<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rocknbob's Comments</title>
    <description>Rocknbob's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.comuser/191384/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>A Contrarian Play on Financials to Consider Just in Case</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/134256/comments?source=feed#comment-483748</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">483748</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In addition , I think close scrutiny should be paid to SRS also, since this too has been greatly oversold. The CMBS defaults are rising at a fivefold pace according to a recent article in FT, and SRS's present value at ~ 25 seems like a good entry point. The upside potential may be huge... stay tuned.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:54:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In addition , I think close scrutiny should be paid to SRS also, since this too has been greatly oversold. The CMBS defaults are rising at a fivefold pace according to a recent article in FT, and SRS's present value at ~ 25 seems like a good entry point. The upside potential may be huge... stay tuned.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Five Factors Driving the Coming 'Transparency Squeeze'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/132270/comments?source=feed#comment-474669</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">474669</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[to Jason Rines : thanks for the link!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:10:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[to Jason Rines : thanks for the link!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leveraged ETFs: Beware the Performance Conundrum</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/132329/comments?source=feed#comment-472637</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">472637</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In the short term , though , these vehicles do track and provide the exposure the investor wants. Long term , whether long or inverse ETF, the holder should be very cautious. These are not long  term financial instruments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:15:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In the short term , though , these vehicles do track and provide the exposure the investor wants. Long term , whether long or inverse ETF, the holder should be very cautious. These are not long  term financial instruments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short in May and Go Away</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/131422/comments?source=feed#comment-470054</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">470054</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[SRS , SKF and FAZ will all come back fiercely over the the next few months, as data / earnings come out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:10:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[SRS , SKF and FAZ will all come back fiercely over the the next few months, as data / earnings come out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Last Week the Markets Partied, This Week Sobriety</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/129617/comments?source=feed#comment-453068</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">453068</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for confirming with fact that very little has changed. The relaxing of mark-market rules is some of the most confounding legislation ever proposed , IMHO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:05:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for confirming with fact that very little has changed. The relaxing of mark-market rules is some of the most confounding legislation ever proposed , IMHO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Charge-off Rates Impact the UltraShort Real Estate ETF?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/126361/comments?source=feed#comment-428915</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">428915</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for a timely article...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:54:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for a timely article...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Play Falling Commercial Real Estate with SRS</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/126166/comments?source=feed#comment-427701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">427701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Lau, thank you for the treatment on this topic. Commercial real Estate is bound to continue to be under severe pressure with Mall tenants disappearing left and rightdue to economic pullback of the consumer...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:46:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Lau, thank you for the treatment on this topic. Commercial real Estate is bound to continue to be under severe pressure with Mall tenants disappearing left and rightdue to economic pullback of the consumer...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Is China Stockpiling Oil?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/124998/comments?source=feed#comment-423298</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">423298</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It wont ...not with 700T$ in derivatives outstanding...<br/><br/><br/>On Mar 10 02:38 PM pockyclips 2020 wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; Conversely, if oil prices have been falling (until very recently)<br/>&gt; while China has been tapping off the tank, what's going to happen<br/>&gt; if the world economy doesn't show drastic improvement by the summer?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It wont ...not with 700T$ in derivatives outstanding...<br/><br/><br/>On Mar 10 02:38 PM pockyclips 2020 wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; Conversely, if oil prices have been falling (until very recently)<br/>&gt; while China has been tapping off the tank, what's going to happen<br/>&gt; if the world economy doesn't show drastic improvement by the summer?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reports of Profits While Banks Fail</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/125516/comments?source=feed#comment-423198</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">423198</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you Mr. Browne for a very analytical post. Plausible numbers...albeit gloomy ones...I say invest in SKF and SRS for good entry and exit points...