bobbobwhite's Comments bobbobwhite's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/189654/comments Ford Gaining on Honda, Toyota in Perceived Quality http://seekingalpha.com/article/174934-ford-gaining-on-honda-toyota-in-perceived-quality?source=feed#comment-777120 777120
From owning all 3 Detroit brands many years ago, I thought all were junk then, and from driving many domestic rental cars since...... they are still junk, as marketing has always ruled Detroit iron sales since the 50's, not quality. And, that will never change.]]>
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:21 -0500
From owning all 3 Detroit brands many years ago, I thought all were junk then, and from driving many domestic rental cars since...... they are still junk, as marketing has always ruled Detroit iron sales since the 50's, not quality. And, that will never change.]]>
10 Reasons to Believe That We're in a Depression http://seekingalpha.com/article/174179-10-reasons-to-believe-that-we-re-in-a-depression?source=feed#comment-769020 769020
The earth will be the final winner, and regain its former health in time, as it " knows" in its eternal Rock of Ages that it would have been much better for all living things if man had never mutated from the apes. But we did, and more's the pity, as we are all now paying dearly for our temporary moment in the sun that we all mindlessly thought would last forever as we uncaringly hurried it along toward its end.


On Nov 19 12:23 PM User 353732 wrote:

> America's greatest export during its great ascent in the 20th century
> was freedom. Free markets, free speech, free elections, free minds.
>
> The freedom to innovate and succeed or fail;the freedom to be accountable
> for one's decisions and actions; the freedom to take the lonely path
> less traveled that often led nowhere but sometimes led to rich hidden
> treasures and unexpected vistas that inspired and motivated entrepreneurs
> and inventors and liberators.
>
> When America stopped exporting freedom because its Bosses no longer
> believed in it and its reigning elites began to import collectivism
> , class warfare and contempt for entrepreneurship and middle class
> values, then the moral and intellectual balance of trade turned against
> the USA and continues to worsen by the month.
>
> The worse the moral and intellectual balance the more debased and
> devalued becomes the polity. This devaluation is now being made tangible
> in the disgrace of the dollar( from as sound as the dollar to as
> fake as a dollar....), in the glorification of entitlements and instant
> gratification, in the mutilation of markets and institutions, in
> the accelerating corruption of the US Regime and in eroding civil
> society. As the moral and intellectual net worth of America is depleted
> so is its capacity to create real wealth and enduring competitive
> advantage.
>
> America cannot "be" Europe or Asia : it can only "be" itself; either
> much worse than Europe or Asia, which is the present trajectory or
> far, far, better which is what a rediscovery of liberty and the truths
> of the Constitution will lead to.
>
> Yes, there is a depression but it is a moral and intellectual one.
> Unless faced and cured, it will surely become a social and economic
> one. This depression is from within and from within may come the
> cure and restoration.
>
> No contender is defeating America the Champion; it is defeating itself.
> Greed, vanity, deceit is what the US Regime now gorges itself on
> every day.......This is not the breakfast of champions.]]>
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:11:05 -0500
The earth will be the final winner, and regain its former health in time, as it " knows" in its eternal Rock of Ages that it would have been much better for all living things if man had never mutated from the apes. But we did, and more's the pity, as we are all now paying dearly for our temporary moment in the sun that we all mindlessly thought would last forever as we uncaringly hurried it along toward its end.


On Nov 19 12:23 PM User 353732 wrote:

