<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>huthutho's Comments</title>
    <description>huthutho's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1981801/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>6 Reasons Why You Should Consider Royal Dutch Shell With A 5.5% Yield</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1452771/comments?source=feed#comment-19121841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19121841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nicely stated Rick! Long RDS.B in Roth IRA (no drip!)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:31:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nicely stated Rick! Long RDS.B in Roth IRA (no drip!)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adobe Jumps Off A Cliff, Leaves Parachute Behind</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1412811/comments?source=feed#comment-18780461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18780461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry, I should have been more specific! It may make sense to the company - not the customer base - to change to a subscription model, because the company foresees their revenue stream drying up due to having such a high market penetration or growing competition from open source products.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:28:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry, I should have been more specific! It may make sense to the company - not the customer base - to change to a subscription model, because the company foresees their revenue stream drying up due to having such a high market penetration or growing competition from open source products.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: Busting Another False Myth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427041/comments?source=feed#comment-18750771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18750771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While my quote mentions Intel&amp;Microsoft, it was meant to be generic, i.e. as the hardware gets more powerful, then software is written to take advantage of the hardware. Thus, there will be a market for more powerful hardware. I do agree that Microsoft's Win8 success will effect Intel's results. We won't know the magnitude of the effect, or its significance compared to other Intel units' sales, until after results are announced each quarter. I suspect most users will stick with Win7, an increasing number of corporate IT infrastructures will move to thin client such as Wyse (but those thin clients will have the heavy lifting done on backend servers), and a lot of companies will have setbacks moving to the cloud (Adobe comes to mind.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:02:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While my quote mentions Intel&amp;Microsoft, it was meant to be generic, i.e. as the hardware gets more powerful, then software is written to take advantage of the hardware. Thus, there will be a market for more powerful hardware. I do agree that Microsoft's Win8 success will effect Intel's results. We won't know the magnitude of the effect, or its significance compared to other Intel units' sales, until after results are announced each quarter. I suspect most users will stick with Win7, an increasing number of corporate IT infrastructures will move to thin client such as Wyse (but those thin clients will have the heavy lifting done on backend servers), and a lot of companies will have setbacks moving to the cloud (Adobe comes to mind.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: Busting Another False Myth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427041/comments?source=feed#comment-18741951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18741951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Someone said &quot;Intel giveth.. Microsoft taketh away..&quot; meaning more powerful processors will continue to be needed to run the ever-more sophisticated software. I've been in and out of Intel and will be going back in.. now. I'm also expecting top&amp;bottom line growth via the foundry biz.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 17:27:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Someone said &quot;Intel giveth.. Microsoft taketh away..&quot; meaning more powerful processors will continue to be needed to run the ever-more sophisticated software. I've been in and out of Intel and will be going back in.. now. I'm also expecting top&amp;bottom line growth via the foundry biz.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adobe Jumps Off A Cliff, Leaves Parachute Behind</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1412811/comments?source=feed#comment-18579361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18579361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree with your view that it is a bold/risky move. But do they have a choice? Moving to subscription (cloud or otherwise) could be a response to marketing ideas, customer demands, and/or market saturation of existing product (leaving only maintenance fees to support the company's future.) I think their products are fairly ubiquitous, so the move may make sense to avoid running off the revenue cliff... IMHO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:21:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree with your view that it is a bold/risky move. But do they have a choice? Moving to subscription (cloud or otherwise) could be a response to marketing ideas, customer demands, and/or market saturation of existing product (leaving only maintenance fees to support the company's future.) I think their products are fairly ubiquitous, so the move may make sense to avoid running off the revenue cliff... IMHO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linn Energy Faces Yet Another Bear Attack</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1412521/comments?source=feed#comment-18578601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18578601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If the issue was that the BRY acquisition would not close, then there'd be a possible reason to see a price drop at least until another merger/acquisition was tee'd up. But that is not the article's &quot;justification.