Seeking Alpha

muley101 » Comments » FRE

  • Fannie and Freddie Did Not Cause This Crisis [View article]
    Here's how we get out of this:
    Plan B: The Mortgage Investment Bill
    for Reviving the Economy

    by Stan Muse

    The Federal Reserve is out of Federal Funds rate options and now the Congress is about to pass legislation which will be the largest bailout bill in the history of the world. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now penny stocks with perhaps over 1000 bank failures yet to come. The American taxpayer will be told that they and their children will be writing big checks to rescue the Wall Street crooks and congressmen that caused all the problems, while receiving nothing in return.

    Anyone who has been following recent congressional hearings knows by now that this is unacceptable to Main Street, the voters who will be firing their congressmen for turning the USA into a socialist country. It is also widely believed that this bailout bill may not be embraced by Wall Street because of its onerous terms even if passed. Finally, it will not provide sufficient liquidity for improving the rest of the economy.

    A much more effective and fairer way to end our economic crisis is easily attainable. To state it simply, all Congress has to do is to pass a Mortgage Investment bill which allows individuals a one-time option to use some of the funds in their IRAs to pay off their mortgage balance in full, without any penalty, interest, or taxes for doing so. In return, individuals choosing to exercise this option give up their mortgage interest tax deduction for life. This bill could be passed quickly and independently of any other economy-related legislation currently being debated, or included in the current bill. Individuals choosing this option would need sufficient IRA funds to pay mortgage balance in full. The actual payment to the individual’s mortgage company would be done by the IRA managing institution to avoid fraud.

    As one senator recently stated, ‘for most people their home is their IRA’. For many others, their 401-K plans hold many trillions of dollars, much of which by now is parked in money market funds or T-bills as mine is. If these IRA funds could be released to pay off mortgages, we could possibly avert, or at least significantly shorten, the economic recession we now find ourselves in. In fact, no other bailout legislation may even be necessary, although more regulatory legislation is certainly needed.

    I asked Allan Meltzer, Arthur Segel, and Ellen Zentner to review this proposal and received some positive responses. Ellen said it seemed to be fool-proof and better than a reverse mortgage. In fact, it is a no-brainer for the homeowner with a large 401-K balance, and for the government. The only people who might object, as Ellen stated, are the bankers who want to keep homeowners dependant on them, especially those in the upper-income group. But even the bankers can not want the government to own a large stake in their business for a multitude of reasons.

    It makes sense to allow people to use their IRA money, which they earned, to invest in the best and safest investment they could ever make, their home. Presumably they will need a place to live in retirement on a fixed income. It makes no sense for someone with more than enough IRA funds to cover their mortgage balance to loose their home because they lost their job and can not pay their mortgage. It also makes sense because it is not some form of government bailout which rewards the bad behavior of mortgage companies and unqualified borrowers. Instead, it rewards the good behavior of those who have saved and invested in the economy

    If only 5 million people chose this option, for an average of only $200,000 each, the result would be $1 Trillion in paid-off mortgages, providing liquidity to the mortgage industry. By executing the option, an individual’s annual mortgage payment would become disposable income to put back into the economy or back into IRA accounts. To the individual, the effect is the same as lowering taxes. If only 5 Million people were able to put back $20,000 per year into the economy, the result would be a $100 Billion per year stimulus package for many years to come.

    In my case, with $800K in IRAs and a secure pension, I would increase disposable income by $1600 per month while reducing the IRA balance by only $160K, but saving over $120K in future interest payments. I could retire, which I can not afford to now, and leave my six figure job to someone else. I could also quickly replenish the IRA money used to pay off my mortgage with the extra income.

    Adding a further provision to delay receiving Social Security payments for a year in order to exercise the option would be a baby step towards privatization of Social Security. Anyone financially able to exercise the option should be able to delay the payments. For every 5 million people choosing the option, approximately $100 Billion would remain in the Social Security fund. This could fix our problems with Social Security for good.

    Some of the benefits of this plan would be to:

    • Immediately increase an individual’s or married couple’s disposable income by tens of thousands of dollars each year while enabling them to become debt free, helping families to stay together
    • Save homeowners hundreds of thousands of dollars in mortgage interest payments
    • Encourage individual IRA savings by many who have never saved
    • Allow many people to retire earlier than they otherwise could
    • Create demand for housing, reducing inventory, and stopping the decline in home prices
    • Stimulate the overall economy, creating and saving jobs
    • Not cost the government anything, and actually Increase federal, state, and local tax revenues by eliminating individual mortgage interest tax deductions, without raising tax rates
    • Force the banks to sell their good loan assets to cover their bad loan losses, instead of forcing the taxpayer to buy their worst loans, and increase liquidity for new loans to those who need them
    • Allow the free market economy to work through the crisis rather than resorting to socialism
    • Not increase the national debt nor the money supply as a bailout would do and contribute to inflation
    • Allow the individual home owner to the freedom to become their own banker with the money they earn, reducing America’s dependence on bankers, and changing America from renters and borrowers to homeowners and savers


    The merits of this simple plan, the Mortgage Investment bill, for saving the economy, instead of trillions of dollars for a Wall Street bailout which will socialize the finance industry, are obvious and would benefit everyone involved. The individual gets more disposable income and a chance to live debt free, the capital markets get needed liquidity, the government collects more taxes and collects them sooner at the expense of the bankers, the housing market gets more demand, and the general economy gets a much needed boost for the next few years.