> America's greatest export during its great ascent in the 20th century
> was freedom. Free markets, free speech, free elections, free minds.
>
> The freedom to innovate and succeed or fail;the freedom to be accountable
> for one's decisions and actions; the freedom to take the lonely path
> less traveled that often led nowhere but sometimes led to rich hidden
> treasures and unexpected vistas that inspired and motivated entrepreneurs
> and inventors and liberators.
>
> When America stopped exporting freedom because its Bosses no longer
> believed in it and its reigning elites began to import collectivism
> , class warfare and contempt for entrepreneurship and middle class
> values, then the moral and intellectual balance of trade turned against
> the USA and continues to worsen by the month.
>
> The worse the moral and intellectual balance the more debased and
> devalued becomes the polity. This devaluation is now being made tangible
> in the disgrace of the dollar( from as sound as the dollar to as
> fake as a dollar....), in the glorification of entitlements and instant
> gratification, in the mutilation of markets and institutions, in
> the accelerating corruption of the US Regime and in eroding civil
> society. As the moral and intellectual net worth of America is depleted
> so is its capacity to create real wealth and enduring competitive
> advantage.
>
> America cannot "be" Europe or Asia : it can only "be" itself; either
> much worse than Europe or Asia, which is the present trajectory or
> far, far, better which is what a rediscovery of liberty and the truths
> of the Constitution will lead to.
>
> Yes, there is a depression but it is a moral and intellectual one.
> Unless faced and cured, it will surely become a social and economic
> one. This depression is from within and from within may come the
> cure and restoration.
>
> No contender is defeating America the Champion; it is defeating itself.
> Greed, vanity, deceit is what the US Regime now gorges itself on
> every day.......This is not the breakfast of champions.]]>
Best Performing Stocks of the Decade http://seekingalpha.com/article/174279-best-performing-stocks-of-the-decade?source=feed#comment-768856 768856 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:01:47 -0500 Chance of a Depression Now 5 Percent http://seekingalpha.com/article/173913-chance-of-a-depression-now-5-percent?source=feed#comment-765419 765419 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:06:02 -0500 Meredith Whitney: 'I Haven't Been This Bearish in a Year' http://seekingalpha.com/article/173684-meredith-whitney-i-haven-t-been-this-bearish-in-a-year?source=feed#comment-763790 763790
Kidding, I think, but it does make me wonder...when will come the tipping point of mass consumer purchasing on online sites that will cause a gov't rush to sales tax all those purchases?

As states go belly-up, I see it coming.


On Nov 16 08:14 PM Gary A wrote:

> No one else is going to buy these mortgage backed securities. There
> is no other market. Bill Gross is getting out of them.
>
> This credit contraction is not over and will bite this economy.<br/>
>
> And states are tanking even though the government lies about consumer
> spending. It has to be a lie, just look at the tax receipts of the
> states. Investors who are believing government numbers are foolish.]]>
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:09:31 -0500
Kidding, I think, but it does make me wonder...when will come the tipping point of mass consumer purchasing on online sites that will cause a gov't rush to sales tax all those purchases?

As states go belly-up, I see it coming.


On Nov 16 08:14 PM Gary A wrote:

> No one else is going to buy these mortgage backed securities. There
> is no other market. Bill Gross is getting out of them.
>
> This credit contraction is not over and will bite this economy.<br/>
>
> And states are tanking even though the government lies about consumer
> spending. It has to be a lie, just look at the tax receipts of the
> states. Investors who are believing government numbers are foolish.]]>
10 Years After Glass-Steagall http://seekingalpha.com/article/173021-10-years-after-glass-steagall?source=feed#comment-758554 758554
Today we have, in modern gov-speak, many "too big to fail" companies that also are seen to threaten our economy in a similar manner, as their potential demise is considered by our gov't to also have the potential to create an excessive burden on that same system, with an extra emphasis on the potential damage to Main Street in employment and other social hardships that may not have occured to a similar extent with monopolies.

What has our gov't done in response to these two similar threats to our country internally? It treats them as entirely different entities and allows the monopolies of giant companies(Wall Street banks, Detroit) to continual at will, even bailing them out with public funds when threatened.

Does the free capitalism that built this country still exist? From the above examples, it definitely does not. We now have a new and modern version of the military/industrial complex that Eisenhower warned against as a danger to our country, only today it is known as the financial/gov't complex, with Goldman Sachs providing the primary seed people for its continued and unassailable prosperity. Pathetic, and so wrong for America.]]>
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:13:39 -0500
Today we have, in modern gov-speak, many "too big to fail" companies that also are seen to threaten our economy in a similar manner, as their potential demise is considered by our gov't to also have the potential to create an excessive burden on that same system, with an extra emphasis on the potential damage to Main Street in employment and other social hardships that may not have occured to a similar extent with monopolies.

