expect there will be others in the near to immediate future who will be beating this drum again.  CHK will continue to be a leader in this endevor, but look at this Co as a long term investment---not a day trade.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:26:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have said for sometime now, that this Country needs an energy policy to get us off OPEC oil COMPLETELY. Sorry guys, but I am Nationalistic enough to believe that if there was sufficient political leadership to that cause, we could do it in less than a decade. I'll take anything we can get in regards to completing this mission. Certainly it may well be easier if the federal government would take the lead, but if they don't let the States do it....and from there the Counties and Cities.  If we would allow the energy companies like CHK, SD, DVN, APA, COP,XOM, etc. do what they do best and provide the hyrdocarbon energy we need.  If the separate states and American cities would commit to using American energy---I think you would see stable and a profitable price in natural Gas that would be beneficial to everybody.  I see no particular good reason for EVERY taxi cab, City Bus, garbage truck, local public works vehicles, etc, etc not being powered by natural gas.  It has already shown to be helpful to city air quality, lower fuel cost, and less maintenance sensitive than gasoline or diesel engines. Immagine that happening in every city of any size in this great country. <br/> <br/>AM bought into this portion of the &quot;Picker's Plan&quot; years ago and still believes in its process.  I know this much---The governor of OK has the vision and we need to expect there will be others in the near to immediate future who will be beating this drum again.  CHK will continue to be a leader in this endevor, but look at this Co as a long term investment---not a day trade.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake (CHK +0.6%) hires James Webb as its new, full-time legal counsel as it tries to recover from damaging reports about controversial land deals in Michigan and CEO Aubrey McClendon's personal loans. Webb has been a longtime partner in Oklahoma's largest law firm; maybe he'll know how to tell Aubrey "no."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/550621?source=feed#comment-9719721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9719721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Factzpiz and Bdoeden---Well Spoken. I agree with you 100%. We will see the Phoenix rise again--I'm confident.  Aubrey didn't get to where he is by being risk averse.  I truly believe the next 6 months will prove us correct for sticking with AM.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:28:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Factzpiz and Bdoeden---Well Spoken. I agree with you 100%. We will see the Phoenix rise again--I'm confident.  Aubrey didn't get to where he is by being risk averse.  I truly believe the next 6 months will prove us correct for sticking with AM.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cheniere Energy Investor Day Highlights</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/874331/comments?source=feed#comment-9595571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9595571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ONEWHATSBEENDONEBEFORE--- So give us your formula with LNG strangles on how you are making such large returns--]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:21:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ONEWHATSBEENDONEBEFORE--- So give us your formula with LNG strangles on how you are making such large returns--]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy: Buy Or Sell?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/861401/comments?source=feed#comment-9345721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9345721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good article. There were a number of &quot;traders&quot; out there trying to beat this horse to death. Looks to me that the cream is beginning to rise to the top. I agree with the author--I expect this stock to be in the 30's next year and do not anticipate anybody acquiring the company anytime soon. Currently I'm long the stock and am adding to my position at these levels. All I can say is hang in there Aubrey---and thanks for your vision and plans for the Company.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:24:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good article. There were a number of &quot;traders&quot; out there trying to beat this horse to death. Looks to me that the cream is beginning to rise to the top. I agree with the author--I expect this stock to be in the 30's next year and do not anticipate anybody acquiring the company anytime soon. Currently I'm long the stock and am adding to my position at these levels. All I can say is hang in there Aubrey---and thanks for your vision and plans for the Company.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The latest sign of Chesapeake's (CHK) comeuppance: It's putting up for sale the Fort Worth highrise it bought in 2008 for $104M that symbolized the company's boom times. The building should attract plenty of interest but probably not at the 2008 price; for CHK, getting high prices for its assets is important as it seeks to raise at least $13B this year.