    Democrats should like this plan because they can claim that it lets the wealthy pay for this mess. Republicans should like it because it increases disposable income, which has the same effect the same lowering taxes. The average voter should like it because it addresses all segments of the economy with a huge economic stimulus package, not just Wall Street, and costs nothing while helping to pay off the national debt and potentially fixing Social Security.


    Oct 06 22:18 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Fannie and Freddie Did Not Cause This Crisis [View article]
    Socialism forced on capitalism caused most of the problems. Managing the business quarter to quarter caused the rest.
    Oct 06 22:16 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The Facts Behind the Coming Congressional Mortgage Bailout Bill [View article]
    Plan B: The Mortgage Investment Bill
    for Reviving the Economy

    by Stan Muse

    The Federal Reserve is out of Federal Funds rate options and now the Congress is about to pass legislation which will be the largest bailout bill in the history of the world. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now penny stocks with perhaps over 1000 bank failures yet to come. The American taxpayer will be told that they and their children will be writing big checks to rescue the Wall Street crooks and congressmen that caused all the problems, while receiving nothing in return.

    Anyone who has been following recent congressional hearings knows by now that this is unacceptable to Main Street, the voters who will be firing their congressmen for turning the USA into a socialist country. It is also widely believed that this bailout bill may not be embraced by Wall Street because of its onerous terms even if passed. Finally, it will not provide sufficient liquidity for improving the rest of the economy.

    A much more effective and fairer way to end our economic crisis is easily attainable. To state it simply, all Congress has to do is to pass a Mortgage Investment bill which allows individuals a one-time option to use some of the funds in their IRAs to pay off their mortgage balance in full, without any penalty, interest, or taxes for doing so. In return, individuals choosing to exercise this option give up their mortgage interest tax deduction for life. This bill could be passed quickly and independently of any other economy-related legislation currently being debated, or included in the current bill. Individuals choosing this option would need sufficient IRA funds to pay mortgage balance in full. The actual payment to the individual’s mortgage company would be done by the IRA managing institution to avoid fraud.

    As one senator recently stated, ‘for most people their home is their IRA’. For many others, their 401-K plans hold many trillions of dollars, much of which by now is parked in money market funds or T-bills as mine is. If these IRA funds could be released to pay off mortgages, we could possibly avert, or at least significantly shorten, the economic recession we now find ourselves in. In fact, no other bailout legislation may even be necessary, although more regulatory legislation is certainly needed.

    I asked Allan Meltzer, Arthur Segel, and Ellen Zentner to review this proposal and received some positive responses. Ellen said it seemed to be fool-proof and better than a reverse mortgage. In fact, it is a no-brainer for the homeowner with a large 401-K balance, and for the government. The only people who might object, as Ellen stated, are the bankers who want to keep homeowners dependant on them, especially those in the upper-income group. But even the bankers can not want the government to own a large stake in their business for a multitude of reasons.

    It makes sense to allow people to use their IRA money, which they earned, to invest in the best and safest investment they could ever make, their home. Presumably they will need a place to live in retirement on a fixed income. It makes no sense for someone with more than enough IRA funds to cover their mortgage balance to loose their home because they lost their job and can not pay their mortgage. It also makes sense because it is not some form of government bailout which rewards the bad behavior of mortgage companies and unqualified borrowers. Instead, it rewards the good behavior of those who have saved and invested in the economy

    If only 5 million people chose this option, for an average of only $200,000 each, the result would be $1 Trillion in paid-off mortgages, providing liquidity to the mortgage industry. By executing the option, an individual’s annual mortgage payment would become disposable income to put back into the economy or back into IRA accounts. To the individual, the effect is the same as lowering taxes. If only 5 Million people were able to put back $20,000 per year into the economy, the result would be a $100 Billion per year stimulus package for many years to come.

    In my case, with $800K in IRAs and a secure pension, I would increase disposable income by $1600 per month while reducing the IRA balance by only $160K, but saving over $120K in future interest payments. I could retire, which I can not afford to now, and leave my six figure job to someone else. I could also quickly replenish the IRA money used to pay off my mortgage with the extra income.

    Adding a further provision to delay receiving Social Security payments for a year in order to exercise the option would be a baby step towards privatization of Social Security. Anyone financially able to exercise the option should be able to delay the payments. For every 5 million people choosing the option, approximately $100 Billion would remain in the Social Security fund. This could fix our problems with Social Security for good.