What has our gov't done in response to these two similar threats to our country internally? It treats them as entirely different entities and allows the monopolies of giant companies(Wall Street banks, Detroit) to continual at will, even bailing them out with public funds when threatened.

Does the free capitalism that built this country still exist? From the above examples, it definitely does not. We now have a new and modern version of the military/industrial complex that Eisenhower warned against as a danger to our country, only today it is known as the financial/gov't complex, with Goldman Sachs providing the primary seed people for its continued and unassailable prosperity. Pathetic, and so wrong for America.]]>
The Global Oil Scam: 50 Times Bigger than Madoff http://seekingalpha.com/article/172797-the-global-oil-scam-50-times-bigger-than-madoff?source=feed#comment-756992 756992
Fear and lack of courage is what soft living causes, every single time in history......unorganized and cowardly masses so afraid of losing their present quality of life, even as that same quality of life erodes before their very eyes and they perpetually do nothing of significance to prevent it. Pathetic.]]>
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:56:04 -0500
Fear and lack of courage is what soft living causes, every single time in history......unorganized and cowardly masses so afraid of losing their present quality of life, even as that same quality of life erodes before their very eyes and they perpetually do nothing of significance to prevent it. Pathetic.]]>
The Global Oil Scam: 50 Times Bigger than Madoff http://seekingalpha.com/article/172797-the-global-oil-scam-50-times-bigger-than-madoff?source=feed#comment-756952 756952
We have the FBI and the CIA, and it is now high time for the BICA(Bank and Investments Control Agency).]]>
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:36:29 -0500
We have the FBI and the CIA, and it is now high time for the BICA(Bank and Investments Control Agency).]]>
Too Big to Fail Banks: A Simple Solution http://seekingalpha.com/article/172499-too-big-to-fail-banks-a-simple-solution?source=feed#comment-755410 755410
Unchangable humans and variations on the above theme will go on until we cannot sustain it and are no more. Many "lesser" humans do not possess this ultimately self defeating behavior, but not enough of them to change our destiny as these have little power, but all of the rich and powerful decision-makers everywhere are of this ilk, so due to them we as a species are approaching the end of our tenure because those who are that way have to win everything and care nothing about those who cannot or will not compete with them for all the riches.

See Goldman Sachs and Washington DC et al for proof of this.]]>
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:21:12 -0500
Unchangable humans and variations on the above theme will go on until we cannot sustain it and are no more. Many "lesser" humans do not possess this ultimately self defeating behavior, but not enough of them to change our destiny as these have little power, but all of the rich and powerful decision-makers everywhere are of this ilk, so due to them we as a species are approaching the end of our tenure because those who are that way have to win everything and care nothing about those who cannot or will not compete with them for all the riches.

See Goldman Sachs and Washington DC et al for proof of this.]]>
The Unsustainable Lie of Inflation http://seekingalpha.com/article/172262-the-unsustainable-lie-of-inflation?source=feed#comment-755294 755294
Has anyone, in their heart of hearts, really bought the thinking that this off-the-wall and totally unnatural agenda has been successful in the America we see today?


On Nov 09 06:09 PM lower98th wrote:

> Have you noticed, in recent years, that the person objecting to a
> crime is more likely to be ostracized than the person Committing
> a crime. At all level. Our society has perfected the art of obliterating
> anyone who tells an inconvenient truth.]]>
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:14:25 -0500
Has anyone, in their heart of hearts, really bought the thinking that this off-the-wall and totally unnatural agenda has been successful in the America we see today?


