Vladimir Senkov

Galleon's Defense: Insightful vs. Insider Information

Let's imagine for a second that the defendants in this case are found not guilty and are released.
You are arguing that in this case they are entitled to restitution? I think not. When they engaged in the business they engaged in they made choices. When you make choices you take risks. Risks are not limited to just breaking the law or not. Some business practices that may be legal could still create plenty of trouble for you down the road.
Yes, media attention can be bad for business, but it can also be good for business. Even "bad" attention can be good for business. Didn't the defendant in this case get bombarded with new insider tips as a result of these charges?

On Oct 23 07:40 AM fishluvrain wrote:

> With all of the media attention , allegations of wiretap evidence,
> will we really ever know the truth? One would believe as is often
> the case when the Media runs wild with a story, No. The defendant(s)
> were guilty when the ink hit the paper. I don't want to defend someone
> I don't know and am unlikely to meet. I would like to defend the
> right to defense. I am disturbed by the conviction of individuals
> before the trial has even begun. What would be repaired if the
> individuals in this upcoming case were exonerated. The investments
> shown legal and prudent. Who will replace the loss it will cause
> the individuals and the investors. The course of Justice is usually
> fair The course of trial by Media attack packs is not. Will these
> media sites, writers and others make restitution, I think not.