Frankie62

Johnson & Johnson Is the Latest FDA Casualty

You may be right, cyclingscholor. FDA seems to have a cya attitude - not just for risk but also for the "consultant" doctors' piece of their pie. Many of them truly have conflicts of interest. Why would they approve a new drug or new treatment (see Provenge) which has virtually no side affects and extends life - their pharmaceutical company "consultant" ties might be negatively affected. But what patient in their right mind would choose miserable chemotherapy treatments if another less devastating immunotherapy is more effective. Let the patients decide, with their doctor's advice. And for goodness sake, separate the evaluation of headache treatments from the cancer and other life-saving treatments.

Frankie
On Nov 27 10:25 AM cyclingscholar wrote:

> How about an announcement like this:
>
> The FDA is fundamentally a flawed organization, attempting to balance
> risk and reward for drugs when this is best left to doctors, patients,
> and their families.
>
> Thus, from this point on FDA is to strictly an advisory agency. If
> they feel a drug is dangerous or ineffective, the sum total of their
> power shall be to issue the following proclamation:
>
> "WE BEAN COUNTERS AND STATISTICIANS AT FDA HAVE TESTED THIS DRUG
> AND FOUND IT INEFFECTIVE AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS. USE IT AT YOUR
> OWN RISK, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH YOUR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL." <br/>
>
> cyclingscholar