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:26:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you Mr. Browne for a very analytical post. Plausible numbers...albeit gloomy ones...I say invest in SKF and SRS for good entry and exit points...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Financial ETFs to Watch This Week</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/123848/comments?source=feed#comment-411303</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">411303</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe it would also be good to watch SRS this week.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:19:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe it would also be good to watch SRS this week.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Death of the Big Bank Model</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/123716/comments?source=feed#comment-410602</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">410602</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We certainly do not need 8000 or so number of banks in the US. Consolidate, go bankcrupt, whatever...just dont become a parasite on the American taxpayer ad infinitum....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:46:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We certainly do not need 8000 or so number of banks in the US. Consolidate, go bankcrupt, whatever...just dont become a parasite on the American taxpayer ad infinitum....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P Lowers Insurers Ratings, What About Banks' $400B CMBS Losses?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/123097/comments?source=feed#comment-405482</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">405482</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ Mr. Kelly,<br/>Correct me if Im wrong , your first graph shows almost constant CMBS ownership/distribution from Q107 thru Q308. If thats true, then you're assuming the net # of CMBS issued increased during the time. <br/><br/>your statement &quot;The chart illustrates that commercial banks have not only been the largest holders of commercial mortgages, but they have been increasing their exposure even during the economic crisis.&quot; indicates this. <br/><br/>Maybe you could indicate whether the absolute amount of CMBS issued increased.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:01:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ Mr. Kelly,<br/>Correct me if Im wrong , your first graph shows almost constant CMBS ownership/distribution from Q107 thru Q308. If thats true, then you're assuming the net # of CMBS issued increased during the time. <br/><br/>your statement &quot;The chart illustrates that commercial banks have not only been the largest holders of commercial mortgages, but they have been increasing their exposure even during the economic crisis.&quot; indicates this. <br/><br/>Maybe you could indicate whether the absolute amount of CMBS issued increased.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Housing Bubble: The Sequel</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/122029/comments?source=feed#comment-399722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">399722</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Two year rise in real estate values ?? Are you kidding? this &quot;bubble&quot; will last for a week , if that. I say stay in SRS, ride it out, and you'll benefit in the coming weeks/months...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:58:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Two year rise in real estate values ?? Are you kidding? this &quot;bubble&quot; will last for a week , if that. I say stay in SRS, ride it out, and you'll benefit in the coming weeks/months...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit from the Housing Mess with ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/120181/comments?source=feed#comment-391153</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">391153</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice article...... I a m long SRS and have a small profit take point of 89. I appreciate the study of the stochastics , which, combined with the commercial RE environment BEGINNING to deteriorate, could mean a roar from these levels to 100... My only hope in an economy such as this...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:34:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice article...... I a m long SRS and have a small profit take point of 89. I appreciate the study of the stochastics , which, combined with the commercial RE environment BEGINNING to deteriorate, could mean a roar from these levels to 100... My only hope in an economy such as this...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Dangers of Leveraged ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/120678/comments?source=feed#comment-391145</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">391145</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[the referenced ETFs, DUG, UNG and USO are not leveraged, i believe , since they are meant to track variatiions in Oill and Nat Gas on a 1 :1 basis.How can they be? Are the references in the title erroneous? Am I wrong?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:24:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[the referenced ETFs, DUG, UNG and USO are not leveraged, i believe , since they are meant to track variatiions in Oill and Nat Gas on a 1 :1 basis.How can they be? Are the references in the title erroneous? Am I wrong?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Credit Default Swaps: The Show Isn't Over</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/95755/comments?source=feed#comment-382522</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">382522</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[what a &quot;current event&quot; question. Id love to answer you, but, that info is probably VERY confidential....<br/><br/><br/>On Oct 01 06:30 AM currious phil wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; Can anyone tell me where to go to see the current CDS values for<br/>&gt; various banks ?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:44:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[what a &quot;current event&quot; question. Id love to answer you, but, that info is probably VERY confidential....