tvb

Money Managers and the Berkshire Hurdle

Good points Nadav and Najdorf. When you invest in a fund you pay the net asset value of the holdings and agree to forego a share of future performance returns through fees. With BRK, the market is theoretically valuing the assets/holdings plus or minus a premium/discount based on assumptions about the future performance returns on those assets. That cost/premium for BRK could translate into a cost much greater than a hedge funds 2/20 fees if the the market's growth assumptions for BRK are high enough (e.g say the share price requires a 40% annual return on assets/holdings just to justify the price). In other words, just because BRK shareholders don't pay a traditional fee for management's expected ALPHA generation, it doesn't mean they aren't paying an equal or greater fee/cost through a high share price premium to asset values.