Microsoft Hires Lu, Commences Project Granola [View article]
I think this is a confirmation they remain committed to search, not a major change in strategy.
Microsoft has had a vacuum at the top of their search division for some time, this is just simply filling that spot with someone qualified for a change; nothing more.
As far as getting the good Doctor because of his involvement with project Panama -- umm, no. Project Panama is a failure which is why YHOO is in trouble with no where to go but down.
This move also highlights the fact that acquiring Yahoo would be acquiring a hollow shell. You can "rent" the main asset, search marketing share, without assuming the overhead, through management agreements.
Yahoo Destroying Shareholder Value, Internet Balance of Power [View article]
Though there is some duplication, an AOL + Yahoo ( Yaol? , Yahaol? ) merger would appear to be the only course of action for growth. Absent that, Yahoo has a good technical group, lots of Internet assets and traffic. They just need to identify a few good strategic niche areas from those assets and focus on them, they could remain profitable.
MSFT/Yahoo would have been a disaster from a business point of view, but would have bailed out those shareholders that made an untimely investment in the company.
Microsoft Hires Lu, Commences Project Granola [View article]
Microsoft has had a vacuum at the top of their search division for some time, this is just simply filling that spot with someone qualified for a change; nothing more.
As far as getting the good Doctor because of his involvement with project Panama -- umm, no. Project Panama is a failure which is why YHOO is in trouble with no where to go but down.
This move also highlights the fact that acquiring Yahoo would be acquiring a hollow shell. You can "rent" the main asset, search marketing share, without assuming the overhead, through management agreements.
Yahoo Destroying Shareholder Value, Internet Balance of Power [View article]
MSFT/Yahoo would have been a disaster from a business point of view, but would have bailed out those shareholders that made an untimely investment in the company.