User 182177's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/182177/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/120538-the-economy-how-to-tell-when-it-s-improving?source=feed#comment-387618 387618
======================...

There are 3 groups of economic indicators:

Leading indicators.
Coincident indicators
Lagging indicators.]]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:10:45 -0500
======================...

There are 3 groups of economic indicators:

Leading indicators.
Coincident indicators
Lagging indicators.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/103636-more-downside-ahead-for-solar-barclay-s?source=feed#comment-297532 297532
blogs.barrons.com/tech...]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:16:30 -0500
blogs.barrons.com/tech...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/103636-more-downside-ahead-for-solar-barclay-s?source=feed#comment-297351 297351 Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:22:15 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/97850-solar-stocks-take-drubbing-on-report-congess-won-t-extend-investment-tax-credit?source=feed#comment-270718 270718
www.reuters.com/articl...

Hope it will pass and sign into law. If that happens, solar stocks should do well in the next 12 months.]]> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:30:48 -0400
www.reuters.com/articl...

Hope it will pass and sign into law. If that happens, solar stocks should do well in the next 12 months.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/97850-solar-stocks-take-drubbing-on-report-congess-won-t-extend-investment-tax-credit?source=feed#comment-270173 270173
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/fi...]]> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:07:18 -0400
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/fi...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85625-canadian-solar-opportunity-in-multiple-contraction-from-dilution?source=feed#comment-209321 209321
blogs.barrons.com/tech.../]]> Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:25:48 -0400
blogs.barrons.com/tech.../]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85625-canadian-solar-opportunity-in-multiple-contraction-from-dilution?source=feed#comment-209165 209165
The author likes the stock, and he is buying the stock. When the options buyer exercises the option, the author will have bought the CSIQ - but at a few dollars less than $35 (because the author collected the "Put Option's Premium". ]]> Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:54:14 -0400
The author likes the stock, and he is buying the stock. When the options buyer exercises the option, the author will have bought the CSIQ - but at a few dollars less than $35 (because the author collected the "Put Option's Premium". ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85625-canadian-solar-opportunity-in-multiple-contraction-from-dilution?source=feed#comment-209152 209152 ======================...

Disclosure (by author): I wrote $35 puts for July.
That means the author is buying.
----------------------...

"Wrote $35 purts" means he sold $35 put options.

There is a well-known strategy: "When one likes a particular stock, one sells 'put' option of that stock".

Note: Personally, I don't do any options. But I do know a little bit about options.
]]> Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:37:12 -0400 ======================...

Disclosure (by author): I wrote $35 puts for July.
That means the author is buying.
----------------------...

"Wrote $35 purts" means he sold $35 put options.

There is a well-known strategy: "When one likes a particular stock, one sells 'put' option of that stock".

Note: Personally, I don't do any options. But I do know a little bit about options.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85205-solarfun-power-the-next-solar-giant?source=feed#comment-207441 207441
CSIQ:
bigcharts.marketwatch....

SOLF:
bigcharts.marketwatch....]]> Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:02:27 -0400
CSIQ:
bigcharts.marketwatch....

SOLF:
bigcharts.marketwatch....]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85205-solarfun-power-the-next-solar-giant?source=feed#comment-207422 207422
Which stock appears to go nowhere? And is only slightly above its year-ago price?

If you want something "cheap" and something appears to be a "bargain", SOLF is the way to go. (90% of market players will take this route.)

If you want to go with something that is "strong" - sorry, it is very "expensive" and you just have to pay up to get it, CSIQ. (Less than 10% market players will take this route.)
======================...

bigcharts.marketwatch....=

bigcharts.marketwatch....=

]]> Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:27:15 -0400
Which stock appears to go nowhere? And is only slightly above its year-ago price?

If you want something "cheap" and something appears to be a "bargain", SOLF is the way to go. (90% of market players will take this route.)