On Nov 09 06:09 PM lower98th wrote:

> Have you noticed, in recent years, that the person objecting to a
> crime is more likely to be ostracized than the person Committing
> a crime. At all level. Our society has perfected the art of obliterating
> anyone who tells an inconvenient truth.]]>
Are Oil and Natural Gas Cheap or Expensive? http://seekingalpha.com/article/171769-are-oil-and-natural-gas-cheap-or-expensive?source=feed#comment-752477 752477
Try to be fact-based and fair in your arguments, or are you being paid not to be? Like it or not, NG will be the bridge fuel from oil to green, and will finally get us away from foreign oil dependency. That alone is reason enough to use it until it too is gone.]]>
Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:37:47 -0500
Try to be fact-based and fair in your arguments, or are you being paid not to be? Like it or not, NG will be the bridge fuel from oil to green, and will finally get us away from foreign oil dependency. That alone is reason enough to use it until it too is gone.]]>
Charlie Gasparino: Another Crash 'Has to Happen Again' http://seekingalpha.com/article/171549-charlie-gasparino-another-crash-has-to-happen-again?source=feed#comment-747905 747905
This will never happen, of course, but it is one of my fondest wishes. What a dreamer I am, but I just can't help it.]]>
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:00:29 -0500
This will never happen, of course, but it is one of my fondest wishes. What a dreamer I am, but I just can't help it.]]>
Why Junk Bond ETFs Have Been Cleaning Up http://seekingalpha.com/article/170933-why-junk-bond-etfs-have-been-cleaning-up?source=feed#comment-744628 744628
Satisfied with yield over growth for now. ]]>
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:26:14 -0500
Satisfied with yield over growth for now. ]]>
Earnings Season: The Car Is Shiny, But Look Under the Hood http://seekingalpha.com/article/170851-earnings-season-the-car-is-shiny-but-look-under-the-hood?source=feed#comment-744443 744443

On Nov 04 11:03 AM jdl51 wrote:

> Well, I've always been told that the markets are forward looking.
> We've gone up over 50% in six months. The markets anticipated improved
> earnings, they're here and now we're waiting for what's next. If
> the economy continues to improve, job cuts are trending down and
> are expected to show growth shortly after the first of the year,
> then we'll start the next leg up.]]>
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:55:08 -0500

On Nov 04 11:03 AM jdl51 wrote:

> Well, I've always been told that the markets are forward looking.
> We've gone up over 50% in six months. The markets anticipated improved
> earnings, they're here and now we're waiting for what's next. If
> the economy continues to improve, job cuts are trending down and
> are expected to show growth shortly after the first of the year,
> then we'll start the next leg up.]]>
Riding the Rails: Why BNI Was Berkshire's Best Bet - And Vintage Buffett http://seekingalpha.com/article/170927-riding-the-rails-why-bni-was-berkshire-s-best-bet-and-vintage-buffett?source=feed#comment-744387 744387
Also, I have noticed over the past few years that Warren is acting more on emotions as he ages. That is a typical aging pattern but is also a dangerous and risky departure for him. I do not think this buy will be a great thing for Berkshire, not terrible, just a ho-hum one over time and certainly not worth the price paid in returns given.

On Nov 04 12:10 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> My comment is Warren Buffet has good big picture view, bad timing
> and bad pricing. Every one in the world has known for two years that
> Warren Buffett loves railways. He openly talked about it more than
> two years ago. So why why he picks a time to pay nearly the higest
> price? Way over-paid.
>
> If he likes railway, Chinese railways are way much better play. The
> capacity of China's railways transportation is stretched tot he extreme.
> Whole America's railway system has excessive capacity that is idled.
>
>
> If he likes commodity and transportation play, he should be buying
> coal mines, and he should be buying dry bulk shippers. Both sectors
> are dirt cheap compare with railways.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
>
> I am afraid Warren Buffett is getting too old to calculate relative
> valuations correctly. There are so many good under-valued assets
> around at dirt cheap price. Railway will be the last thing I will
> pick up. It's going to be good, but just not as good as other things.]]>
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:22:39 -0500
Also, I have noticed over the past few years that Warren is acting more on emotions as he ages. That is a typical aging pattern but is also a dangerous and risky departure for him. I do not think this buy will be a great thing for Berkshire, not terrible, just a ho-hum one over time and certainly not worth the price paid in returns given.

