I so want to believe these guys. But from what i can tell, all they do is write up dozens of findings, then pick the 1 in 10 that turns out to have some merit (based on the law of averages), and cheerlead that "call" in the comments section of the blog.
It would be a lot more genuine to include post-mortems on the 90% of findings that turn out to be dead wrong when compared to actual developments.
Even the sell-side analysts have to plot their upgrades and downgrades on a stock price chart on the last page of their reports.
View Swingline's Comments on:
Raw Data Report: Technology [View article]
It would be a lot more genuine to include post-mortems on the 90% of findings that turn out to be dead wrong when compared to actual developments.
Even the sell-side analysts have to plot their upgrades and downgrades on a stock price chart on the last page of their reports.