&quot; FWIW, according to LinkedIn, Kevin Kaiser (Hedgeye energy analyst) graduated with a BA in Econ in 2010. Think I'll stay long LNCO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:06:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If the issue was that the BRY acquisition would not close, then there'd be a possible reason to see a price drop at least until another merger/acquisition was tee'd up. But that is not the article's &quot;justification.&quot; FWIW, according to LinkedIn, Kevin Kaiser (Hedgeye energy analyst) graduated with a BA in Econ in 2010. Think I'll stay long LNCO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Cheap, Safe Dividend Stocks Now On Sale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384231/comments?source=feed#comment-18275971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18275971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe NEM's dividend is a function of the price of gold, so div investors should understand this point before taking a position. <br/>From their website:<br/>&quot;The second quarter 2013 dividend of $0.35 per share was based on the average London P.M. Fix of $1,632 per ounce for the first quarter 2013.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:59:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe NEM's dividend is a function of the price of gold, so div investors should understand this point before taking a position. <br/>From their website:<br/>&quot;The second quarter 2013 dividend of $0.35 per share was based on the average London P.M. Fix of $1,632 per ounce for the first quarter 2013.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Almost May, So Go Away</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1373701/comments?source=feed#comment-18181181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18181181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Buy in May and make some hay,<br/>  But sell in June before the swoon.<br/>Invest in July before the high,<br/>  Then sell in August before you sigh.<br/>Remember September - trade then too!<br/>  (And again in October - for a Divvie or two.)<br/>November's a must, you surely can trust,<br/>  For a hike in a DIV and a rich life to live.<br/>Along 'bout December - you'll surely remember -<br/>  To forget what you heard way back in November.<br/>Which brings us back to January, ya' know,<br/>  The month that's a guide for where to put your dough.<br/>Now by February - if you're not frozen out -<br/>  Quietly buy calls and puts but don't shout.<br/>For by March those expiring options will show,<br/>  If you're poor or possibly made some more dough.<br/>And by April you're back to pondering once more,<br/>  Is it &quot;buy in May&quot; or &quot;head for the door?&quot;<br/><br/>(...with apologies to those who take this seriously.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 22:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Buy in May and make some hay,<br/>  But sell in June before the swoon.<br/>Invest in July before the high,<br/>  Then sell in August before you sigh.<br/>Remember September - trade then too!<br/>  (And again in October - for a Divvie or two.)<br/>November's a must, you surely can trust,<br/>  For a hike in a DIV and a rich life to live.<br/>Along 'bout December - you'll surely remember -<br/>  To forget what you heard way back in November.<br/>Which brings us back to January, ya' know,<br/>  The month that's a guide for where to put your dough.<br/>Now by February - if you're not frozen out -<br/>  Quietly buy calls and puts but don't shout.<br/>For by March those expiring options will show,<br/>  If you're poor or possibly made some more dough.<br/>And by April you're back to pondering once more,<br/>  Is it &quot;buy in May&quot; or &quot;head for the door?&quot;<br/><br/>(...with apologies to those who take this seriously.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Many Of My Dividend Growth Stocks Have Become Overvalued, What Do I Do Now?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1374951/comments?source=feed#comment-18129561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18129561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wonderful article, sir. One &quot;mistake&quot; I've made is to sell too soon after a relatively fast jump in price, thinking I could re-enter the position on a pullback sometime during the next month/qtr/year. I've done this despite my establishing a higher sell point at the time of purchase. So much for discipline at times! Example: bought MCY at 37 and sold at 41 after a month because it already jumped 10%, which is more than a year's div (6%). Akin to your WMT example but much shorter hold duration. While it is not a bad idea to take a profit on (especially) highly overpriced stocks, if the goal is to create a DG portfolio, then to &quot;capture the DIV&quot; by selling for a capital gain, one gives up the long-term possibilities of a &quot;set it &amp; monitor it&quot; approach that gives one more time to do other things. PS - MCY is up another couple points in a matter of days. Might just have to jump back in and see if it reaches my original sell price...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:23:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wonderful article, sir. One &quot;mistake&quot; I've made is to sell too soon after a relatively fast jump in price, thinking I could re-enter the position on a pullback sometime during the next month/qtr/year. I've done this despite my establishing a higher sell point at the time of purchase. So much for discipline at times! Example: bought MCY at 37 and sold at 41 after a month because it already jumped 10%, which is more than a year's div (6%). Akin to your WMT example but much shorter hold duration. While it is not a bad idea to take a profit on (especially) highly overpriced stocks, if the goal is to create a DG portfolio, then to &quot;capture the DIV&quot; by selling for a capital gain, one gives up the long-term possibilities of a &quot;set it &amp; monitor it&quot; approach that gives one more time to do other things. PS - MCY is up another couple points in a matter of days. Might just have to jump back in and see if it reaches my original sell price...