On Nov 04 12:10 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> My comment is Warren Buffet has good big picture view, bad timing
> and bad pricing. Every one in the world has known for two years that
> Warren Buffett loves railways. He openly talked about it more than
> two years ago. So why why he picks a time to pay nearly the higest
> price? Way over-paid.
>
> If he likes railway, Chinese railways are way much better play. The
> capacity of China's railways transportation is stretched tot he extreme.
> Whole America's railway system has excessive capacity that is idled.
>
>
> If he likes commodity and transportation play, he should be buying
> coal mines, and he should be buying dry bulk shippers. Both sectors
> are dirt cheap compare with railways.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
>
> I am afraid Warren Buffett is getting too old to calculate relative
> valuations correctly. There are so many good under-valued assets
> around at dirt cheap price. Railway will be the last thing I will
> pick up. It's going to be good, but just not as good as other things.]]>
Property Values Set to Fall 43% from Current Depressed Levels http://seekingalpha.com/article/170526-property-values-set-to-fall-43-from-current-depressed-levels?source=feed#comment-742270 742270
On Nov 02 09:59 AM John Galt wrote:

> I read a Goldman economist said that housing prices would nationally
> be 5% lower if the government didn't get involved. So the prices
> in Nebraska, South Dakota, Idaho might be similar to what they are
> now, but the prices in say Miami, Vegas and Phoenix might be 20%
> lower... Who knows what the real number is, but 5% is pretty noteworthy.
> That also doesn't factor in that housing prices still might go even
> lower ( I think they will).
>
> I've been probably the biggest bear you could find on housing, but
> I don't think prices will fall another 43%.]]>
Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:38:28 -0500
On Nov 02 09:59 AM John Galt wrote:

> I read a Goldman economist said that housing prices would nationally
> be 5% lower if the government didn't get involved. So the prices
> in Nebraska, South Dakota, Idaho might be similar to what they are
> now, but the prices in say Miami, Vegas and Phoenix might be 20%
> lower... Who knows what the real number is, but 5% is pretty noteworthy.
> That also doesn't factor in that housing prices still might go even
> lower ( I think they will).
>
> I've been probably the biggest bear you could find on housing, but
> I don't think prices will fall another 43%.]]>
How Much Did 'Cash for Clunkers' Cost? http://seekingalpha.com/article/170385-how-much-did-cash-for-clunkers-cost?source=feed#comment-740696 740696 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:25:44 -0500 How Much Did 'Cash for Clunkers' Cost? http://seekingalpha.com/article/170385-how-much-did-cash-for-clunkers-cost?source=feed#comment-740674 740674
"Why do today what you can put off indefinitely? We're the gov't, we don't have to care what they say or answer to anyone for anything."


On Nov 01 11:17 AM D. McHattie wrote:

> White House economist Jared Bernstein: "In other words, I'm sure
> that some of those sales were pulled forward...we really need that
> growth now. Pulling sales forward is actually helpful."
>
> This statement says a lot about this administration's approach to
> the economy.
>
> Borrow growth from the future. Kick the can down the road. Cross
> that bridge when we come to it. Why do today what we can put off
> until tomorrow.
>
> Is this administration so unforgivably stunned that it actually thinks
> this is a sound approach?]]>
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:14:17 -0500
"Why do today what you can put off indefinitely? We're the gov't, we don't have to care what they say or answer to anyone for anything."