If you want to go with something that is "strong" - sorry, it is very "expensive" and you just have to pay up to get it, CSIQ. (Less than 10% market players will take this route.)
======================...

bigcharts.marketwatch....=

bigcharts.marketwatch....=

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/85205-solarfun-power-the-next-solar-giant?source=feed#comment-207143 207143
Despite Dr. Jack Yetiv's lengthy discussion of CSIQ that uncovered this gem, and his numerous comments (on CSIQ) under other solar articles, CSIQ remains under the radar apparently - it is a good thing.]]> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:33:09 -0400
Despite Dr. Jack Yetiv's lengthy discussion of CSIQ that uncovered this gem, and his numerous comments (on CSIQ) under other solar articles, CSIQ remains under the radar apparently - it is a good thing.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84830-canadian-solar-the-next-solar-takeover-target?source=feed#comment-205506 205506
I can not be the only one. I'll leave this to those, who are wiser and have more experience than me, to comment on this.

(Actually, a few of my friends and I have expected this to happen quite a while ago - we just didn't know "when". Each one of us has already got "a plan" and ready to go.)
]]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:57:37 -0400
I can not be the only one. I'll leave this to those, who are wiser and have more experience than me, to comment on this.

(Actually, a few of my friends and I have expected this to happen quite a while ago - we just didn't know "when". Each one of us has already got "a plan" and ready to go.)
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84830-canadian-solar-the-next-solar-takeover-target?source=feed#comment-205449 205449
It is music to the ears to CSIQ long-term investors that SPWR & STP will not buy CSIQ. CSIQ will be able to appreciate far more as an independent company. No CSIQ long-term investors will want this to happen -- turning a Performance King into a Performance Dog.

stockcharts.com/charts...]]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:33:30 -0400
It is music to the ears to CSIQ long-term investors that SPWR & STP will not buy CSIQ. CSIQ will be able to appreciate far more as an independent company. No CSIQ long-term investors will want this to happen -- turning a Performance King into a Performance Dog.

stockcharts.com/charts...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84830-canadian-solar-the-next-solar-takeover-target?source=feed#comment-205438 205438
Thus, CSIQ long-term investors have a lot to celebrate for, due to these insightful opinions. Because if CSIQ is acquired by any one of these companies, the "Performance King" will just turn into a "Performance Dog" overnight.
]]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:19:55 -0400
Thus, CSIQ long-term investors have a lot to celebrate for, due to these insightful opinions. Because if CSIQ is acquired by any one of these companies, the "Performance King" will just turn into a "Performance Dog" overnight.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84830-canadian-solar-the-next-solar-takeover-target?source=feed#comment-204970 204970
stockcharts.com/charts...]]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:08:21 -0400
stockcharts.com/charts...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84830-canadian-solar-the-next-solar-takeover-target?source=feed#comment-204955 204955
Hope it will not happen.]]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:21:31 -0400
Hope it will not happen.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84616-ldk-solar-forecasting-sunny-skies-in-q2-earnings?source=feed#comment-203943 203943
"CSIQ will beat the estimate all the way to next year. Do your own research.

Long CSIQ."
======================...

I agree with your assessment in the fundamental aspects of CSIQ that it will beat the revenue and earning's estimates for at least the next two years. There are four underpinning driving forces in favor of the solar sector in general, but have yet to come into play: (1) Expected decline in Poly-Si prices. (2) The ITC or PTC for renewable energy will become the law of this land (USA) - if not this Bush's administration, it will be the next. (3) The potential decline of ASP of PV products that will cause the exponential rise in demand. (4) The sure increases in the electricity rates across all regions over time will further fuel the demand for solar systems.

The solar sector is the most promising one in all sectors in terms of growth prospects. And the CSIQ is the strongest stock in this sector. There is one school of thoughts that says to invest in the strongest stock of the strongest sector.
]]> Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:22:01 -0400
"CSIQ will beat the estimate all the way to next year. Do your own research.

Long CSIQ."
======================...

I agree with your assessment in the fundamental aspects of CSIQ that it will beat the revenue and earning's estimates for at least the next two years. There are four underpinning driving forces in favor of the solar sector in general, but have yet to come into play: (1) Expected decline in Poly-Si prices. (2) The ITC or PTC for renewable energy will become the law of this land (USA) - if not this Bush's administration, it will be the next. (3) The potential decline of ASP of PV products that will cause the exponential rise in demand. (4) The sure increases in the electricity rates across all regions over time will further fuel the demand for solar systems.