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't Underestimate The Power Of A Good Oil Dividend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1367051/comments?source=feed#comment-18086761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18086761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've also watched RDS for a long time, and went long last month... RDS-B shares in a Roth IRA. Suggest look forward 5 years at their natural gas future and you may like it more than CVX.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:00:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've also watched RDS for a long time, and went long last month... RDS-B shares in a Roth IRA. Suggest look forward 5 years at their natural gas future and you may like it more than CVX.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why IBM Failed To Impress</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1355361/comments?source=feed#comment-17885851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17885851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Having studied IBM, and bought and sold IBM over many years, I share your view, and would add that the 8% drop is indicative of a much larger concern by the major (institutional &amp; fund) investors. (Disclosure: I do not hold IBM at this time.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:20:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Having studied IBM, and bought and sold IBM over many years, I share your view, and would add that the 8% drop is indicative of a much larger concern by the major (institutional &amp; fund) investors. (Disclosure: I do not hold IBM at this time.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't Believe The Stories That The Markets Are Down Today</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1343811/comments?source=feed#comment-17689101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17689101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're a real curmudgeon for all those doom&amp;gloomers, RB! ;-)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:38:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're a real curmudgeon for all those doom&amp;gloomers, RB! ;-)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linn Energy - A Stock To Buy With REIT Dividends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1327261/comments?source=feed#comment-17377531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17377531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Norman, I think you answered P&amp;G's question correctly in your first paragraph, but may have confused him (&amp; me!) in the second.<br/>Because no K-1 is issued, even if the div is funded by a RoC, and your shares are in a Roth, then upon sale of the shares in the Roth - even tho' the basis may be reduced - there should be no tax. (I think that is what Doctor D asks in his following comment, too.) <br/>Thanks Norman for all of your articles and comments... they are very helpful! Long LNCO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:00:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Norman, I think you answered P&amp;G's question correctly in your first paragraph, but may have confused him (&amp; me!) in the second.<br/>Because no K-1 is issued, even if the div is funded by a RoC, and your shares are in a Roth, then upon sale of the shares in the Roth - even tho' the basis may be reduced - there should be no tax. (I think that is what Doctor D asks in his following comment, too.) <br/>Thanks Norman for all of your articles and comments... they are very helpful! Long LNCO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linn Energy - A Stock To Buy With REIT Dividends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1327261/comments?source=feed#comment-17361991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17361991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@af, I also looked at this &quot;issue&quot; before going long LNCO. The company addressed it to my satisfaction. Suggest look up articles on SA for details.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:05:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@af, I also looked at this &quot;issue&quot; before going long LNCO. The company addressed it to my satisfaction. Suggest look up articles on SA for details.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Will Hit A Share Price Of $36 By 2016</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1310941/comments?source=feed#comment-17060651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17060651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm long INTC in my DG folio. But, I share some of the thoughts here... is &quot;INTC to $36&quot; the same as &quot;AAPL to $1000?&quot; Is the competition going to limit their growth? Will they create new markets? I'm willing to hold and collect the 4+% dividend while I wait to see how it plays out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:04:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm long INTC in my DG folio. But, I share some of the thoughts here... is &quot;INTC to $36&quot; the same as &quot;AAPL to $1000?&quot; Is the competition going to limit their growth? Will they create new markets? I'm willing to hold and collect the 4+% dividend while I wait to see how it plays out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel-Cisco Foundry Deal Confirmed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1308611/comments?source=feed#comment-16977941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16977941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Being a customer does not mean being a big customer. A $B worth of fuse controllers is probably enough for the intergalactic internet (with apologies to Vint Cerf!) Long INTC.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:25:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Being a customer does not mean being a big customer. A $B worth of fuse controllers is probably enough for the intergalactic internet (with apologies to Vint Cerf!) Long INTC.