frankie cooper

uSirius iPhone Application Is Denied

ummmmmm....don't you guys get it? even if SIRI does file chptr 11, its not going anywhere. wierd fantasy you're having....


On Mar 01 03:15 PM sl62 wrote:

> Relmor...
>
> You're right. I also think APPL wants to wait until SIRI proves it
> will get past this tricky time successfully. No sense in associating
> with a company (or goving it a space on the Apple Store) that (according
> to MSM) still has the BK factor in the conversation. This might still
> happen in 6 months when things settle down and are 90% on the upswing..plus
> economy should be a little improved by then. Not the right timing
> right here. Hope it's warm out there by you. I'm sick of freezing!!!!
> We're all getting excited it's going to be 40 degrees here this week
> LMAO...

Commercials on Sirius XM: Benefit vs. Backlash

what are you talking about? radio isn't dead. did you simply make that up??
ummmmmmmmmmm......viab... business model? like getting out of the RADIO business?? thank GOD you are not running the company. what would those 19mil subscribers do?? lololololol


On Nov 27 01:42 AM Konsta wrote:

> as far as not being able to short stocks under 5$, not necessarily
> so, e-trade lets you short stocks over 3$ , so it depends on the
> brokerage. as far as the person who is upset with the "move to a
> communist country" comment, this company needs to come up with a
> VIABLE business model iinstead of f--king around like they have been,
> and commericals are such a viable option that works for everyone
> else. so I say, you tried, you failed, and now try something that
> your peers do that actually works.
> also go beyond radio, radio is almost dead, i.e. expand into tv,
> gps and internet access inside vehicles
>
> disclosure: i hold a small position in sirius at a very low price,
> it's a speculative stock

Three Reasons for Sirius Aggravation

its so funny to see everyone who cries about these drastic mistakes that mel has made running SIRI. i didn't see people crying when he took the subs from 400,000 to 19 million and a virtual monopoly today. i also don't see how mel forced SIRI/XM merger to LANGUISH for a year and a half, putting it in the financial position it is in now. if mel was so terrible, people would have been calling for his head in 2006 , two years after he had taken the helm (because - let's face it - if he was a terrible CEO and a crook, he didn't become that way overnight, right? people would have seen what a "lousy" job he was doing, right?). it wasn't until the stock price plummeted when people started grumbling and pointing fingers at "mel the crook". please tell me WHAT STOCK has NOT plummeted in the past few months??

cooler heads prevail. no one told you to hold when the bottom started to fall out of SIRI, it was your greed/ignorance/inabil... to use stop loss that put YOU in the position you are in now. now you are fucked. take responsibility, because its not mel's fault.


On Nov 20 01:40 AM i'm not jim cramer wrote:

> relmor; I respect your opinion, but who on this board, even me who
> you know thinks sirius has no long term future, would have ever guessed
> that it would trade at 16 cents. So we would be crazy to assume,
> that it can't go to any particular price.
>
> Also, you are right that they don't fear a takeover, ironically enough
> because of the huge bloated number of shares make that unwieldy and
> the limited prospect of financing capability.
>
> I said about buying at one cent tongue-in-cheek, because I had given
> some thought to buying at 20 cents. The price drop this week I believe
> reflects sat radio's poor decision to bet the house on auto installations.
> Satellite, should mean that it is the very essence of portability,
> but they have gone the opposite way and tied it to the car. Ipods
> made and sold millions before the first auto adapter for car use
> was ever marketed. They knew the market better than Mel.
>
> I have three children under 16 with two cell phones and two mp3 players
> between them. I pay a helluva lot more for their cell subscriptions
> than I would for Sirius, but they don't ask for sat radio. It doesn't
> play a part in their world at all. None of their friends have it
> either because I've asked.
>
> Looking at it from a business perspective, where is the marketing
> toward women and girls? How many women will buy subs based on NASCAR,
> sports and Howard? If it comes in their cars for free, what programming
> will lure them to keep it after the first year? I would be willing
> to bet that if we had the info, we would find that there is a big
> disparity in the numbers of men who re-up their freebies, versus
> the number of women.
>
> So it's not all about manipulation. A number of very basic totally
> crappy business decisions brought us here. Remember, in the world
> where Mel made his fortune and reputation, women and men are not
> viewed on the same scale. Advertisers pay more for the male demographic,
> especially on sports etc. than they do the female demo. If Mel came
> into this thinking that would work in non-advertising based radio
> too, well he blew a lot of people's money by not understanding the
> difference!