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/528751?source=feed#comment-9289441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9289441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Pauliene--I'm with you. This Co and it's stock is not a short term trading instrument. It's an investment. All my homework indicates this stock is on a turn around and well on its way back to the 30's...Maybe this year. I'm hoping for a small pull-back so I can load-up with some more..... and if the election goes our way--look out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:09:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pauliene--I'm with you. This Co and it's stock is not a short term trading instrument. It's an investment. All my homework indicates this stock is on a turn around and well on its way back to the 30's...Maybe this year. I'm hoping for a small pull-back so I can load-up with some more..... and if the election goes our way--look out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CEO Aubrey McClendon says Chesapeake (CHK) expects to announce an asset sale and/or a JV for its Mississippi Lime acreage as part of $11.7B in sales completed or announced by the end of Q3. McClendon also expects to announce a sale of "the vast majority" of its assets in the west Texas Permian Basin. CHK +0.5% premarket.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/524931?source=feed#comment-9156831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9156831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have said all along that Aubrey would land on his feet. A neighbor of mine said along time ago not to &quot;bet against Aubrey&quot;...that CHK was his baby and he would take care of it. Looks like he is well on the road to executing the plan---and no doubt will get it done. I have always thought of CHK as a INVESTMENT rather than a trade. Those of us who are in it for the long haul will reap the rewards of our convictions. Sure there are still some bumps in the road, but in the long run CHK is a winner and will prove to continue to be one.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:31:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have said all along that Aubrey would land on his feet. A neighbor of mine said along time ago not to &quot;bet against Aubrey&quot;...that CHK was his baby and he would take care of it. Looks like he is well on the road to executing the plan---and no doubt will get it done. I have always thought of CHK as a INVESTMENT rather than a trade. Those of us who are in it for the long haul will reap the rewards of our convictions. Sure there are still some bumps in the road, but in the long run CHK is a winner and will prove to continue to be one.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Westport: Alternative Engines Can Power Your Portfolio Higher</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/720211/comments?source=feed#comment-7531091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7531091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Outstanding Article on Westport. I am a believer in NAT Gas being a BIG player in our future of energy independence. I believe there is far more support for NG from Romney vs. BO. I Read another article today in the newspaper referencing the coming of home based NG re-fueling machines. They are expensive (about $5,000 a copy) now but should come way down as the various mfg. bring then to market. <br/> <br/>I'm still in hopes that congress will embrace T. Boone Picken;s idea of the government going ahead and taxing NG at a higher rate for the first 5-7 years in order to pay for tax incentives designed to encourage the use of NG as a transportation fuel NOW.  The tax incentives will be limited to about 3-years in the form of a tax credit or tax deduction.  It sure would help and speed up the energy independence process.<br/> <br/>I'm long WPRT, CLNE, and getting longer with the dips.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:43:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Outstanding Article on Westport. I am a believer in NAT Gas being a BIG player in our future of energy independence. I believe there is far more support for NG from Romney vs. BO. I Read another article today in the newspaper referencing the coming of home based NG re-fueling machines. They are expensive (about $5,000 a copy) now but should come way down as the various mfg. bring then to market. <br/> <br/>I'm still in hopes that congress will embrace T. Boone Picken;s idea of the government going ahead and taxing NG at a higher rate for the first 5-7 years in order to pay for tax incentives designed to encourage the use of NG as a transportation fuel NOW.  The tax incentives will be limited to about 3-years in the form of a tax credit or tax deduction.  It sure would help and speed up the energy independence process.<br/> <br/>I'm long WPRT, CLNE, and getting longer with the dips.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy Has 75% Upside Once CEO Leaves</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/717041/comments?source=feed#comment-7314141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7314141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[At $100 / SH--I'm in. What a turn around that would be<br/><br/>As for the $100mm law suit, CHK is appealing the judges ruling which seems likely to be overturned. Seem the contracts were NOT fully completed and executed. It's another issue of the sellers not doing their due diligence as far as ownership of the mineral rights.