On Nov 01 11:17 AM D. McHattie wrote:

> White House economist Jared Bernstein: "In other words, I'm sure
> that some of those sales were pulled forward...we really need that
> growth now. Pulling sales forward is actually helpful."
>
> This statement says a lot about this administration's approach to
> the economy.
>
> Borrow growth from the future. Kick the can down the road. Cross
> that bridge when we come to it. Why do today what we can put off
> until tomorrow.
>
> Is this administration so unforgivably stunned that it actually thinks
> this is a sound approach?]]>
George Soros: The Guru Outlook http://seekingalpha.com/article/169488-george-soros-the-guru-outlook?source=feed#comment-737032 737032
When Soros talks, it pays well to listen and learn. When Rogers talks, it pays to run out the door before he takes your money.]]>
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:03:42 -0400
When Soros talks, it pays well to listen and learn. When Rogers talks, it pays to run out the door before he takes your money.]]>
Europe Is Breaking Up Its 'Too Big to Fail' Banks http://seekingalpha.com/article/169788-europe-is-breaking-up-its-too-big-to-fail-banks?source=feed#comment-735704 735704
Not to the taxpayers, but to them personally. Count on it.]]>
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:37:05 -0400
Not to the taxpayers, but to them personally. Count on it.]]>
Who Thinks This Recession Is Over? http://seekingalpha.com/article/168645-who-thinks-this-recession-is-over?source=feed#comment-730967 730967
Due to this rot, all eras and countries have their peaks, i.e., Egypt, Greece, Rome, Europe.....first Spain, then France( after 1812) and Britain (after WW1), and now America in 2009. Also, the world art bell-shaped growth curve peaked at the inception of the industrial revolution, with the start of factory production, in the year 1800 and slowly tailed off, and as a result will never again be anywhere near that level. Our progressive modern ways killed it.

It happens in all human life and eras, no use fighting it or denying it. Learn to live with it and within it as best you can. It is here to stay.]]>
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:43:31 -0400
Due to this rot, all eras and countries have their peaks, i.e., Egypt, Greece, Rome, Europe.....first Spain, then France( after 1812) and Britain (after WW1), and now America in 2009. Also, the world art bell-shaped growth curve peaked at the inception of the industrial revolution, with the start of factory production, in the year 1800 and slowly tailed off, and as a result will never again be anywhere near that level. Our progressive modern ways killed it.

It happens in all human life and eras, no use fighting it or denying it. Learn to live with it and within it as best you can. It is here to stay.]]>
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News http://seekingalpha.com/article/168484-wall-street-breakfast-must-know-news?source=feed#comment-726832 726832
And, companies complaining that lowered pay will cost them their best employees to higher paying, unrestricted companies should recognize that losing them is really a blessing in disguise. The executives they stand to lose are the ones who created our economic crisis in the first place, as giant money rewards were always their primary motivation and not the quality and need of their products. Good riddance to those self centered non-producers.

On Oct 23 09:15 AM AndrewBaker wrote:

> A basic problem is that there are too many people getting paid for
> doing non-jobs and non-productive jobs: the list includes many politicians,
> State and Federal workers, bank, insurance and financial company
> workers and the many media commentators who are so fond of telling
> us what needs to be done for the economy to improve.
>
> Add to this the exorbitant pay that is now common in many companies
> for higher and highest level staff and paid on the excuse that they
> need to retain the best people, and it is no wonder that the greed
> of these non-producers has caused a downturn from which it will years
> to recover.
>
> Token gestures to restrict pay for a certain group is just not enough.
> Pay differentials from base to peak need to be far less than they
> are, and based on real productiveness and genuine capability, not
> just paid to someone just because they've reached a level where excessive
> pay is the norm regardless of the quality of the person's real personal
> contribution.]]>
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:46:20 -0400
And, companies complaining that lowered pay will cost them their best employees to higher paying, unrestricted companies should recognize that losing them is really a blessing in disguise. The executives they stand to lose are the ones who created our economic crisis in the first place, as giant money rewards were always their primary motivation and not the quality and need of their products. Good riddance to those self centered non-producers.