    Some of the benefits of this plan would be to:

    • Immediately increase an individual’s or married couple’s disposable income by tens of thousands of dollars each year while enabling them to become debt free, helping families to stay together
    • Save homeowners hundreds of thousands of dollars in mortgage interest payments
    • Encourage individual IRA savings by many who have never saved
    • Allow many people to retire earlier than they otherwise could
    • Create demand for housing, reducing inventory, and stopping the decline in home prices
    • Stimulate the overall economy, creating and saving jobs
    • Not cost the government anything, and actually Increase federal, state, and local tax revenues by eliminating individual mortgage interest tax deductions, without raising tax rates
    • Force the banks to sell their good loan assets to cover their bad loan losses, instead of forcing the taxpayer to buy their worst loans, and increase liquidity for new loans to those who need them
    • Allow the free market economy to work through the crisis rather than resorting to socialism
    • Not increase the national debt nor the money supply as a bailout would do and contribute to inflation
    • Allow the individual home owner to the freedom to become their own banker with the money they earn, reducing America’s dependence on bankers, and changing America from renters and borrowers to homeowners and savers


    The merits of this simple plan, the Mortgage Investment bill, for saving the economy, instead of trillions of dollars for a Wall Street bailout which will socialize the finance industry, are obvious and would benefit everyone involved. The individual gets more disposable income and a chance to live debt free, the capital markets get needed liquidity, the government collects more taxes and collects them sooner at the expense of the bankers, the housing market gets more demand, and the general economy gets a much needed boost for the next few years.

    Democrats should like this plan because they can claim that it lets the wealthy pay for this mess. Republicans should like it because it increases disposable income, which has the same effect the same lowering taxes. The average voter should like it because it addresses all segments of the economy with a huge economic stimulus package, not just Wall Street, and costs nothing while helping to pay off the national debt and potentially fixing Social Security.
    Oct 01 22:37 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Bill Gross Softens His Fannie/Freddie Rhetoric [View article]
    The GSEs should be treated like any other government give away program. Their mission borders on socialism and the stockholders should not be devistated for supporting them. They should either be funded without having to sell preferred shares or paying the feds back, or they should be terminated.
    Aug 18 08:52 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Option ARMs, Who Thought Up these Time Bombs? [View article]
    Wake up and smell the liberals. The whole subprime fiasco is just another way to redistribute your income to the 'underpriviliged', because you have plenty of money.

    As John Voigt says, 'If, God forbid, we live to see Mr. Obama president, we will live through a socialist era that America has not seen before, and our country will be weakened in every way.'
    Aug 14 08:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How Should The Federal Government Help Homeowners? [Housing Tracker] [View article]
    The government wants ignore the fact that there is a large segment of the population who should never own a home. They are just not responsible enough. Many are just not financially intelligent enough to establish a budget that allows them to pay their loan. And, many see an opportunity to incorporate all of their debt into one low interest mortgage payment - which they can not afford either. We need to establish minimal national mortgage qualification standards which all mortgage issuers must adhere to, or their loan is invalid. We also need to establish national fixed rates for mortgages and do away with balooning mortgages.
    Aug 04 08:18 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Is the U.S. Banking System Safe?  [View article]
    Great Article. It looks like the ultimate perfect storm. Just a few obstacles to overcome and we're in the clear:

    1) Banking Crisis Growing, will be here for at least a decade
    2) Soaring Price of Oil - Boone says largest transfer of wealth ever
    3) Global Warming - food crisis looming, more national weather disasters to come, no more trailers from FEMA
    4) Deflation in housing/Inflation in everything else
    5) No Liquidity for new loans to drive the economy
    6) 8 years of a fool for a President - America's reputation tarnished
    7) Soaring National Debt
    8) Never-ending War
    9) Soaring Health Care costs
    10) Iran, N.Korea going 'NUKULARE'

    Other than that everything os A-OK
    Aug 03 21:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Yes, There Is a Credit Crunch [View article]
    There is only one source of funds that can get us out of this credit crunch, which is very real. That source is our IRA funds. Mine is all parked in cash until the market is well into a turn-around. I have written 2 articles on how we could put that money to work and save the economy while helping to relieve the credit crunch and helping the responsible home owners.

    Thearticles are on SA at:

    seekingalpha.com/artic...

    and

    seekingalpha.com/artic...

    I have sent the idea to several senators but it has fallen on deaf ears. The banks are not interested in people being able to finance their own home loans and being their own bankers, which translates into fewer campaign contributions. The congress would rather just redistribute the income and squander the savings of responsible wage earners.

    If you agree with my idea, please send it to your congressmen.
    Jul 28 19:07 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • SEC Shorting Restrictions: Are Some Banks Being Set Up? [View article]
    Thanks for this article. Now I know why my usual day trading strategy for WM was not working today. They were not moving with the rest of the pack as indicated by the RKH and XLF ETFs.
    Jul 17 16:39 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Morgan Stanley Makes Lehmanade - Fast Money Recap (6/30/08) [View article]
    I would not buy financials until the XLF has retraced back above $28. Even then I would be cautious.
    Jul 01 12:24 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Fannie Mae: What if the Lifeguard Can't Swim? [View article]
    How can Senators Dodd and Shelby possibly survive their next election ? These two morons have been asleep at the wheel for years. They are to blame as much as any of the incompetent CFOs that have been fired from the finance industry. Someone should write an article on their complicity with the mortgage crisis.
    Jun 16 20:24 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on FRE by muley101
muley101's
Comments Stats
188 comments
Rating: 0 (4 - 4 )