<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Dividends4Life's Comments</title>
    <description>Dividends4Life's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/191745/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>7 Select High Yield S&amp;P 500 Dividend Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1463551/comments?source=feed#comment-19320711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19320711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The screen criteria sentence should read as follows:<br/><br/>&quot;This week week, I screened my dividend growth stocks database for stocks that are members of the S&amp;P 500, have a yield of 4% or more and have increased their dividend for 10 or more consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>It incorrectly says 5% in the article above. I started with 5%, but nothing relevant was returned, then I lowered it to 4%. SA picked up the article from my site before I made the correction.<br/><br/>My apologies for any confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 10:39:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The screen criteria sentence should read as follows:<br/><br/>&quot;This week week, I screened my dividend growth stocks database for stocks that are members of the S&amp;P 500, have a yield of 4% or more and have increased their dividend for 10 or more consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>It incorrectly says 5% in the article above. I started with 5%, but nothing relevant was returned, then I lowered it to 4%. SA picked up the article from my site before I made the correction.<br/><br/>My apologies for any confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Johnson &amp; Johnson Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1446251/comments?source=feed#comment-19020101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19020101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[b10845:<br/><br/>The $117.37 is a sensitivity. The price &quot;could&quot; increase to $117.37 and the NPV MMA Differential would still be above my required $500 given the current dividend growth rate.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:53:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[b10845:<br/><br/>The $117.37 is a sensitivity. The price &quot;could&quot; increase to $117.37 and the NPV MMA Differential would still be above my required $500 given the current dividend growth rate.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Occidental Petroleum: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428791/comments?source=feed#comment-18788241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18788241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Rose_Colored_Glasses:  I am long COP, but if I had to buy one tomorrow, it would be OXY. <br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:44:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Rose_Colored_Glasses:  I am long COP, but if I had to buy one tomorrow, it would be OXY. <br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top And Bottom Performing Dividend Stocks (Q1, 2013)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383451/comments?source=feed#comment-18293051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18293051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Igneous: I would like to see a decline in AFL and several other stocks. I love it when what I am buying goes on sale with no change to the underlying fundamentals.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:25:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Igneous: I would like to see a decline in AFL and several other stocks. I love it when what I am buying goes on sale with no change to the underlying fundamentals.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walgreen: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1321071/comments?source=feed#comment-17283371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17283371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[SA doesn't always include all my links. Here is a link to the original article with all the links in place:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12rwenH'>http://bit.ly/12rwenH</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:51:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[SA doesn't always include all my links. Here is a link to the original article with all the links in place:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12rwenH'>http://bit.ly/12rwenH</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cincinnati Financial Corp: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1272831/comments?source=feed#comment-16317331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16317331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bishophicks: You are correct. The $49.94 should be $39.94.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:55:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bishophicks: You are correct. The $49.94 should be $39.94.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 Dividend Stocks Trading At A Double-Digit Discount</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1265731/comments?source=feed#comment-16191411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16191411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Stoic Perspectives:<br/><br/>It should be: &quot;increased its dividend payments for 12 consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>Sorry for the confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:06:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Stoic Perspectives:<br/><br/>It should be: &quot;increased its dividend payments for 12 consecutive years.&quot;<br/><br/>Sorry for the confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AT&amp;T: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1220411/comments?source=feed#comment-15485391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15485391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[heglimp: I never sell a stock on valuation alone. Sometimes a high valuation will mess up the dividend fundamentals, then I will sell. For more info see:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/z29I5r'>http://bit.ly/z29I5r</a><br/><br/>I sold my CTL position.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[heglimp: I never sell a stock on valuation alone. Sometimes a high valuation will mess up the dividend fundamentals, then I will sell. For more info see:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/z29I5r'>http://bit.ly/z29I5r</a><br/><br/>I sold my CTL position.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Income Progress Update - January 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/191745-dividends4life/1534921-dividend-income-progress-update-january-2013?source=feed#comment-14792411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14792411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[kolpin: I don't report income for individual months. Quarterly, I will report what I earn over the last 3 months.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:03:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[kolpin: I don't report income for individual months. Quarterly, I will report what I earn over the last 3 months.