On Oct 23 09:15 AM AndrewBaker wrote:

> A basic problem is that there are too many people getting paid for
> doing non-jobs and non-productive jobs: the list includes many politicians,
> State and Federal workers, bank, insurance and financial company
> workers and the many media commentators who are so fond of telling
> us what needs to be done for the economy to improve.
>
> Add to this the exorbitant pay that is now common in many companies
> for higher and highest level staff and paid on the excuse that they
> need to retain the best people, and it is no wonder that the greed
> of these non-producers has caused a downturn from which it will years
> to recover.
>
> Token gestures to restrict pay for a certain group is just not enough.
> Pay differentials from base to peak need to be far less than they
> are, and based on real productiveness and genuine capability, not
> just paid to someone just because they've reached a level where excessive
> pay is the norm regardless of the quality of the person's real personal
> contribution.]]>
The Secret Paulson-Goldman Meeting http://seekingalpha.com/article/167565-the-secret-paulson-goldman-meeting?source=feed#comment-723652 723652
Paulson and all the Wall Street others in Washington know that they are nearly untouchable and thus do whatever they want in the gov't of today, short of anything sexual, which is still taboo in America. The Nixon thing was 35 years ago and great lessons on how not to get caught were learned from it and are extensively practiced today. That less sophisticated 70's era in our country's morality will never again be seen as it is actively worked by our gov't so that it is never seen again. The system must collapse for any change to occur, and that time is coming.]]>
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:01:18 -0400
Paulson and all the Wall Street others in Washington know that they are nearly untouchable and thus do whatever they want in the gov't of today, short of anything sexual, which is still taboo in America. The Nixon thing was 35 years ago and great lessons on how not to get caught were learned from it and are extensively practiced today. That less sophisticated 70's era in our country's morality will never again be seen as it is actively worked by our gov't so that it is never seen again. The system must collapse for any change to occur, and that time is coming.]]>
Will Housing Data Show Improvement This Week? http://seekingalpha.com/article/167490-will-housing-data-show-improvement-this-week?source=feed#comment-722435 722435 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:27 -0400 Why I'm Not Shorting Diedrich Coffee http://seekingalpha.com/article/167178-why-i-m-not-shorting-diedrich-coffee?source=feed#comment-720919 720919
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just the words.]]>
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:34:10 -0400
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just the words.]]>
Why I'm Not Shorting Diedrich Coffee http://seekingalpha.com/article/167178-why-i-m-not-shorting-diedrich-coffee?source=feed#comment-720917 720917
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for of having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just the words.]]>
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:33:44 -0400
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for of having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just the words.]]>
Why I'm Not Shorting Diedrich Coffee http://seekingalpha.com/article/167178-why-i-m-not-shorting-diedrich-coffee?source=feed#comment-720916 720916
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for of having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just words.]]>
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:33:35 -0400
Spending like she does on Starbucks-type coffee is the new paradigm for of having too much money. Used to be cocaine, but is coffee really any different? Just words.]]>
How Washington's Policymakers Are Damaging the U.S. Economy http://seekingalpha.com/article/167166-how-washington-s-policymakers-are-damaging-the-u-s-economy?source=feed#comment-720495 720495 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:53:24 -0400 The Greatest Depression Is Coming http://seekingalpha.com/article/167060-the-greatest-depression-is-coming?source=feed#comment-720394 720394 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:00:03 -0400 Two Madoff victims are the first to take their fight to the SEC: They want their $2.4M back and are suing the agency for negligence. http://seekingalpha.com/news/market_currents/post/34152?source=feed#comment-715234 715234
Oh, but the taxpayers have deep pockets so why not add to their burden by getting them to pay for the gov't's incompetence? This is as bad or worse than Madoff and should be disallowed. Instead, these jerks should sue Madoff and stand in line like the rest of them!]]>
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:04:54 -0400
Oh, but the taxpayers have deep pockets so why not add to their burden by getting them to pay for the gov't's incompetence? This is as bad or worse than Madoff and should be disallowed. Instead, these jerks should sue Madoff and stand in line like the rest of them!]]>