19709

50 Four-Day September Expiration Option Ideas

The article was published on 9/15 as indicated at the top and confirmed by the author's statement that there were 4 days left to options expiration which was on 9/18.


On Sep 15 09:42 PM S2009 wrote:

> The table is incomplete, no price at the time of publication or no
> bid/ask for options. So if you do not see this table exactly at the
> moment of publication (which is not shown, is it Sep 2009 or Jan
> 2007 - nobody knows) it is basically useless.

Banking on Banks: Detailed Option Strangle Strategy

Tsk tsk tsk. If you don't like the market, you don't have to participate.


On Aug 26 08:15 AM apppro wrote:

> These types of trades & trading are actually what is 'STRANGLING'
> our markets and society as a whole. All this options trading has
> turned into a ponzi gambling scheme that will crash our system and
> adds NOTHING now. They say it adds liquidity - BS! If anything all
> that money being thrown about on ultra short term trades is NOT being
> invested on long-term basis.. it actually takes money OUT of the
> pool and contributes NOTHING to our economy - ever.
>
> We need to figure out a way to stop all this insanity and not come
> up with new methods on how to make it worse. I am still convinced
> that the best way is to TAX these trades as if they were gambling
> wins somewhere around 50%. That'll stop it, and even if it doesn't
> it will help pay for the mess all these trader's/traitor's insanity
> cause.

Why Leveraged ETFs Are Bound to Deteriorate

You obviously did not read the article closely enough. The author was saying that if the index fell to 900 and the 3X fell to 700 an 11.11% increase in the index back to 1000 would not be sufficient to return to 3X to 1000. It would take an increase of 14.283% in the index equivalent to an increase in the 3X of 42.85% to return the 3X to 1000. While your math is OK, your reading comprehension is not.


On Jul 15 08:58 PM mwfall wrote:

> THE AUTHOR IS 100% WRONG. HIS ARTICLE IS WORTHLESS AND HE'S A MATH
> DUNCE.
>
> HERE'S HIS MISTAKE:
>
> take the triple levereged one.
> when it goes from 100 to 70 the percentage loss is calculated by
> dividing 30 into 100 equals 30% (he was right on that one)
> when it goes from 70 to 100 the percentage gain is calculated by
> dividing 30 into 70 equals 42.85% gain !!

Don't Let the Banks Break You: Hedge Yourself with These 15 Option Strategies

Whether you have very little downside protection depends, or course, on whether you're writing I-T-M or out-of-the-money calls. If you're called out of stocks you like, you can always buy them back and write additional calls.


On Jun 24 12:51 PM kjangelo wrote:

> selling covered calls is a good income strategy when the stocks stay
> the same or go down slightly , however it weeds out all your winning
> stocks and potentially leaves you with the losers. Also it leaves
> you with very little downside protection.

Don't Let the Banks Break You: Hedge Yourself with These 15 Option Strategies

Actually, Marco suggests I-T-M options on a regular basis where the probability of being called is certainly higher and his projected profitability numbers are consequently more likely.


On Jun 24 10:31 AM LanceLink wrote:

> Bernie --
>
> Here are the problems with this, and other articles that Marco writes:
>
>
> First, he bases his "return" on the possibility that the stock will
> be assigned. This is just based upon the hope that the stock will
> rise to the higher strike price. Basing your returns "if assigned"
> is a shaky strategy.
>
> Second, he keeps listing a column of numbers that he says is the
> "current probability" that the stock will reach that strike price.
> He does not explain the basis for that calculation in this article,
> nor has he ever explained it (I've checked his blog, it's not there
> either). Yes, Marco, I understand that there may be some extrapolation
> you can make from the option price and the volatility, etc. about
> the chances that a stock may reach a certain price, but it's all
> just hope.
>
> Writing calls is a solid strategy for income, but articles like this
> are not particularly useful.
>
> Write ATM for maximum return and protection.

Don't Let the Banks Break You: Hedge Yourself with These 15 Option Strategies

Selling covered calls is a viable way to gain downside protection on stocks you already own while enhancing your dividend yield.


On Jun 24 06:54 AM apppro wrote:

> Don't let these guys fool you either. Options may work, but not for
> 98% of us. Actually we're all suffering this added volitility just
> so a few option traders can make a couple of extra $.
> Stop the insanity! Even as Warren Buffett said the other day:
> "Make it simple!"