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are The Dividends Safe For These High-Yielding Stocks?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1139771/comments?source=feed#comment-14328881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14328881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[nutrosa: Here is an informative article on the Do's and Don'ts of IRA Investing. Search for &quot;Master Limited Partnerships&quot; if you want to skip to that section (toward the bottom).<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YS75zd'>http://bit.ly/YS75zd</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:46:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[nutrosa: Here is an informative article on the Do's and Don'ts of IRA Investing. Search for &quot;Master Limited Partnerships&quot; if you want to skip to that section (toward the bottom).<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YS75zd'>http://bit.ly/YS75zd</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wells Fargo: This Buffett Stock Is Back With A Vengeance, Raising Its Dividend 14%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1133841/comments?source=feed#comment-14168661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14168661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dr. Roberts: Much of what you said is correct. However, Mr. Kovacevich said he was compelled to take the money due to the pending Wachovia acquisition. <br/><br/>Companies are judged on results. The reality is that income investors in WFC (I held WFC at the time) saw a decline in their earnings due to the WFC dividend cut, in return WFC was allowed to close its acquisition. Not all banks chose to take TARP funds they 'didn't want or need.'<br/><br/>Here is a link to Richard Kovacevich's discussion of the situation. It is an interesting video:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/UqOyeP'>http://bit.ly/UqOyeP</a>#!<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:24:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dr. Roberts: Much of what you said is correct. However, Mr. Kovacevich said he was compelled to take the money due to the pending Wachovia acquisition. <br/><br/>Companies are judged on results. The reality is that income investors in WFC (I held WFC at the time) saw a decline in their earnings due to the WFC dividend cut, in return WFC was allowed to close its acquisition. Not all banks chose to take TARP funds they 'didn't want or need.'<br/><br/>Here is a link to Richard Kovacevich's discussion of the situation. It is an interesting video:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/UqOyeP'>http://bit.ly/UqOyeP</a>#!<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 High-Rated, Lower-Debt Dividend Stocks With A Reasonable Payout</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1099821/comments?source=feed#comment-13499311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13499311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[BruceCM: Good point. I am looking at building a trending database for this type of situation.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:10:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[BruceCM: Good point. I am looking at building a trending database for this type of situation.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 High-Rated, Lower-Debt Dividend Stocks With A Reasonable Payout</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1099821/comments?source=feed#comment-13499201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13499201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[RSRinehart: I run the screen and write the article, then right before publication  I update the yields; hence the decline in ADP.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:08:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[RSRinehart: I run the screen and write the article, then right before publication  I update the yields; hence the decline in ADP.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>November 2012 Pocket Change Portfolio Performance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/191745-dividends4life/1395131-november-2012-pocket-change-portfolio-performance?source=feed#comment-12914471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12914471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Rudester: I will hold ABT and evaluate both pieces after the split.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:52:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Rudester: I will hold ABT and evaluate both pieces after the split.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Secret Ingredient Of Dividend Growth Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1030011/comments?source=feed#comment-11998331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11998331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@ScottHB: Inflation is important, but not something that should dominate everything that is written. Inflation is a complex topic. Those that use CPI, GDP or similar to make inflation adjustments are missing the complexity of real inflation. To simulate inflation on your investment, see my D4L-Inflation.xls model and accompanying article here:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ss8AsW'>http://bit.ly/ss8AsW</a> <br/><br/>@David: To simplify the example I included the statement above &quot;where earnings in both are withdrawn when paid:&quot; to avoid dividend repurchases. If both dividends and interest were reinvested, you would introduce another variable - market volatility.<br/><br/>YOC is best used to demonstrate dividend growth over time vs. a fixed income option such as a CD or Bond. You are correct it should not be used to make forward looking decisions.<br/><br/>@Others: Historical share prices have been adjusted for stock splits.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:53:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@ScottHB: Inflation is important, but not something that should dominate everything that is written. Inflation is a complex topic. Those that use CPI, GDP or similar to make inflation adjustments are missing the complexity of real inflation. To simulate inflation on your investment, see my D4L-Inflation.xls model and accompanying article here:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ss8AsW'>http://bit.ly/ss8AsW</a> <br/><br/>@David: To simplify the example I included the statement above &quot;where earnings in both are withdrawn when paid:&quot; to avoid dividend repurchases. If both dividends and interest were reinvested, you would introduce another variable - market volatility.<br/><br/>YOC is best used to demonstrate dividend growth over time vs. a fixed income option such as a CD or Bond. You are correct it should not be used to make forward looking decisions.<br/><br/>@Others: Historical share prices have been adjusted for stock splits.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerson Electric Has Raised Its Dividend For 56 Consecutive Years</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/995891/comments?source=feed#comment-11438871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11438871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[heglimp: Thank you for your kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:19:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[heglimp: Thank you for your kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PepsiCo Inc.: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/989641/comments?source=feed#comment-11377261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11377261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[L1329-8: you are correct. That was a typo on my part - I picked up the wrong line from my model.