Seeking Alpha

Road Runner » Comments » BCON

  • Energy Storage on the Smart Grid: 99.45% Cheap and 0.55% Cool [View article]
    John Peterson, You comment above that starts with "Dirk, the costs of wind and solar keep falling ..." is right on the mark. Good job of spelling it out so concisely.
    Jul 20 18:42 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Are Energy Storage Investors Chasing Their Own Tails? [View article]
    Thanks much John. You are a great source of information.
    May 18 09:14 am |Rating: +5 0 |Link to Comment
  • Are Energy Storage Investors Chasing Their Own Tails? [View article]
    GE seems to make smart decisions as to what markets and products to pursue. This battery is just one example. They are heavy into new economy energy products like wind turbines, high-efficiency jet engines, etc. When the storm is over with the big finance side of their house, I believe their stock will do well with their vast portfolio of solid, new economy products. Looks like Jack Welch left the company with good decision makers. That is why I am an investor with them.
    May 18 09:13 am |Rating: +5 0 |Link to Comment
  • Are Energy Storage Investors Chasing Their Own Tails? [View article]
    So GE is making sodium nickel-chloride batteries and not sodium sulfer batteries as reported earlier?
    May 18 09:02 am |Rating: +4 0 |Link to Comment
  • Why Pure Play Energy Storage Companies Could Double for Investors [View article]
    There is a critical need to store energy so that alternate energy can become part of the "base" production capacity in the US and the world. Base production is the energy generation that is available 24/7. Currently, solar and wind are limited mostly to supplemental energy production, with coal and natural gas providing base load. So don’t underestimate John’s claim about the huge potential for battery companies. If they deliver on the promise of cheaper, higher energy density products, then their market will be expand greatly.

    Here’s one tiny example. Alaska’s remote towns are finding TODAY that wind power is more economical for electricity production than diesel because, though Alaska has plenty of crude, it is very expensive to get diesel fuel to remote villages. Diesel there today (yes Feb 2009) is around $5 per gallon (ouch!). But, the one thing that is holding back wind from becoming an even bigger piece of electricity generation is unreliable winds. Cheap energy storage is needed to smooth out the peaks and valleys.

    Hawaii is similar to Alaska, but not as extreme. It is trying to become an alternate energy economy with it’s great sun and wind resources. They are turning the once Pineapple growing only island of Lanai into a giant wind and solar farm. They will use undersea power cables to get that power to Honolulu on Oahu. Note that geothermal is mostly limited to the big island where the population is small. It is expensive to import fossil fuel to the islands so gas and diesel prices are high. Gas runs $.50 higher than the mainland (island lingo) national average. Energy storage is needed on Lanai to make full use of the undersea cables.

    Then there is the giant Texas wind farm of T. Boone Pickens and partners. Along with hundreds of wind turbines will be a coal fired and natural gas fired plant. These are needed to offset uneven winds so the expensive power lines running to cities hundreds of miles away will be fully utilized all the time. Wouldn’t it be nice to replace the coal and natural gas plants with batteries or some other type of energy storage, and put up more wind turbines?

    Feb 23 19:44 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Why Pure Play Energy Storage Companies Could Double for Investors [View article]
    John, Good reading and good points. (Are you surprised to hear that from me after our lively debate on Lithium Iron Phosphate vs Lead Carbon batteries?).

    Yes - lots of small funding is much better than large funding. I've come across hundreds of possible significant technical advancements in the alternate energy sector in the last 5 years, but no one knows what will be the 5 to 10 winners that actually make a difference in volume production. When the government picks winners and heavily pushes them, like ethanol from corn (gasp), it often has bad consequences. Let the marketplace determine the winners, but give many companies and technologies a little push. I just saw where Tesla (the electric car company) is getting $250 million to help build a factory. That's great - enough to make progress, but not enough to push out competitors.
    Feb 23 11:37 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Alternative Energy Storage: It's All About Price vs. Performance [View article]
    John Peterson says "Li-FePO4 is a wonderful and robust chemistry, production cost at the factory is in the $1,300 per kWh range in the Sandia report. "

    First, where in the Sandia report does it break out Li-FePO4 from Li-ion and say Li-FePO4 costs $1,300 per kWh? I don’t see it.

    Second, the long term price of Li-FePO4 will drop dramatically because it is a spanking new technology with strong demand. Google LiFePO4 and you will find site after site how you can upgrade Prius’, motor scooters, boats, etc to LiFePO4. One site tells how you can cannibalize many DeWalt power packs to create an electric car.

    The ultimate price, after supply catches up with demand and after the patents expire, depends on material costs, and they are very low for this battery. Don’t give me the “Lithium will be in short supply” argument either, because there are many untapped dry lake beds (like Nevada) that have good deposits of Lithium. Plus it will ultimately be extracted from the oceans.

    You can put all your lawyer spin on this all you want, but you can not give anything reasonable about the future price of LiFePO4 batteries.
    Dec 26 13:52 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Alternative Energy Storage: It's All About Price vs. Performance [View article]
    The chart above from the "July 2008 Sandia National Laboratories report" is very disappointing because it does not break out the different types of Li-ion batteries. The material costs of a Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4 - LFP) battery (the new battery in the BYD F3DM and Chevy Volt plug-in hybrids) are much lower than the Lithium Cobalt batteries in cell phones because Cobalt is expensive. The Lithium Iron Phosphate battery also lasts 4x plus longer than the Lithium Cobalt batteries so the lifetime cost is much lower.

    This article only casually mentions the Lithium Iron Phosphate battery as a new technology with potential. Do a search on “Li-FePO4”. It is disappointing it is not included in the general analysis of the article broken-out from the Li-ion battery.

    Dec 26 12:24 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Beacon: Powering Up [View article]
    Why is flywheel technology better than other technologies for storing energy? That's what holds me back in purchasing this stock. Something else could make this obsolete.
    Jul 21 11:54 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BCON by Road Runner
Comments by Ticker
AAPL, AAUKY.PK, AAV, ABAT, ABAT.OB, ABB, ABT, ACH, ACM, ACOM, ACPW, ACTS, ACXIF.PK, ADRE, AEP, AES, AFFX, AIQUY.PK, AKNS, ALTI, AMAT, AMCN, AMSC, ANEN, ANGO, AOMFF.PK, AONE, APA, APC, APD, APL, APSO.OB, APWR, ARD, AREX, ARJ, ARO, ARVCF.PK, ASTI, ATAI, ATS, ATV, AVAV, AVR, AXPW.OB, BAM, BBY, BCON, BDRAF.PK, BGC,
Road Runner's
Comments Stats
522 comments
Rating: 317 (486 - 169 )