Seeking Alpha

mickelsson

mickelsson
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View mickelsson's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Tesla Announces Model S Cars Get Driven Less Than What The Average U.S. Driver Drives [View article]
    Thanks, @Paulo Santos: Readers can always rely on your articles and your comments to be a snark-fest. Solid investment advice, not so much. And adding to the hilarity this time was your statement "I didn't mean to write an article on Tesla so soon." Now that's funny!

    No position in TSLA, but short patience for click-bait.
    Jun 27, 2015. 03:42 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Prospect Capital - Lies, Distortions And The Truth [View article]
    @milbank: Well, this is definitely strange. Here's the url if you want the article.

    http://bit.ly/1e65zZj

    If PSEC management is really trying to censor this article, they're doing a lousy job. Another example of managerial incompetence? ;-)
    Jun 11, 2015. 01:21 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Prospect Capital - Lies, Distortions And The Truth [View article]
    @incredulous: Since I hadn't looked at the Investopedia article before, the caching explanation seemed unlikely. But--being somewhat incredulous myself--I went to a different computer, not networked with mine, cleared the cache (unnecessary, but why not be thorough?), and searched using a slightly different search string on an obscure search engine (Lycos): Bingo, up pops the full article. Just for giggles, I went to another non-networked computer, cleared the cache and used Yandex, the Russian search engine: Bingo again! That pretty much disqualifies CPU, disk, and web caching as explanations for why I can still access the article.
    Unless, of course, the Russians are in on it . . .
    Jun 11, 2015. 12:38 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Prospect Capital - Lies, Distortions And The Truth [View article]
    @incredulous123: I agree with koleffstephan that your comments are knowledgeable. If you want to retain that reputation, you may want to avoid the drift toward conspiracy theory in your statement about "shutting down the investopedia article." As a number of other commenters state above (and as I can confirm by having just checked), the Investopedia article is still on-line.
    Jun 11, 2015. 11:23 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • John Hussman: Why Stocks Are Not 'Cheap Relative To Bonds' [View article]
    @HanYOLO. I think the hostility comes from the fact that Hussman endlessly pontificates with absolute certainty, but produces lousy returns. Take a look at the 10 year chart of his Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). In one of the greatest bull markets in history he managed to turn $10,000 of his clients' money into $7566 (most of that decline in the last 4 years). That's what happens when a perma-bear (or a perma-anything) ignores the facts. He has spent much of the last 7 years not just fighting the tape, but telling everyone why the tape is wrong.
    Eventually, like a broken clock he will be right again, as he was in 2008.
    Jun 9, 2015. 01:57 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ETF Stats For May 2015 - Spot Failures And Extreme Makeovers [View article]
    Ron, in addition to your usual useful scorecard, I appreciate your discussion of AccuShares VXUP and VXDN. The quest for a means to play the spot VIX goes on . . .
    Jun 7, 2015. 08:50 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Preparing For The Market's Collapse [View article]
    That's clear enough, TF17, but if Chris needs "hundreds" of separate accounts, that means at least 200. Multiply that times the FDIC limit of $250,000 and you have cash stashing capability of as much as $50 million. Makes me wonder why the author is collecting pennies for writing articles on SA.

    I think I detect a degree of "mine is bigger than yours" boasting that is unnecessary (and a little embarrassing) for someone of Chris's stature on this site.
    May 27, 2015. 10:39 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Today's Income Investor Guide To Picking CEFs [View article]
    @Adam: As I say on a comment further down the page, I'm a fan and a follower, but your "nothing particularly wrong with them" comment on HQH and HQL pretty casually dismisses some of the top-performing CEFs of the past year.

    My stake in HQL is up ~58% on a total return basis in the past 13 months. Both HQH and HQL are well-managed and have a component of venture capital investment not often available to retail investors. DGI fans should also look at the distribution record.

    I'll take that kind of "nothing particularly wrong" any day of the week.
    May 27, 2015. 10:02 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Today's Income Investor Guide To Picking CEFs [View article]
    @ Adam and @doubletime: While you're right to distinguish between managed distributions and yield, you shouldn't leave readers with the impression that "many" CEFs have managed distributions. Of the 562 funds listed on CEF Connect, only 80 (14.23%) have m.d. Conveniently, these can be screened out.
    Despite the quibble, I'm a fan and a follower of your articles, Adam.
    May 27, 2015. 09:44 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Concurrent Computer Offers A 7.8% Yield [View article]
    As I commented on another of your articles earlier today, Henry, you always manage to find something interesting. Although CCUR has a long history for a tech company and a lot of cash, it seems like it has a narrow niche, and so I would only consider it for the "speculative" portion of my portfolio. But you've put it on my radar, and I thank you (and you too @Investor496).
    May 27, 2015. 08:45 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Sell-Off In Corporate Credit Creates Income Opportunities For 2015 [View article]
    A very useful overview of the prospects for bonds. Thank you, Ms. Gaffney.
    May 27, 2015. 08:16 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • My High Risk Account: All Dividend Yields Are 13% Or Higher [View article]
    I'm late getting to this article, Henry, but wanted to thank you for it. You always have something interesting to offer.
    I have a very similar speculative fund--never more than 3% of my total assets. I also have JMI in mine, bought at $7.93, along with GGN (@$7.20) and NBG (@$1.00). As I tell my wife--I don't drink, I don't smoke, I don't chaw, I don't do drugs, I don't gamble, I don't run around with other women--I need to have some fun. And, unlike those habits, one of these stocks might actually pay off.
    May 27, 2015. 02:16 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Elon Musk Is Really Selling [View article]
    Well, Dana, thanks for trying to raise this investment thesis in a rational, reflective manner. Unfortunately, any article that comes within hailing distance of the topic of climate change provokes the Yahoos. At least you get a penny for each of their "thoughts." More than they are worth, but less than you deserve.
    May 21, 2015. 06:40 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • What Elon Musk Is Really Selling [View article]
    @jim15936: Ahh, the inevitable links to Christopher Booker articles. Because he writes for UK papers, perhaps he gives the appearance of worldly sophistication.
    But consider this: 1) he was a history major and has no scientific training; 2) he claims that there is no evidence for the theory of evolution; and 3) he also argued against the evidence linking asbestos exposure and health problems. Are you sure that's the kind of "scientific" authority you want to cite?
    May 21, 2015. 06:32 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • 2015 And Historical Bear Market Triggers [View article]
    Chris, despite some of the comments above (I'm looking at you, @junji, @bouzy, and @TDune75) some of us deeply appreciate your data-driven approach to the market.
    I encourage those who are interested in actual information (as opposed to their own intuition and innate genius) to regularly read Chris's articles at SA and to look at his Ciovacco Capital videos at http://bit.ly/1cQ3Q9w
    May 21, 2015. 10:25 AM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
252 Comments
322 Likes