The solar sector is the most promising one in all sectors in terms of growth prospects. And the CSIQ is the strongest stock in this sector. There is one school of thoughts that says to invest in the strongest stock of the strongest sector.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/84404-temporary-market-bottom-3-solar-stocks-that-look-like-bargains?source=feed#comment-203500 203500 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:28:31 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/81879-a-missed-opportunity-in-canadian-solar?source=feed#comment-194211 194211
You wrote and I quote: "up more than 300% since I first bought it". Good for you. I also did not know that you had written a research article that mentioned CSIQ too.

I bought CSIQ after reading Dr. Yetiv's article, and I also bought TSL after reading his article as well.

As it turned out that CSIQ is a real gem, while TSL is a lemon, so far at least. One has to look at the future, so I decided to get rid of the weak one (TSL) and then use that money to beef up the strong one (CSIQ).

I might add that I have made far more money from CSIQ than the money I lost on TSL.
]]> Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:27:55 -0400
You wrote and I quote: "up more than 300% since I first bought it". Good for you. I also did not know that you had written a research article that mentioned CSIQ too.

I bought CSIQ after reading Dr. Yetiv's article, and I also bought TSL after reading his article as well.

As it turned out that CSIQ is a real gem, while TSL is a lemon, so far at least. One has to look at the future, so I decided to get rid of the weak one (TSL) and then use that money to beef up the strong one (CSIQ).

I might add that I have made far more money from CSIQ than the money I lost on TSL.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/81879-a-missed-opportunity-in-canadian-solar?source=feed#comment-193640 193640
CSIQ is your only solar stock, good for you.

I sold my TSL today, and beefed up on CSIQ -- choosing to hang my hat on STRENGTH. I see CSIQ is a real gem which was uncovered by Dr. Yetiv.

True, CSIQ was down big today (6-26-08), closed at 42.89 down 2.35 (or 5.19%). Over a one-year period, CSIQ still out-performs any other solar stock.
]]> Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:19:11 -0400
CSIQ is your only solar stock, good for you.

I sold my TSL today, and beefed up on CSIQ -- choosing to hang my hat on STRENGTH. I see CSIQ is a real gem which was uncovered by Dr. Yetiv.

True, CSIQ was down big today (6-26-08), closed at 42.89 down 2.35 (or 5.19%). Over a one-year period, CSIQ still out-performs any other solar stock.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/82310-confessions-of-a-shallow-solar-trader?source=feed#comment-191415 191415 Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:17:33 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/82310-confessions-of-a-shallow-solar-trader?source=feed#comment-191412 191412 ======================...

Steve: You are luckier than me. I am a slow reader, it wasted me twice as much time.

I see nothing of value but "self-aggrandizement". ]]> Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:14:38 -0400 ======================...

Steve: You are luckier than me. I am a slow reader, it wasted me twice as much time.

I see nothing of value but "self-aggrandizement". ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/82267-canadian-solar-shines-with-strong-guidance-and-results?source=feed#comment-190595 190595 Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:13:24 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/81879-a-missed-opportunity-in-canadian-solar?source=feed#comment-190188 190188
Time is set to: 1 year
Frequency is set to: Daily
SMA (simple moving average) is set to: 200

*** You can change ticker to TSL or any other stock symbol.
*** Except FSLR, no other solar stock could stay above its 200-day MAVG early this year when solars had a sharp sell-off.

bigcharts.marketwatch....=
]]> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:43:51 -0400
Time is set to: 1 year
Frequency is set to: Daily
SMA (simple moving average) is set to: 200

*** You can change ticker to TSL or any other stock symbol.
*** Except FSLR, no other solar stock could stay above its 200-day MAVG early this year when solars had a sharp sell-off.

bigcharts.marketwatch....=
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/81879-a-missed-opportunity-in-canadian-solar?source=feed#comment-190159 190159
If your "BigChart" already has default settings, your chart may display MAVG other than 200-day MAVG. Now do the following:

Time is set to: 1 year
Frequency is set to: Daily
SMA (simple moving average) is set to: 200

bigcharts.marketwatch....]]> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:21:48 -0400
If your "BigChart" already has default settings, your chart may display MAVG other than 200-day MAVG. Now do the following:

Time is set to: 1 year
Frequency is set to: Daily
SMA (simple moving average) is set to: 200

bigcharts.marketwatch....]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/81879-a-missed-opportunity-in-canadian-solar?source=feed#comment-190053 190053
"One day does not make a pattern, of course, but CSIQ gave up 10% today and TSL held up nicely."