<br/><br/>I have said on several occasions that AM is known as one of the best oil &amp; gas executives in the country. Sure he has a tendency to be a loose cannon from time to time, but it is the nature of the wildcatter beast. He has done nothing illegal as far as I can tell. I truly believe he will continue to gain and have the support of the new BOD and will turn this Co. around in a very profitable way. I'm staying long CHK ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:03:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[At $100 / SH--I'm in. What a turn around that would be<br/><br/>As for the $100mm law suit, CHK is appealing the judges ruling which seems likely to be overturned. Seem the contracts were NOT fully completed and executed. It's another issue of the sellers not doing their due diligence as far as ownership of the mineral rights.<br/><br/>I have said on several occasions that AM is known as one of the best oil &amp; gas executives in the country. Sure he has a tendency to be a loose cannon from time to time, but it is the nature of the wildcatter beast. He has done nothing illegal as far as I can tell. I truly believe he will continue to gain and have the support of the new BOD and will turn this Co. around in a very profitable way. I'm staying long CHK ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Chesapeake Needs To Dump CEO Aubrey McClendon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/683231/comments?source=feed#comment-6813781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6813781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have been a fan of AM throughout the reporting of this mess beginning in mid-April---until now. Further I don't believe Reuters has just now discovered these e-mail that smell of collusion with Encana and CHK.  I too agree with the majority and the author--looks like its time for AM to go.  Sure--pay him as a consultant, but the BOD have got to consider the immediate future of the Co.  Still believe the value of the assets of the Co. are greater than the price the stock is trading at now.  I'm currently long CHK and intend for the near term to remain so.  We need to give this Board a chance to settle in and lead]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:56:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have been a fan of AM throughout the reporting of this mess beginning in mid-April---until now. Further I don't believe Reuters has just now discovered these e-mail that smell of collusion with Encana and CHK.  I too agree with the majority and the author--looks like its time for AM to go.  Sure--pay him as a consultant, but the BOD have got to consider the immediate future of the Co.  Still believe the value of the assets of the Co. are greater than the price the stock is trading at now.  I'm currently long CHK and intend for the near term to remain so.  We need to give this Board a chance to settle in and lead]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Chesapeake (CHK -5.4%) opens trading as the S&amp;amp;P's biggest loser after a report of alleged bid rigging by CHK and Encana (ECA -3.2%), plus a story that J.P. Morgan declined to do loan business with CHK for more than 10 years because of credit quality, while Goldman Sachs took the business. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/383711?source=feed#comment-6767571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6767571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have occasionally wondered if Routers had it in for AM--The peddling of this news is suspect]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:57:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have occasionally wondered if Routers had it in for AM--The peddling of this news is suspect]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake: A Lucrative Buy At $18</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/668741/comments?source=feed#comment-6594961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6594961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't understand why you continually compare CHK to Enron. There is NO comparison here.. <br/><br/>There is a publicly traded Company out there that is doing quite well in the energy sector, and is a off-shoot of Enron. EOG energy was formerly known as Enron Oil &amp; Gas.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:06:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't understand why you continually compare CHK to Enron. There is NO comparison here.. <br/><br/>There is a publicly traded Company out there that is doing quite well in the energy sector, and is a off-shoot of Enron. EOG energy was formerly known as Enron Oil &amp; Gas.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cheniere Energy Licensed To Liquefy, Has Contracts, Now Needs Money</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/667951/comments?source=feed#comment-6574361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6574361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good Report. I was about to say the area where LNG should shine is the fact that NG is sooooo cheap in the US---and we have enough to be the Saudi Arabia of the world with NG.<br/> <br/>Do you think there is a play here with gas storage while LNG is building their facility--such as PAA?  2014-2015 seems a long way out in this goofy market]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:21:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good Report. I was about to say the area where LNG should shine is the fact that NG is sooooo cheap in the US---and we have enough to be the Saudi Arabia of the world with NG.<br/> <br/>Do you think there is a play here with gas storage while LNG is building their facility--such as PAA?  2014-2015 seems a long way out in this goofy market]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