<br/><br/>Thanks for pointing it out.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:50:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[L1329-8: you are correct. That was a typo on my part - I picked up the wrong line from my model.<br/><br/>Thanks for pointing it out.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Dividend Stocks To Buy And Hold, Not Buy And Forget</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/981511/comments?source=feed#comment-11278691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11278691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[FleetUSA3226: I add the dividends earned each month to new cash and buy the best available stock, within my allocation.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:29:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[FleetUSA3226: I add the dividends earned each month to new cash and buy the best available stock, within my allocation.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Erie Indemnity Company: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/949011/comments?source=feed#comment-10901041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10901041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Robert,<br/><br/>It won't be the last time I was wrong. :) <br/><br/>BTW, your website is really good! I've added it as one of my sources.<br/><br/>Best Wishes, <br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Robert,<br/><br/>It won't be the last time I was wrong. :) <br/><br/>BTW, your website is really good! I've added it as one of my sources.<br/><br/>Best Wishes, <br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Erie Indemnity Company: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/949011/comments?source=feed#comment-10890341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10890341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Robert Allan Schwartz: With no debt and tiny FCF payout the company could easily increase the level of dividends paid.<br/><br/>@greg.stanford: You are correct the math does not work. I pulled the 22 years from David Fish's Dividend Champions spreadsheet. Another of my sources shows 16 years of increase, which I believe is correct in this instance. Thanks for pointing this out.<br/><br/>@heglimp: Thanks for the kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:43:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Robert Allan Schwartz: With no debt and tiny FCF payout the company could easily increase the level of dividends paid.<br/><br/>@greg.stanford: You are correct the math does not work. I pulled the 22 years from David Fish's Dividend Champions spreadsheet. Another of my sources shows 16 years of increase, which I believe is correct in this instance. Thanks for pointing this out.<br/><br/>@heglimp: Thanks for the kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Dividend Stocks That Balance Yield And Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/925911/comments?source=feed#comment-10574421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10574421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Here is an explanation as to how I calculate dividend growth rate, and other metrics:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/SY0GD9'>http://bit.ly/SY0GD9</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:11:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Here is an explanation as to how I calculate dividend growth rate, and other metrics:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/SY0GD9'>http://bit.ly/SY0GD9</a><br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Profit From Real Estate With No Stopped Up Toilet Calls</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/920521/comments?source=feed#comment-10496181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10496181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Johnson: Sorry for the confusion.  The article is about stocks recently increasing their dividends, including REITs and a discussion about REITs.<br/><br/>The article discusses what a REIT is then says:<br/><br/>&quot;Below are three REITs yielding over 7% that have recently increased their cash dividends to shareholders:&quot;<br/><br/>It then list 3 REITS: Hospitality Properties Trust (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpt' title='Hospitality Properties Trust'>HPT</a>),  Select Income REIT (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/nbBtW4'>http://bit.ly/nbBtW4</a>) and Senior Housing Properties Trust (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/oGJRNo'>http://bit.ly/oGJRNo</a>).<br/><br/>It then says:<br/><br/>&quot;Below are several other companies that have recently increased their cash dividends to shareholders:&quot;<br/><br/>Then lists the companies you described above.<br/><br/>Again, sorry for the confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:24:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Johnson: Sorry for the confusion.  The article is about stocks recently increasing their dividends, including REITs and a discussion about REITs.<br/><br/>The article discusses what a REIT is then says:<br/><br/>&quot;Below are three REITs yielding over 7% that have recently increased their cash dividends to shareholders:&quot;<br/><br/>It then list 3 REITS: Hospitality Properties Trust (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpt' title='Hospitality Properties Trust'>HPT</a>),  Select Income REIT (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/nbBtW4'>http://bit.ly/nbBtW4</a>) and Senior Housing Properties Trust (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/oGJRNo'>http://bit.ly/oGJRNo</a>).<br/><br/>It then says:<br/><br/>&quot;Below are several other companies that have recently increased their cash dividends to shareholders:&quot;<br/><br/>Then lists the companies you described above.<br/><br/>Again, sorry for the confusion.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walgreen: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/910201/comments?source=feed#comment-10332211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10332211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All: Don't forget to read the last paragraph, which states in part:<br/><br/>&quot;The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true.&quot;<br/><br/>I find it better to have a set baseline calculation and then question the data that goes into the baseline calculation. In this case, I don't think WAG will be in a position to grow its dividend in the future as fast as it has in the past.<br/><br/>The yield is not a current yield, but a current &quot;year&quot; yield which includes dividends paid at lower levels prior to the current increase.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:22:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All: Don't forget to read the last paragraph, which states in part:<br/><br/>&quot;The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true.