This comment made on 6-19-08 is interesting and true (but misleading, in a way, intended by the author): CSIQ was down 3.77. while TSL was up 0.38 on 6-19-08.
======================...

A bit of history here: (Following appeared as a comment on another article "Further Thoughts on Trina Solar …")

6-14-08 10:01 PM
An interesting observation by Aquaculture:

06-13-08 close.
CSIQ: 39.00 - TSL: 38.99
Its a neck-and-neck race Jack.
Have a great weekend.
----------------------...

But the closing prices on 6-19-08 were:

CSIQ --- 47.23 --- down 3.77
TSL ---- 39.36 --- up 0.38

The closing price certainly gives a better picture as to which horse is pulling ahead, rather than the changes in just one day (CSIQ down 3.77, TSL up 0.38).
======================...

Even with drastically different starting points, CSIQ was able to reach parity with TSL at 39 on 6-13-08 -- that was a tremendous display of strength on CSIQ's part already. Since then and until today, CSIQ continues to pull ahead and leaving TSL in the dust. CSIQ is the strongest stock in the strongest and the most promising sector - solar. It is my believe, CSIQ will continue to out-perform TSL for a long time to come.
======================...

Final note: Dr. Jack Yetiv worked very hard and very diligently and for very long to uncover this gem (CSIQ), long before its meteoric rise to become the King of Performance and dethroned FSLR some weeks ago. CSIQ was Dr. Yetiv's top choice for a long time -- until TSL came along. Even so, he still considers that CSIQ is a better stock than any other stock in the solar sector, except TSL, of course.

When a stock's fundamental picture and technical picture agrees with one another, the chance for investor's success will be very much improved. However, if they disagree - be very cautious.

CSIQ has never been a weak stock. During the sharp sell-off of solars early this year, only two solars were able to stay above their 200-day MAVG -- CSIQ & FSLR.

CSIQ: Red line is its 200-day MAVG:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=

Relative performance: CSIQ vs TSL (along with FSLR & STP)
stockcharts.com/charts...]]> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:18:37 -0400
"One day does not make a pattern, of course, but CSIQ gave up 10% today and TSL held up nicely."

This comment made on 6-19-08 is interesting and true (but misleading, in a way, intended by the author): CSIQ was down 3.77. while TSL was up 0.38 on 6-19-08.
======================...

A bit of history here: (Following appeared as a comment on another article "Further Thoughts on Trina Solar …")

6-14-08 10:01 PM
An interesting observation by Aquaculture:

06-13-08 close.
CSIQ: 39.00 - TSL: 38.99
Its a neck-and-neck race Jack.
Have a great weekend.
----------------------...

But the closing prices on 6-19-08 were:

CSIQ --- 47.23 --- down 3.77
TSL ---- 39.36 --- up 0.38

The closing price certainly gives a better picture as to which horse is pulling ahead, rather than the changes in just one day (CSIQ down 3.77, TSL up 0.38).
======================...

Even with drastically different starting points, CSIQ was able to reach parity with TSL at 39 on 6-13-08 -- that was a tremendous display of strength on CSIQ's part already. Since then and until today, CSIQ continues to pull ahead and leaving TSL in the dust. CSIQ is the strongest stock in the strongest and the most promising sector - solar. It is my believe, CSIQ will continue to out-perform TSL for a long time to come.
======================...

Final note: Dr. Jack Yetiv worked very hard and very diligently and for very long to uncover this gem (CSIQ), long before its meteoric rise to become the King of Performance and dethroned FSLR some weeks ago. CSIQ was Dr. Yetiv's top choice for a long time -- until TSL came along. Even so, he still considers that CSIQ is a better stock than any other stock in the solar sector, except TSL, of course.

When a stock's fundamental picture and technical picture agrees with one another, the chance for investor's success will be very much improved. However, if they disagree - be very cautious.

CSIQ has never been a weak stock. During the sharp sell-off of solars early this year, only two solars were able to stay above their 200-day MAVG -- CSIQ & FSLR.

