Why Leveraged ETFs Are Bound to Deteriorate [View article]
You obviously did not read the article closely enough. The author was saying that if the index fell to 900 and the 3X fell to 700 an 11.11% increase in the index back to 1000 would not be sufficient to return to 3X to 1000. It would take an increase of 14.283% in the index equivalent to an increase in the 3X of 42.85% to return the 3X to 1000. While your math is OK, your reading comprehension is not.
On Jul 15 08:58 PM mwfall wrote:
> THE AUTHOR IS 100% WRONG. HIS ARTICLE IS WORTHLESS AND HE'S A MATH > DUNCE. > > HERE'S HIS MISTAKE: > > take the triple levereged one. > when it goes from 100 to 70 the percentage loss is calculated by > dividing 30 into 100 equals 30% (he was right on that one) > when it goes from 70 to 100 the percentage gain is calculated by > dividing 30 into 70 equals 42.85% gain !!
Why Leveraged ETFs Are Bound to Deteriorate [View article]
On Jul 15 08:58 PM mwfall wrote:
> THE AUTHOR IS 100% WRONG. HIS ARTICLE IS WORTHLESS AND HE'S A MATH
> DUNCE.
>
> HERE'S HIS MISTAKE:
>
> take the triple levereged one.
> when it goes from 100 to 70 the percentage loss is calculated by
> dividing 30 into 100 equals 30% (he was right on that one)
> when it goes from 70 to 100 the percentage gain is calculated by
> dividing 30 into 70 equals 42.85% gain !!