Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
Am I, or the ordinary Joe the plumber, supposed to trust someone like you? After giving me minus 70 points by randomly going through my posts and giving them minus one point until my positive rankings dropped from from 97 to 20.
Or did you rely on the 'social contract' you have with your friends?
You aren't even pathetic. You don't rise to that level.
Are you trying to protect the common man from his own financial folly by demonstrating your own lack of principles?
On Mar 06 03:44 PM Thadeus Thornton III wrote:
> I guess I would be a little more broad minded here. Not ALL of the > people you label here fall into this category. Like I said, some > people need to depend on the "social" contract" of the people advising > them. And they should be able to. After all, most employers won't > offer a defined pension anymore. So an employee is left plunking > his/her money into whatever 401K plans that are offered. They have > no choice. If a person is a machinist, a nurse, a trash collector, > factory worker, etc: they have no choice and somehow are supposed > "bone up" on financial terms and the socio-political things that > affect the markets? Besides, I didn't triple or quadruple my gains > in any of my investments. And neither did anyone else I know. Most > people lost any gains of "irrational exuberance" in the stock market > "raid" of 1999 - 2001. It took me almost six yeas to get back to > even. > > -----> These 'trusting' people doubled and tripled their real 401k > wealth without doing anything except signing a few pieces of paper > > > If they were too dumb to know that there is no free lunch and just > sat on their hands while their 401k's melted like snow on the backs > of their brokers' neck, why feel sorry for them? <------ > > > ----> > The only fear I have is that these fat, lazy, greedy people will > try to stage a socialist revolution of some kind to take their property > out of foreclosure, and then find a way for government socialist > bureaucrats to save their moribund companies while forcing stock > prices to go back up so their 401k's will regain their value. < ----- > > > That term socialist gets thrown around a lot lately. To many, it > conjures up a Hitler like government and Fascism. They are two very > different things. Hitler was a fraud and used socialism as a label > to get his public to "buy into" his dictatorship. He was a fascist. > We came very close to this right after 911 and still have lingering > effects with "Homeland Security" issues. Socialism should and would > work for everyone including business. It is supposed to be a way > of fairness and leveling the playing field. At the same time, I am > not advocating it, just clearing up a common misunderstanding. Not > many people realize it, but the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin was > governed by socialist mayors from the 1930's and even going into > the early 50's I believe [google mayor Zeidler ]. It worked. The > city did well in business and employment improvements during those > hard years of depression and going into WWII.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
These 'trusting' people doubled and tripled their real 401k wealth without doing anything except signing a few pieces of paper
If they were too dumb to know that there is no free lunch and just sat on their hands while their 401k's melted like snow on the backs of their brokers' neck, why feel sorry for them?
People are still trying to sue tobacco companies for their lung cancers but most people hold back their tears and just suppress a laugh or two.
The DOW climbed from around 2000 to around 14000 and a lot of people got rich doing nothing but putting their retirement money in stocks.
Ditto for real estate which climbed, in California, during the period of about 1976-2008, from about $40,000 per house to close to $800,000 per house or about 20 times in value and speculators leveraged themselves into huge profits by leveraging their purchase anywhere from 20% down to 5% down depending on their friends in the banking business.
No one felt sorry for them on the way up and no one should feel sorry for them on the way down.
The only fear I have is that these greedy people will try to stage a socialist revolution of some kind to take their property out of foreclosure, and then find a way for government socialist bureaucrats to save their moribund companies while forcing stock prices to go back up so their 401k's will regain their value.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
The clear solution to these problems, in the U.S. at least, (since we welcome immigrants here with open arms) is to print slightly fewer visas than dollars and call the Arabs in to the rescue.
The Arabs have the money to buy GM, Citibank, GE and all our other soon to be penny stocks and take control of the United States economy.
They could also bring in their poor, huddled up and veiled masses to buy the foreclosed property.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
Or did you rely on the 'social contract' you have with your friends?
You aren't even pathetic. You don't rise to that level.
Are you trying to protect the common man from his own financial folly by demonstrating your own lack of principles?
On Mar 06 03:44 PM Thadeus Thornton III wrote:
> I guess I would be a little more broad minded here. Not ALL of the
> people you label here fall into this category. Like I said, some
> people need to depend on the "social" contract" of the people advising
> them. And they should be able to. After all, most employers won't
> offer a defined pension anymore. So an employee is left plunking
> his/her money into whatever 401K plans that are offered. They have
> no choice. If a person is a machinist, a nurse, a trash collector,
> factory worker, etc: they have no choice and somehow are supposed
> "bone up" on financial terms and the socio-political things that
> affect the markets? Besides, I didn't triple or quadruple my gains
> in any of my investments. And neither did anyone else I know. Most
> people lost any gains of "irrational exuberance" in the stock market
> "raid" of 1999 - 2001. It took me almost six yeas to get back to
> even.
>
> -----> These 'trusting' people doubled and tripled their real 401k
> wealth without doing anything except signing a few pieces of paper
>
>
> If they were too dumb to know that there is no free lunch and just
> sat on their hands while their 401k's melted like snow on the backs
> of their brokers' neck, why feel sorry for them? <------
>
>
> ---->
> The only fear I have is that these fat, lazy, greedy people will
> try to stage a socialist revolution of some kind to take their property
> out of foreclosure, and then find a way for government socialist
> bureaucrats to save their moribund companies while forcing stock
> prices to go back up so their 401k's will regain their value. < -----
>
>
> That term socialist gets thrown around a lot lately. To many, it
> conjures up a Hitler like government and Fascism. They are two very
> different things. Hitler was a fraud and used socialism as a label
> to get his public to "buy into" his dictatorship. He was a fascist.
> We came very close to this right after 911 and still have lingering
> effects with "Homeland Security" issues. Socialism should and would
> work for everyone including business. It is supposed to be a way
> of fairness and leveling the playing field. At the same time, I am
> not advocating it, just clearing up a common misunderstanding. Not
> many people realize it, but the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin was
> governed by socialist mayors from the 1930's and even going into
> the early 50's I believe [google mayor Zeidler ]. It worked. The
> city did well in business and employment improvements during those
> hard years of depression and going into WWII.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
If they were too dumb to know that there is no free lunch and just sat on their hands while their 401k's melted like snow on the backs of their brokers' neck, why feel sorry for them?
People are still trying to sue tobacco companies for their lung cancers but most people hold back their tears and just suppress a laugh or two.
The DOW climbed from around 2000 to around 14000 and a lot of people got rich doing nothing but putting their retirement money in stocks.
Ditto for real estate which climbed, in California, during the period of about 1976-2008, from about $40,000 per house to close to $800,000 per house or about 20 times in value and speculators leveraged themselves into huge profits by leveraging their purchase anywhere from 20% down to 5% down depending on their friends in the banking business.
No one felt sorry for them on the way up and no one should feel sorry for them on the way down.
The only fear I have is that these greedy people will try to stage a socialist revolution of some kind to take their property out of foreclosure, and then find a way for government socialist bureaucrats to save their moribund companies while forcing stock prices to go back up so their 401k's will regain their value.
I'm not shedding any tears, I'm watching my back.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Go Cliff Diving Again [View article]
The Arabs have the money to buy GM, Citibank, GE and all our other soon to be penny stocks and take control of the United States economy.
They could also bring in their poor, huddled up and veiled masses to buy the foreclosed property.
Don't laugh. It's against their religion.