CSIQ: Red line is its 200-day MAVG:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=

Relative performance: CSIQ vs TSL (along with FSLR & STP)
stockcharts.com/charts...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/80675-further-thoughts-on-trina-solar-and-the-solar-space?source=feed#comment-186779 186779
His statement, and I quote:
"It seems to me that with such a lot of extra product hitting the market that selling prices across the board for solar companies are in danger of softening as we get into 2009 and a growing awareness of this should act as a headwind for most solar stocks in later 2008."
======================...

For solar industry to parallel the rise of the semiconductor industry since early 1970s, the ASP of PV cells/modules/panels must continue to decline, the conversion efficiency (light to electricity) must keep improving, and the cost of making PV products must steadily reducing - either through the improvement of manufacturing efficiency or via economy of scale.

The market's size is not static, it responds dramatically to the ASP. As ASP declines, the market size (or demand for PV products) could experience an exponential rise - creating some big winners in the solar sector (similar to that during the rise of the semiconductor sector spanning 2 to 3 decades created dozens of 100- or more baggers.).

While 'Atticvs Research' considered that the decline in ASP as a "headwind" -- I, for one, happen to consider that to be the "tailwind" for solars.

Here comes the inherent problem with the fundamental analysis: When two people look at the same facts and same data, and agreed on both - and, yet reach two completely opposite conclusions. To me, for solar sector is to have any future, the ASP must decline.

Good or bad, when the ASP does decline? For a young industry, in the early stage of its mega-trend (like solar), the ASP decline is good -- because there is far more room for the market size to expand and far more room for manufacturing efficiency to improve. But, for a matured industry, in the late stage of its long life (like semiconductor), the ASP decline is bad -- because there is only a limited room for the market size to expand and only a very limited room for manufacturing efficiency to improve.

Conclusion:

The ASP's decline, if it is occurring in the early stage and continues to occur during its long-term rapidly growing phase of a new megatrend is GOOD -- it is this perfect condition of the incubator that many big-winners are born and then nurtured.

The ASP's decline, if it is occurring in the late stage and continues to occur during its aging life with limited growth prospects ahead is BAD -- it is exactly this condition that caused many once-great
stocks to go nowhere, or worse, suffered significant losses in their stock values.

For fundamental analysis, different people look at the identical fact and identical data, and agree on them -- yet, can reach entirely opposite conclusions. This is the problem inherent therein.

======================...

Footnote: About the neck-and-neck race between CSIQ and TSL, I would say that one-day's change is insignificant, because the next day the role could be reversed. In the early going, conceivably, they may very well take turns to take the lead. However, over a somewhat longer time span, like 6 months to a year, the divergence in their performances should become apparent.
]]> Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:34:27 -0400
His statement, and I quote:
"It seems to me that with such a lot of extra product hitting the market that selling prices across the board for solar companies are in danger of softening as we get into 2009 and a growing awareness of this should act as a headwind for most solar stocks in later 2008."
======================...

For solar industry to parallel the rise of the semiconductor industry since early 1970s, the ASP of PV cells/modules/panels must continue to decline, the conversion efficiency (light to electricity) must keep improving, and the cost of making PV products must steadily reducing - either through the improvement of manufacturing efficiency or via economy of scale.

The market's size is not static, it responds dramatically to the ASP. As ASP declines, the market size (or demand for PV products) could experience an exponential rise - creating some big winners in the solar sector (similar to that during the rise of the semiconductor sector spanning 2 to 3 decades created dozens of 100- or more baggers.).

While 'Atticvs Research' considered that the decline in ASP as a "headwind" -- I, for one, happen to consider that to be the "tailwind" for solars.

Here comes the inherent problem with the fundamental analysis: When two people look at the same facts and same data, and agreed on both - and, yet reach two completely opposite conclusions. To me, for solar sector is to have any future, the ASP must decline.

Good or bad, when the ASP does decline? For a young industry, in the early stage of its mega-trend (like solar), the ASP decline is good -- because there is far more room for the market size to expand and far more room for manufacturing efficiency to improve. But, for a matured industry, in the late stage of its long life (like semiconductor), the ASP decline is bad -- because there is only a limited room for the market size to expand and only a very limited room for manufacturing efficiency to improve.