&quot;<br/><br/>I find it better to have a set baseline calculation and then question the data that goes into the baseline calculation. In this case, I don't think WAG will be in a position to grow its dividend in the future as fast as it has in the past.<br/><br/>The yield is not a current yield, but a current &quot;year&quot; yield which includes dividends paid at lower levels prior to the current increase.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Income Progress Update - September 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/191745-dividends4life/1146121-dividend-income-progress-update-september-2012?source=feed#comment-10277671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10277671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[bluesmoke: I have not bought PFF for quite some time and will like;ly remove it from my DG portfolio in the future.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:48:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[bluesmoke: I have not bought PFF for quite some time and will like;ly remove it from my DG portfolio in the future.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Income Progress Update - August 2012 </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/191745-dividends4life/1051111-dividend-income-progress-update-august-2012?source=feed#comment-9381851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9381851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[kolpin: I have an elaborate trending model where I take past results and model them into the future. I then make adjustments for known changes. So far I have tracked fairly close to my model. Though, at the current rate, I should hit my 2017 goal in 2015.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:50:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[kolpin: I have an elaborate trending model where I take past results and model them into the future. I then make adjustments for known changes. So far I have tracked fairly close to my model. Though, at the current rate, I should hit my 2017 goal in 2015.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illinois Tool Works Inc.: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/837771/comments?source=feed#comment-8983151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8983151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Toasty54: SA only picks up select articles from my site (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/NBrdGu'>http://bit.ly/NBrdGu</a>). As SA has grown and the Dividend &amp; Income contributors have grown, SA picks up fewer of my articles. <br/><br/>As for a weekly YouTube analysis, I am pretty stretched as it is now. I don't want to cut into my analysis time. :)<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:03:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Toasty54: SA only picks up select articles from my site (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/NBrdGu'>http://bit.ly/NBrdGu</a>). As SA has grown and the Dividend &amp; Income contributors have grown, SA picks up fewer of my articles. <br/><br/>As for a weekly YouTube analysis, I am pretty stretched as it is now. I don't want to cut into my analysis time. :)<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illinois Tool Works Inc.: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/837771/comments?source=feed#comment-8972601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8972601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Armistead: The $41.33 is what ITW is worth to me at the current dividend and dividend growth rate.<br/><br/> I don't spend much time on the P&amp;L but focus my attention on the cash flow statement and balance sheet (too many &quot;junk&quot; accounting standards have made the P&amp;L earnings questionable).<br/><br/>Generally, when a stock is in the position of ITW, it doesn't become a buy by dropping down to my price, but instead by increasing its dividend and dividend growth rate and raising my price.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Armistead: The $41.33 is what ITW is worth to me at the current dividend and dividend growth rate.<br/><br/> I don't spend much time on the P&amp;L but focus my attention on the cash flow statement and balance sheet (too many &quot;junk&quot; accounting standards have made the P&amp;L earnings questionable).<br/><br/>Generally, when a stock is in the position of ITW, it doesn't become a buy by dropping down to my price, but instead by increasing its dividend and dividend growth rate and raising my price.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illinois Tool Works Inc.: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/837771/comments?source=feed#comment-8946711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8946711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bruce7b: Welcome to the Dividend &amp; Income section. It took me a moment to figure out what you were talking about.  Most dividend growth investors do not sell a stock just because it is overvalued - we just don't add to our position. Forever, is our preferred holding period. <br/><br/>I sometime forget other types of investors see this differently and trade more frequently. Here is a link that describes when I sell a stock:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/z29I5r'>http://bit.ly/z29I5r</a><br/><br/>I cant speak for other dividend growth investors, but I have found most follow a similar methodology.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:12:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bruce7b: Welcome to the Dividend &amp; Income section. It took me a moment to figure out what you were talking about.  Most dividend growth investors do not sell a stock just because it is overvalued - we just don't add to our position. Forever, is our preferred holding period. <br/><br/>I sometime forget other types of investors see this differently and trade more frequently. Here is a link that describes when I sell a stock:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/z29I5r'>http://bit.ly/z29I5r</a><br/><br/>I cant speak for other dividend growth investors, but I have found most follow a similar methodology.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Air Products and Chemicals Inc. Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/731581/comments?source=feed#comment-7539221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7539221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ritaillinois: Thanks for your kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:48:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ritaillinois: Thanks for your kind words.<br/><br/>Best Wishes,<br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/702721/comments?source=feed#comment-7081131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7081131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The disclosure should read:<br/><br/>At the time of this writing, I was long in COP (4.3% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio).<br/><br/>D4L]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:16:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The disclosure should read:<br/><br/>At the time of this writing, I was long in COP (4.3% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio).<br/><br/>D4L]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