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MLPs - A Reality Check ?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1300561/comments?source=feed#comment-16831681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16831681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If MLPs lose favor, then won't the non-MLPs also go down? (IMO, the MLPs will still be in favor due to their high returns for those willing to deal with the tax issues. I prefer the likes of LNCO, EEQ, KMR in my Roth IRA.) Long LNCO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:51:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If MLPs lose favor, then won't the non-MLPs also go down? (IMO, the MLPs will still be in favor due to their high returns for those willing to deal with the tax issues. I prefer the likes of LNCO, EEQ, KMR in my Roth IRA.) Long LNCO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Bought Linn Energy In My Roth IRA</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298251/comments?source=feed#comment-16807951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16807951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Having purchased my 1st MLP in '72 (disposed of it in '92), I suggest readers listen to Reel Ken regarding tax implications. (FWIW, I took an initial position in LNCO today in a Roth IRA.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:15:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Having purchased my 1st MLP in '72 (disposed of it in '92), I suggest readers listen to Reel Ken regarding tax implications. (FWIW, I took an initial position in LNCO today in a Roth IRA.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Bought Linn Energy In My Roth IRA</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298251/comments?source=feed#comment-16775161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16775161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Appreciate your tactful &amp; informed comments (&amp; articles), Reel Ken... I've been waiting until lock-up period on LNCO has passed before taking a position... Apr 10th as I recall. In your view, does that make sense or won't the lock-up expiration be a factor for LNCO? TIA.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:44:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Appreciate your tactful &amp; informed comments (&amp; articles), Reel Ken... I've been waiting until lock-up period on LNCO has passed before taking a position... Apr 10th as I recall. In your view, does that make sense or won't the lock-up expiration be a factor for LNCO? TIA.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Uncomfortable Bull</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1297461/comments?source=feed#comment-16764731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16764731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good article, Cam. So, is the inner turmoil merely creating a wall of worry, or is it &quot;correct?&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:36:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good article, Cam. So, is the inner turmoil merely creating a wall of worry, or is it &quot;correct?&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Facebook Could Grow To Eclipse The Stock Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1295551/comments?source=feed#comment-16698851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16698851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[IMO... FB has the potential to be successful, but more for ad rev. (By allowing users to control who sees what, I do not see the intrusiveness issues that other comments refer to.) Keep an eye on earnings.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:16:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[IMO... FB has the potential to be successful, but more for ad rev. (By allowing users to control who sees what, I do not see the intrusiveness issues that other comments refer to.) Keep an eye on earnings.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Keep It Simple Stupid - Buy This Misunderstood Tech Name For 35% Upside</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1287481/comments?source=feed#comment-16618901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16618901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Will check it out. Linux is &quot;free&quot; (open source) too, yet RedHat seems to be doing well with packaging it up! (If you think anything is free, I have a free puppy to give you!)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:55:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Will check it out. Linux is &quot;free&quot; (open source) too, yet RedHat seems to be doing well with packaging it up! (If you think anything is free, I have a free puppy to give you!)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smackdown: Dividends vs Annuities, The Main Event</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281151/comments?source=feed#comment-16543661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16543661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@AgAuMoney, Thanks! I appreciate your thoughtful reply as it articulates my questions more definitively and will help guide my research into my M-in-L's policy. In particular, your last paragraph is germane as that is what my M-in-L is now asking about. So, I'll be reviewing my M-in-L's policy soon with an eye to the details. While I suspect the minimum payout is spelled out in the document, I wonder if the language merely states the balance upon death is &quot;TBD based on investment experience.&quot; <br/><br/>For my M-in-L's case, author RS's 3rd paragraph is why my F-in-L bought it for her. That, and the fact that he knew she would have no interest in managing her finances.<br/><br/>As for me, I don't think I'll be getting an annuity, but then again I no longer have life insurance either... rather manage my own affairs.