<br/><br/><br/>On Oct 01 06:30 AM currious phil wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; Can anyone tell me where to go to see the current CDS values for<br/>&gt; various banks ?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The $60 Trillion Nightmare of Credit Default Swaps</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/99027/comments?source=feed#comment-382494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">382494</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To cz : thanks . <br/>Seems unfair that the 'true&quot; figure lent or awarded to/for banks is 20% less tha the passed bill/law(s) .... Im beginning to lose track of the number of programs out there and which ones are funded / started ??!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:30:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To cz : thanks . <br/>Seems unfair that the 'true&quot; figure lent or awarded to/for banks is 20% less tha the passed bill/law(s) .... Im beginning to lose track of the number of programs out there and which ones are funded / started ??!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama 'Shines' Natural Gas</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/116684/comments?source=feed#comment-367373</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">367373</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Your document of nat gas refeuling stations is a non link. I suggest you fix it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:37:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Your document of nat gas refeuling stations is a non link. I suggest you fix it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Natural Gas Continues to Head Lower</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/116481/comments?source=feed#comment-366626</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">366626</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Or to rephrase your title: <br/>And/or Oil Will Grind Higher..<br/>Ratios tell us nothing concrete about absolute values. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:39:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Or to rephrase your title: <br/>And/or Oil Will Grind Higher..<br/>Ratios tell us nothing concrete about absolute values. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Solar and Suntech Power to Build Solar Farm in Abu Dhabi</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/115911/comments?source=feed#comment-364035</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">364035</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[to gebby; <br/>Its too bad its so expensive when compared with oil.... at 40 50 or 80 bucks a barrel. We have oil for another 50 years. like Social Security in the US. nothing will be attempted till the &quot; 11th hour&quot;. thats the reality.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:02:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[to gebby; <br/>Its too bad its so expensive when compared with oil.... at 40 50 or 80 bucks a barrel. We have oil for another 50 years. like Social Security in the US. nothing will be attempted till the &quot; 11th hour&quot;. thats the reality.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seven New Developments in Renewable Energy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/113185/comments?source=feed#comment-346463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">346463</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bravo and hats off to billp37 !   power must be defined over time to be truly useful..<br/>From all us electrical engineers out there (r there any others left?) Thanks!!<br/><br/><br/><br/>On Jan 05 09:42 AM billp37 wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; &quot;The plant will have a capacity of 400 megawatts according to a Bloomberg<br/>&gt; report.&quot; ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;total annual production capacity of over 1,125MW of wind turbines&quot;<br/>&gt; ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;66MW on-grid photovoltaic project&quot;  ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;China's wind energy capacity has reached 1GW in 2008&quot; ....<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;generate 3.6 gigawatts of energy which could provide power for up<br/>&gt; to 5m homes from 2012&quot;<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; Peak generating capability is important.<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; But we think the concept of CAPACITY FACTOR is also important.<br/><br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp'>www.google.com/search?...</a>;q=capacity+factor+def...<br/><br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; Fine to report kilo-, mega-, or gigwatts but kilo-, mega-, gigawatt<br/>&gt; HOURS probably should be reported too?<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:57:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bravo and hats off to billp37 !   power must be defined over time to be truly useful..<br/>From all us electrical engineers out there (r there any others left?) Thanks!!<br/><br/><br/><br/>On Jan 05 09:42 AM billp37 wrote:<br/><br/>&gt; &quot;The plant will have a capacity of 400 megawatts according to a Bloomberg<br/>&gt; report.&quot; ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;total annual production capacity of over 1,125MW of wind turbines&quot;<br/>&gt; ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;66MW on-grid photovoltaic project&quot;  ...<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;China's wind energy capacity has reached 1GW in 2008&quot; ....<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; &quot;generate 3.6 gigawatts of energy which could provide power for up<br/>&gt; to 5m homes from 2012&quot;<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; Peak generating capability is important.<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; But we think the concept of CAPACITY FACTOR is also important.<br/><br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp'>www.google.com/search?...</a>;q=capacity+factor+def...<br/><br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; Fine to report kilo-, mega-, or gigwatts but kilo-, mega-, gigawatt<br/>&gt; HOURS probably should be reported too?