Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings [View article]
"I think the argument the author is laying out against solar is a fairly short-term one. He never claims solar won't be a great business down the road. But if oil continues to plummet, Solar's high valuations will not be sustainable.
Value is about what a business is trading for relative to what it's really worth - even the greatest business can be overpriced and the worst underpriced. And at current and future PEs, solar profits need to keep growing at an insanely fast rate to sustain current valuations."
I'm sure both you and the author are aware that the P/E ratios of FSLR and SPWR are the exception and not the rule when it comes to solars, and that in terms of P/E, other solars "stand out from the pack" even further than LDK.
Can we please stop treating the two presidential candidates as if they are equally likely to be beneficial to renewable energy such as solar? They're obviously not. McCain is about nuclear, and just picked a VP who is all about drilling.
What's Up with the China Solar Stocks [View article]
For god's sake, it's one @$#%!^@ day. Now it's the 'fear' of German subsidies being cut in 2010. I'm surprised there isn't a mention of the future government of Mars possibly cutting solar subsidies in 3112.
The Group GreenergyCapital, investment company specializes in making investments in the fields of renewable energy and energy conservation, has concluded with Trina Solar, international group active in the production of photovoltaic modules listed on the New York Stock Exchange, an important contract for the sale of panels to produce electricity. The agreement signed by Ergyca Power, a company wholly owned by GreenergyCapital, lasts three years (2008-2010) and provides that Trina Solar provides the Group GreenergyCapital photovoltaic modules with technology mono and poly-crystalline for a value of 158 million dollars. The agreement is part of the development programme of Group companies GreenergyCapital in the field of photovoltaics, the purchase of the panels in fact follows the establishment of four special purpose vehicle, created with the objective to identify and develop initiatives in the field of energy generation photovoltaics. In addition to investment operations, the Group has initiated activities realization of photovoltaic installations with the recent agreement with KME Group, which provides for the establishment of a plant on the establishment of Serravalle Scrivia, with an installed capacity of around 4.5 MWp plant, which will be installed photovoltaic modules produced by Trina Solar. "After the contract signed in April with Pramac, we continue successfully in the development project of GreenergyCapital in photovoltaics," says Luca d'Agnes, CEO of GreenergyCapital SpA "The agreement with Trina Solar, in fact, represents a second important element in the realization of our project, because it contributes substantially to the availability for the Group of a strategic component for the realization of photovoltaic systems."
Further Thoughts on Trina Solar and the Solar Space [View article]
Jack,
I was wondering if you could point to any links or sources regarding the FSLR comparison of installation costs vs. TSL (the two 150 watt panels vs one 300 watt panel thing).
"The energy ministers agreed on the need for more large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects that bury emissions from power plants, a cornerstone of the International Energy Agency's call for a $45 trillion energy "revolution".
"The time for talking is over. We have to implement this," British Business Minister John Hutton told Reuters in an interview, referring to the IEA goals.
The IEA report released on Friday, commissioned by G8 leaders three years ago, said the world would need to effectively "decarbonise" the power sector by building dozens of billion-dollar CCS plants over the next 40 years, although world governments remain at odds over who should foot the bill."
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
TSL's switch to the $ as "functional currency" was effective Jan 1, 2008, per their Q1 earnings release, so I'm guessing that's why it didn't impact Q4 2007?
Perhaps Trina is being paid by a greater % of it's European customers in dollars than, for example, YGE and CSIQ. I notice that CSIQ cited the "strong Euro vs USD" as a significant factor in their blowout quarter, though they also said "the large foreign exchange gain is likely a one-time event". I don't see where they state how much this was, but their statment of operations shows an $8 million figure under "Others - Net" under other income that I'm guessing is it.
What's weird to me is how YGE and CSIQ expressed their currency gains as a simple function of currency movements, but Trina's statement makes it sounds as if the loss is accounting mumbo jumbo:
[The $4.0 million exchange loss was] "... primarily associated with Trina China's non-US-denominated obligations that are now required to be remeasured in the US dollar functional currency. Such remeasurements are and will continue to be, to the extent we continue to have such non-US denominated obligations, recorded as transaction gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations".
"Foreign currency exchange gain was RMB 66.3 million (US$9.5 million) in the first quarter of 2008, compared to a foreign currency exchange loss of RMB 29.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 and a foreign currency exchange loss of RMB 0.1 million in the first quarter of 2007. The foreign currency exchange gain in the first quarter of 2008 was primarily due to the appreciation of the Euro against the Renminbi coupled with an increase in Euro-denominated sales, which was partially offset by the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi."
So this seems to indicate that a depreciating dollar against the RMB is also a negative for YGE.
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
VP,
Shouldn't the Yuan being pegged to the dollar be favorable? My thinking is that if sales are in Euros and costs in Yuan, then the weaker dollar would be good...but if so, why the $4 million loss?
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Jack,
Any idea why the change in "functional currency" to the $, given that most of their business is in Europe? I was under the impression that other foreign solars had been coming out ahead with regards to foreign currency in Q1, so the $4 million loss is an unexpected contrast. Since it is a Chinese company, I did not think being long TSL was inconsistent with a bearish view of the dollar, but now I'm wondering if it is.
Sort by:
Latest comments | Highest ratedNo Matter Who's Elected, Alternative Energy Wins [View article]
I guess only the United States is morally fit enough to own nuclear weapons?
Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings [View article]
Value is about what a business is trading for relative to what it's really worth - even the greatest business can be overpriced and the worst underpriced. And at current and future PEs, solar profits need to keep growing at an insanely fast rate to sustain current valuations."
I'm sure both you and the author are aware that the P/E ratios of FSLR and SPWR are the exception and not the rule when it comes to solars, and that in terms of P/E, other solars "stand out from the pack" even further than LDK.
Solar Breaks Oil Price Dependence [View article]
What's Up with the China Solar Stocks [View article]
Trina Solar: Will 2009 Be a Breakout Year? [View article]
"That is totally wrong, TSL will need additional money for it's 2009 expansion"
2008
2009
When Will Solar Achieve Grid Parity? We're Already There! [View article]
Further Thoughts on Trina Solar and the Solar Space [View article]
www.greenergycapital.c...
Which apparently translates to:
The Group GreenergyCapital, investment company specializes in making investments in the fields of renewable energy and energy conservation, has concluded with Trina Solar, international group active in the production of photovoltaic modules listed on the New York Stock Exchange, an important contract for the sale of panels to produce electricity.
The agreement signed by Ergyca Power, a company wholly owned by GreenergyCapital, lasts three years (2008-2010) and provides that Trina Solar provides the Group GreenergyCapital photovoltaic modules with technology mono and poly-crystalline for a value of 158 million dollars. The agreement is part of the development programme of Group companies GreenergyCapital in the field of photovoltaics, the purchase of the panels in fact follows the establishment of four special purpose vehicle, created with the objective to identify and develop initiatives in the field of energy generation photovoltaics.
In addition to investment operations, the Group has initiated activities realization of photovoltaic installations with the recent agreement with KME Group, which provides for the establishment of a plant on the establishment of Serravalle Scrivia, with an installed capacity of around 4.5 MWp plant, which will be installed photovoltaic modules produced by Trina Solar.
"After the contract signed in April with Pramac, we continue successfully in the development project of GreenergyCapital in photovoltaics," says Luca d'Agnes, CEO of GreenergyCapital SpA "The agreement with Trina Solar, in fact, represents a second important element in the realization of our project, because it contributes substantially to the availability for the Group of a strategic component for the realization of photovoltaic systems."
and
in.reuters.com/article...
Further Thoughts on Trina Solar and the Solar Space [View article]
I was wondering if you could point to any links or sources regarding the FSLR comparison of installation costs vs. TSL (the two 150 watt panels vs one 300 watt panel thing).
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
"The energy ministers agreed on the need for more large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects that bury emissions from power plants, a cornerstone of the International Energy Agency's call for a $45 trillion energy "revolution".
"The time for talking is over. We have to implement this," British Business Minister John Hutton told Reuters in an interview, referring to the IEA goals.
The IEA report released on Friday, commissioned by G8 leaders three years ago, said the world would need to effectively "decarbonise" the power sector by building dozens of billion-dollar CCS plants over the next 40 years, although world governments remain at odds over who should foot the bill."
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Perhaps Trina is being paid by a greater % of it's European customers in dollars than, for example, YGE and CSIQ. I notice that CSIQ cited the "strong Euro vs USD" as a significant factor in their blowout quarter, though they also said "the large foreign exchange gain is likely a one-time event". I don't see where they state how much this was, but their statment of operations shows an $8 million figure under "Others - Net" under other income that I'm guessing is it.
What's weird to me is how YGE and CSIQ expressed their currency gains as a simple function of currency movements, but Trina's statement makes it sounds as if the loss is accounting mumbo jumbo:
[The $4.0 million exchange loss was] "... primarily associated with Trina China's non-US-denominated obligations that are now required to be remeasured in the US dollar functional currency. Such remeasurements are and will continue to be, to the extent we continue to have such non-US denominated obligations, recorded as transaction gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations".
If you don't get it, I sure as hell don't.
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
www.nytimes.com/2008/0...
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Did some further reading and found out about YGE's currency gain of 9.5 million in Q1 2008, and $4 million loss in Q4 2007.
biz.yahoo.com/bw/08051...
"Foreign currency exchange gain was RMB 66.3 million (US$9.5 million) in the first quarter of 2008, compared to a foreign currency exchange loss of RMB 29.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 and a foreign currency exchange loss of RMB 0.1 million in the first quarter of 2007. The foreign currency exchange gain in the first quarter of 2008 was primarily due to the appreciation of the Euro against the Renminbi coupled with an increase in Euro-denominated sales, which was partially offset by the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi."
So this seems to indicate that a depreciating dollar against the RMB is also a negative for YGE.
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Thanks for your insight.
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Shouldn't the Yuan being pegged to the dollar be favorable? My thinking is that if sales are in Euros and costs in Yuan, then the weaker dollar would be good...but if so, why the $4 million loss?
Which Solar Stocks Will Continue To Shine? [View article]
Any idea why the change in "functional currency" to the $, given that most of their business is in Europe? I was under the impression that other foreign solars had been coming out ahead with regards to foreign currency in Q1, so the $4 million loss is an unexpected contrast. Since it is a Chinese company, I did not think being long TSL was inconsistent with a bearish view of the dollar, but now I'm wondering if it is.