The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
market authors
selected for publication
optionsgirl
»
Comments
|
You are currently following optionsgirl
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following optionsgirl
-
732
)
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedConsumer Credit Down - But Does It Show Deleveraging? [View article]
Quickchat #15: Starts 11/8/09 [View instapost]
On Nov 08 07:00 PM tripleblack wrote:
> Interesting. Would they have to pay the same big fee if they re-apply?
> That process could get expensive for a startup!
PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 policy, pay 2.5% of income, or Go To Jail!!! [View instapost]
Quickchat #15: Starts 11/8/09 [View instapost]
"I would now like to discuss the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee program. The Renewable Fuels Association, wrote Secretary Chu to express its concerns about the direction of the DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program, citing systemic issues with its evaluation of emerging biofuels technologies. In that letter, which is available for you to review on its website, the RFA suggested that the DOE is applying standards for mature renewable technologies such as wind and solar to advanced biofuels technologies that are not realistic for projects tied to the commodity driven fuels industry.
Specifically, the RFA suggested that the DOE is requiring life of loan product off-take agreements, however such off-take agreements are inconsistent with the practice in the U.S. transportation fuels industry. The DOE is requiring higher levels of equity from emerging technology companies than for projects with mature technology; the DOE is requiring a BB credit rating, which according to Standard & Poor’s is higher than 63% of all U.S. corporate first time issuers since 2007; and the DOE is requiring all project applicants to reapply, rather than giving applicants the ability to address the DOE’s concerns, which requires among other additional costs, a completely new 75 to $125,000 application fee and significantly delays the projects in question.
With respect to Dynamic Fuels’ application, it has received notice from the DOE that its application was rejected on grounds substantially similar to those cited above by the RFA. The DOE listed the following additional areas of concern; firm supply and off-take agreements which effectively fix the project’s margin, contracts which are not typical of either the feedstock supply or transportation fuels markets; and a fixed price EPC contract, which is not realistic for emerging technology. In its application, Dynamic Fuels indicated that its construction strategy would be substantially similar to that being employed at its Geismar project, which is currently on budget and 76% complete.
While the DOE has invited Dynamic Fuels to reapply, Dynamic Fuels has not determined at this time whether it intends to do so. Dynamic Fuels is evaluating other avenues to finance a second plant and its near term focus is to complete the Geismar plant and bring it to full commercial operation in 2010."
Quick Chat #14- Start 11/5/09 [View instapost]
Goodbye Government Healthcare Goodbye Cap N Trade [View instapost]
Regulation Must Be a Problem - Get Rid of It [View instapost]
Why do I think it is a disaster?
Because it has done nothing to prevent fraud, which is pervasive, as you document almost daily.
The Hindenburg Omen (Extended) [View instapost]
I think SA has given us a wonderful platform that they have expanded and supported. I am very grateful that they were able to fend off the cyberspace attack, no doubt at personal sacrifice and financial, too.
I also think that the politics we have been discussing is important because the political climate has changed our investment choices.
As passionate, opinionated people, we are bound to disagree. That's OK with me. What bothers me are racial slurs, religious slurs, and the like. However, I do not believe in censorship, only self-censorship. It is only by people saying their peace that we recognize those we wish to associate with from those who have no place in our space.
I have invited you into my personal space and I am delighted with the interaction.
Al Gore could become world's first carbon billionaire [View instapost]
On Nov 06 05:08 PM tripleblack wrote:
> I love history references. If we spent more time learning applicable
> history, and less time listening to politicians, we would be much
> better off (and more likely to be doing smart things in the here
> and now).
Quick Chat #14- Start 11/5/09 [View instapost]
On Nov 06 04:51 PM Freya wrote:
> OG, is this a renamed THPW,
>
> LTBR, let me look at it. It would really screw the Iranians into
> the Ground to be forced to use Thorium. No legitimate reason for
> uranium enrichment.
>
> I'm going nowhere til 11/11. Wedding, Family and friends, about 80
> of us. Bride and Groom both live in Vegas.
>
> Handy little program, SpeedFan, speeds up the fans as needed.
What's On Your Wish List? [View instapost]
On Nov 06 03:10 PM robert.b.ferguson wrote:
> If the scenario laid out by yellow hoard is the catalyst I would
> short uncle buck and buy tax exempt munnies and Brazilian telecoms
> like (VIV)
Al Gore could become world's first carbon billionaire [View instapost]
For a fantastic article on the history of energy innovation in the 19th century (when crude became an alternative to whale oil, among many other simultaneous developments) and the parallels today, I liked reading The Objective Standard, Vol. 4 No. 2, Summer 2009 edition. The essay is entitled:
"Energy At the Speed of Thought" by Alex Epstein.
Quick Chat #14- Start 11/5/09 [View instapost]
www.zerohedge.com/arti...
Quick Chat #14- Start 11/5/09 [View instapost]
ir.ltbridge.com/phoeni...=
Al Gore could become world's first carbon billionaire [View instapost]
www.syntroleum.com/mai...
www.methanex.com/
www.corning.com/index....
www.tetratech.com/port.../
www.nwpipe.com/