<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suntech Power: Now a Takeover Target</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/109877/comments?source=feed#comment-324601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">324601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I see no mention of the licensing agreement with Open Energy Corp . OEGY  and Suntech. This would add BIPV to Suntechs manufacturing portfolio. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:17:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I see no mention of the licensing agreement with Open Energy Corp . OEGY  and Suntech. This would add BIPV to Suntechs manufacturing portfolio. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suntech Power: Now a Takeover Target</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/109877/comments?source=feed#comment-324595</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">324595</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[to oneal:<br/> I agree . I doubt very much if 50% energy conversion to electricity was meant. 50% up from 22% is still quite laudable, if true. (~33%?)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:13:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[to oneal:<br/> I agree . I doubt very much if 50% energy conversion to electricity was meant. 50% up from 22% is still quite laudable, if true. (~33%?)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Perversion of American Capitalism</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/104120/comments?source=feed#comment-298484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">298484</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Sanaullah,  i agree with most of your premises , except that part about inflation . If we proceed on the present path , we will inevitably end up with deflation, as money becomes cheap, it will be hoarded, rather than lent/ borrowed. This should counter the inflation you refer to, and possibly the need to invest/ hide in precious metals.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:32:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Sanaullah,  i agree with most of your premises , except that part about inflation . If we proceed on the present path , we will inevitably end up with deflation, as money becomes cheap, it will be hoarded, rather than lent/ borrowed. This should counter the inflation you refer to, and possibly the need to invest/ hide in precious metals.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding the TED Spread</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/45987/comments?source=feed#comment-283971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">283971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Question: Why do borrowing eurodollars (futures) have to do necessarily with corporate borrowing?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:47:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Question: Why do borrowing eurodollars (futures) have to do necessarily with corporate borrowing?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The $60 Trillion Nightmare of Credit Default Swaps</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/99027/comments?source=feed#comment-277121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">277121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[hey CZ:<br/>Sorry for being stupid, but whats the rake you speak of? Is that the amount the gov't bumped up the package? ?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:08:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[hey CZ:<br/>Sorry for being stupid, but whats the rake you speak of? Is that the amount the gov't bumped up the package? ?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The $60 Trillion Nightmare of Credit Default Swaps</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/99027/comments?source=feed#comment-276775</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">276775</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Jefferson:<br/> Id like to know what percentage of the $60T CDSs out there are naked. These are the ones that are troublesome since they are /were written without owning any security.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:29:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Jefferson:<br/> Id like to know what percentage of the $60T CDSs out there are naked. These are the ones that are troublesome since they are /were written without owning any security.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Here Go the Short ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/96387/comments?source=feed#comment-259293</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259293</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[to DaveW: good buy ! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:49:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[to DaveW: good buy ! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commodities Meltdown as Dollar Surges</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/95078/comments?source=feed#comment-252499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">252499</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[to bowman 711: you make a lot of sense ; people get a false sense of security just before the election, benchmarks soar for a while, then a reversion to a sinking dollar and higher comm prices may take over , maybe even before years end...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:07:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[to bowman 711: you make a lot of sense ; people get a false sense of security just before the election, benchmarks soar for a while, then a reversion to a sinking dollar and higher comm prices may take over , maybe even before years end...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Up with ETFs is Hard To Do</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/94254/comments?source=feed#comment-248510</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">248510</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[UNG has to be a bargain at these levels. Of course I bought in a lot higher not realizing the slowdown would hit all/most energy equities . I feel the same way about KOL, the coal company tracking ETF (Stowe index)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[UNG has to be a bargain at these levels. Of course I bought in a lot higher not realizing the slowdown would hit all/most energy equities . I feel the same way about KOL, the coal company tracking ETF (Stowe index)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