Sirius Investors: Decline in OEM Take Rate Something to Watch

you guys who threaten to sue MEL sound so ridiculous. you DO realize that you would be suing SIRI-XM, not MEL. and you DO realize that you would have to PAY (out of YOUR pocket) an attorney (because no one would take the case as a class action and actually believe he could win..), and that MEL would pay ZERO to defend himself because SIRI-XM would be footing the bill (actually, dummy, YOU the shareholder would be footing the bill....). so who loses? again and again - its you.....

take responsibility for your OWN avarice and lack of knowledge or discipline. learn how to trade and most important - learn how to MITIGATE RISK. stop loss, peeps - learn how to use it.


On Nov 21 03:37 AM SirusDun wrote:

> Don’t talk bad about Sirius here are you will be absorbed. (READ
> FAST)
>
> Can it be more obvious that Sirius pays advertisers, bloggers, and
> people to post good things about Sirius?
>
> Well, Mel the vote is pretty much over. You can stop paying people
> to post confusion and start paying for Xmass sales. Like you have
> a clue what the company needs (You don’t). I want to know how much
> Sirius paid this quarter for blogging advertising?
>
> STOCK PREDICTION
>
> Sirius at .06 before the split…
> 50 to 1 split puts it at 3.00
> Shorts continue.
> When it hits 1.00 after the split Mel will take it private 50 million
> on the cheap…
>
> Yes, I am already prepared to sue Mel directly when he does the reverse
> split.
>
> Economy hell, Mel is just another NWO elitist clown…

Earnings Preview: Sirius XM Radio

i don't think that mel was referring to ALL retail shareholders when he made that comment, but he was somewhat on the mark....
just look at some of the inane, poorly spelled posts on seeking alpha and yahoo (ESPECIALLY yahoo. pick ONE random page on the SIRI yahoo msg. board (frequented by retail investors), and read the posts) - the word unsophisticated might be generous.
it may seem insulting, but was he far off?


On Nov 09 08:33 PM cos1000 wrote:

> siriusly depressed...
>
> It doesn't change my opinion of Mel at all. All of this information
> has been fully disclosed. Mel insulted us by calling us, as retail
> shareholders unsophisticated. He was probably right. I have never
> attacked Mel, ever on this board or anywhere else. If I felt Mel
> was a criminal and not operating in shareholder best interest I would
> lead the charge in his undoing. Just because I might be insulted
> by what he said, doesn't mean that as I get more sophisticated in
> my analysis, that he was wrong, or Weinkes for that matter.
>
> All this talk on these boards about law suits and Goldman, has been
> a distraction created by those shareholders who post here and are
> regretting their investment.
>
> Just as you, I have been struggling to understand what is going on
> based on the numbers and publicly disclosed SEC reports. No conspiracy
> theories, no paranoia out of control, just analysis of what is available
> to the common shareholder. That is the only discussion that I feel
> is productive and useful in determining what to do next. The information
> I have provided is available for anyone to read from the SEC filings.
> Most, including myself, have been so concerned with SP movement,
> that doing research and analysis has fallen by the wayside.
>
> Morgan Stanley is a relevant player here and soon we will see to
> what extent.... Just because, as disclosed, Mel negotiated the deal
> doesn't mean anything illegal took place. Morgan Stanley has been
> involved with these two companies since inception. Their profiting
> from that relationship is not something that I would be oppose to,
> so long as the current shareholders profit with them.

4 Signs for Further Caution by Satellite Radio Investors - Goldman

if this is how you feel about corporations in general - i suggest that you NEVER buy another stock again. to do so would be INSANE(or dumb, if you will). put your money under your mattress because everyone is out to get you! yikes!!


On Nov 07 11:20 PM markbmark wrote:

> Hear others express shame over Sirius actions
>
> People want to invest in stocks they want to make money. Can you
> blame them for being afraid? We are constantly misled and lied to
> by corporate monsters, by financial analyst and others tied to this
> skewed industry.
>
> Dylan talks about transparency and the lack there of. I say there
> is no transparency until people get caught. These people are constantly
> lying and hiding stuff on balance sheet off balance sheet. Where
> is the protection for shareholders? You’re told to invest in stocks
> and that when you do you are owning a piece of the company, yet you
> really have no rights. When the poop hits the fan you find out that
> the rats have already jumped ship, or they have enriched them selves
> even more over the company destruction and damage that they caused.
>
>
> In the end it is always the shareholders that get hurt. They are
> always the ones left flapping in the wind, via reverse splits, dilution,
> or bankruptcy. The shareholder is the absolute last person in line
> to receive anything except a zero in there bank account. In this
> case imparticular I am referring to siri-xm they are going to have
> a shareholder meeting Dec. 08. and they want to effect as much as
> a 1-50 reverse split and or authorize 8billion more share. Mel Karm.
> I ask where is the responsibility to shareholders.
>
> Where is the responsibility to do the right thing, make the right
> business decisions, and pursue all alternatives available to working
> out any problems that a company might have. Instead corporate finds
> the most profitable and easy alternative is in most cases to just
> wipe out shareholders make them pay the price.
>
> We have been trying to get Sirius shareholders to rally together
> to vote this proxy rev-split thing down. It would be nice to get
> some kind of media exposure. I can’t believe no one is talking about
> this madness on cnbc. Mel publicly states everything is ok and the
> company has no need to sell any assets. They could if they needed
> to. Why do that when we can just unconscionably reduce our shareholders.
> Why should they care they will get theirs and then some regardless.