Conclusion:

The ASP's decline, if it is occurring in the early stage and continues to occur during its long-term rapidly growing phase of a new megatrend is GOOD -- it is this perfect condition of the incubator that many big-winners are born and then nurtured.

The ASP's decline, if it is occurring in the late stage and continues to occur during its aging life with limited growth prospects ahead is BAD -- it is exactly this condition that caused many once-great
stocks to go nowhere, or worse, suffered significant losses in their stock values.

For fundamental analysis, different people look at the identical fact and identical data, and agree on them -- yet, can reach entirely opposite conclusions. This is the problem inherent therein.

======================...

Footnote: About the neck-and-neck race between CSIQ and TSL, I would say that one-day's change is insignificant, because the next day the role could be reversed. In the early going, conceivably, they may very well take turns to take the lead. However, over a somewhat longer time span, like 6 months to a year, the divergence in their performances should become apparent.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/80675-further-thoughts-on-trina-solar-and-the-solar-space?source=feed#comment-185693 185693
06-13-08 close.
CSIQ: 39.00 - TSL: 38.99
Its a neck-and-neck race Jack.
Have a great weekend.
======================

A bit of history here:

73.06: Was TSL's all-time-high (before the sharp sell-off of solars early this year.)
31.44: Was CSIQ's previous (12-26-2007) all-time-high (before the sharp sell-off of solars early this year.)

It WAS NOT a neck-and-neck, but it is now.

Now, place your bets which horse will pull ahead 6 months or a year from today.

TSL chart:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=

CSIQ chart:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=]]> Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:01:49 -0400
06-13-08 close.
CSIQ: 39.00 - TSL: 38.99
Its a neck-and-neck race Jack.
Have a great weekend.
======================

A bit of history here:

73.06: Was TSL's all-time-high (before the sharp sell-off of solars early this year.)
31.44: Was CSIQ's previous (12-26-2007) all-time-high (before the sharp sell-off of solars early this year.)

It WAS NOT a neck-and-neck, but it is now.

Now, place your bets which horse will pull ahead 6 months or a year from today.

TSL chart:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=

CSIQ chart:
bigcharts.marketwatch....=]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/80675-further-thoughts-on-trina-solar-and-the-solar-space?source=feed#comment-183554 183554 CSIQ and FSLR are the only two solars that could stay above 200-day MAVG.

(2) During the recovery phase of solars from March to mid-May:
CSIQ, FSLR, and JASO are the only three solars that could take out Dec. 07 high.

(3) During current sharp sell-off of solars since mid-May to now:
CSIQ is the only solar that can stay above its 50-day MAVG.

Discussion: Of the three periods considered, CSIQ is the only solar that appears in ALL three.
There may be something special about CSIQ that the Market sees and many of us don't.

bigcharts.marketwatch....=]]> Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:20:31 -0400 CSIQ and FSLR are the only two solars that could stay above 200-day MAVG.

(2) During the recovery phase of solars from March to mid-May:
CSIQ, FSLR, and JASO are the only three solars that could take out Dec. 07 high.

(3) During current sharp sell-off of solars since mid-May to now:
CSIQ is the only solar that can stay above its 50-day MAVG.

Discussion: Of the three periods considered, CSIQ is the only solar that appears in ALL three.
There may be something special about CSIQ that the Market sees and many of us don't.

bigcharts.marketwatch....=]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/80423-which-solar-stocks-will-continue-to-shine?source=feed#comment-180573 180573 ======================...

The chart needs 6 months of data, thus SOL is not included.
All other stocks in Dr. Yetiv's article are in the charts.

Dr. Yetiv's favorite stock, CSIQ, is included in both charts, comparing to the rest. (CSIQ is a real gem.)


stockcharts.com/charts...


stockcharts.com/charts...]]> Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:07:38 -0400 ======================...

The chart needs 6 months of data, thus SOL is not included.
All other stocks in Dr. Yetiv's article are in the charts.

Dr. Yetiv's favorite stock, CSIQ, is included in both charts, comparing to the rest. (CSIQ is a real gem.)


stockcharts.com/charts...


stockcharts.com/charts...]]>