>
>
> Sincerely The Bagholder
>
> Amen … Vote no Rev Split

4 Signs for Further Caution by Satellite Radio Investors - Goldman

huh? a lawsuit against martha stewart and howard stern?? ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........
time to go back to your padded cell now, mongo.


On Nov 07 08:54 AM scamcity wrote:

> Own stock , bought a new truck(first one and american!) only got
> 90 days included XM, although I like the radio as we lack any country
> stations of any good , the renew is OVERPRICED $ 142.45 a year all
> this for 2 or 3 stations I would listen to. I believe this is on
> purpose to kill the company and take over the remains . At least
> I voted against merger and saw there should be a lawsuit against
> the looters ceo Martha, Howard and the rest of the SCAMMERS , A
> legitimate business model would not give Millions to goofballs, scum
> and FELONS (for scamming) and would price legitimately a $60.00 /yr
> subscription in which everyone would buy it , I am sure they know
> this but the failure to act is to line thier pockets once they scam
> the stockholders monies .

Karmazin Video Provides Some Sirius Answers

actually he didn't even make money back, because he didn't sell...LOLOLOL


On Oct 27 03:20 PM sl62 wrote:

> 163888...
>
> No not your bad punctuation...it's your statement. FYI, daytraders
> DON'T CARE if the company is good or not my friend. Nowhere, does
> a daytrader care if the company is good or bad. A daytrader buys
> and sells purely on action, highs and lows. And the fact that I had
> to explain that to you says more about you than I'm sure you can
> even grasp...
>
> And...if I'm such a dumbass, why did I make money today on SIRI and
> you only made money back??

Karmazin Video Provides Some Sirius Answers

ummmmm....mark2003

point 1 - your spelling is atrocious. it goes beyond typos. it smacks of sloppiness and colors you as a hack.

point 2 - you are going to lose the farm if R/S happens?? newsflash: you have already lost the farm. have you taken a look at the pps lately?

Finally Some Good News for Sirius Shareholders

gekko.
your multi point rebuttal is the most SANE post i have seen on here. thanks for telling these people what time it is.....

Finally Some Good News for Sirius Shareholders

lol. kinda obvious -

koop = hartlieb.


pitiful, really.

don't you have a job, or are you posting on your company's dime??


so far the only guy who seems to be the smart one is the pig farmer. while everyone who was dumb enough to NOT use a stop loss, and cries about how the stock price is mel's fault and blah blah blah - PIG FARMER was making money (about 5 grand this week...). who is the smart one? hmmmmm....


mel has been ceo for a few years now. after the first year, you should have jumped ship instead of riding it all the way down (with the rest of the market, btw, people.LOL). the reverse split wouldn't be an issue if the market hadn't melted. the debt - would have been taken care of, too.
all the things you guys are up in arms about really has nothing to do with mel, but as humans you need someone to blame. you need some explanation.

so sad. but obvious....

Sirius XM Nears Top of Shorts List

not to cheerlead or anything, but i am puzzled as to why people insist that mel karmazin hasn't increased siri's profitability. under mel it seems that the subs have increased EXPONENTIALLY. under mel the competition was absorbed to make siri-xm the only player on the field. i would say that he has earned his pay.
was mel far off the mark when he called some investors "unsophisticated"? perhaps as a p.r. move it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but judging by MANY of the posts i have read, he was right on the mark....

Analysts Find It Hard to Be Bullish on Sirius XM

15 years wireless will be available everywhere? 15years?? huh? are u crazy? is that supposed to be a plug for internet radio? you are kidding, right?

Analysts Find It Hard to Be Bullish on Sirius XM

mark2003 -

you have obviously crossed the point of rational thinking. you are PURE EMOTION at this point. i understand that you have had a massive drawdown of capital, but this is the risk you take in buying stock. i think that its time to man up. NO ONE forced you to forgo any type of stoploss order, which would have gotten you out of this situation a LONG time ago. it was your GREED that convinced you that SIRI would come back and you would be rich. you and no one but YOU hoodwinked yourself.

when are people going to start taking responsibility for their own actions and grow some balls?

such whining babies. this is/has been a spec stock and should have been treated as such. STOP LOSS , people - use it.......

Is a Reverse Split in the Cards for Sirius?

bashers 1000 - cheerleaders 0?? sounds like a PERFECT TIME to buy (which i did all week....). blood in the streets? AWESOME!!!