<br/><br/>Lastly, this article and comments now have me thinking about how each of my beneficiaries will manage inherited assets, and how I can best prepare them (both the assets and the kids) to do so. For example, I may now invest in some MLPs that I will not ever touch, and leave them to the kids, as they generally have a higher return than other investments. Thus, I'll not pay taxes on them (unless Uncle Sam changes the rules) as that would help achieve my goal of leaving something to them.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:27:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@AgAuMoney, Thanks! I appreciate your thoughtful reply as it articulates my questions more definitively and will help guide my research into my M-in-L's policy. In particular, your last paragraph is germane as that is what my M-in-L is now asking about. So, I'll be reviewing my M-in-L's policy soon with an eye to the details. While I suspect the minimum payout is spelled out in the document, I wonder if the language merely states the balance upon death is &quot;TBD based on investment experience.&quot; <br/><br/>For my M-in-L's case, author RS's 3rd paragraph is why my F-in-L bought it for her. That, and the fact that he knew she would have no interest in managing her finances.<br/><br/>As for me, I don't think I'll be getting an annuity, but then again I no longer have life insurance either... rather manage my own affairs.<br/><br/>Lastly, this article and comments now have me thinking about how each of my beneficiaries will manage inherited assets, and how I can best prepare them (both the assets and the kids) to do so. For example, I may now invest in some MLPs that I will not ever touch, and leave them to the kids, as they generally have a higher return than other investments. Thus, I'll not pay taxes on them (unless Uncle Sam changes the rules) as that would help achieve my goal of leaving something to them.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smackdown: Dividends vs Annuities, The Main Event</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281151/comments?source=feed#comment-16526751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16526751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My mother-in-law has an annuity purchased by my long-deceased father-in-law. It grew in &quot;value&quot; for some years before being drawn on. It has fluctuated in &quot;value&quot; during the drawdown years, but still has a lot of &quot;value.&quot; What is not clear is whether that &quot;value&quot; is a false one, i.e., is it used as a basis for determining monthly payouts (due to its &quot;insurance&quot; nature), while the true &quot;investment account&quot; has little or no real value to beneficiaries upon death of my mother-in-law? It is clearly not a fixed annuity with immediate payout as used in RS' example.<br/><br/>I also spoke with an annuity salesman recently who said there is, in my words,  a sort of double-entry bookkeeping. Thus, the basis for payouts is on a hypothetical 8% growth of the funds placed in the annuity. But, the actual amount of funds at death is based on another accounting method, and is &quot;less.&quot; When I asked to see a sample contract, he said I couldn't have one until after I signed up (!!!) and the company would then provide it. And he is from a reputable outfit.<br/><br/>I still have some homework to do! Seems if they are willing to pay 8% per year, and, for example, I only drew out 8% at the end of each year, then the original amount should still be available to beneficiaries regardless of when I no longer need it. (Thus, they would have to be earning more than 8% per year, year in and year out, in order to pay commissions and keep the lights on.) What am I missing?!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:50:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My mother-in-law has an annuity purchased by my long-deceased father-in-law. It grew in &quot;value&quot; for some years before being drawn on. It has fluctuated in &quot;value&quot; during the drawdown years, but still has a lot of &quot;value.&quot; What is not clear is whether that &quot;value&quot; is a false one, i.e., is it used as a basis for determining monthly payouts (due to its &quot;insurance&quot; nature), while the true &quot;investment account&quot; has little or no real value to beneficiaries upon death of my mother-in-law? It is clearly not a fixed annuity with immediate payout as used in RS' example.<br/><br/>I also spoke with an annuity salesman recently who said there is, in my words,  a sort of double-entry bookkeeping. Thus, the basis for payouts is on a hypothetical 8% growth of the funds placed in the annuity. But, the actual amount of funds at death is based on another accounting method, and is &quot;less.&quot; When I asked to see a sample contract, he said I couldn't have one until after I signed up (!!!) and the company would then provide it. And he is from a reputable outfit.<br/><br/>I still have some homework to do! Seems if they are willing to pay 8% per year, and, for example, I only drew out 8% at the end of each year, then the original amount should still be available to beneficiaries regardless of when I no longer need it. (Thus, they would have to be earning more than 8% per year, year in and year out, in order to pay commissions and keep the lights on.) What am I missing?!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook's Revival: The Ship Has Sailed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1269461/comments?source=feed#comment-16283951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16283951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;...the ad revenue consisted of 94.6% of the total revenue of the firm in 2011 and 84% in 2012. Though the percentage is shocking, it is displaying a growth rate of 69% from the 2010-2011 periods and 40% from 2011-2012.&quot;<br/><br/>Why is it shocking?<br/><br/>IMO, they have the eyeballs and are successfully competing with GOOG for ad revenue.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:15:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;...the ad revenue consisted of 94.6% of the total revenue of the firm in 2011 and 84% in 2012. Though the percentage is shocking, it is displaying a growth rate of 69% from the 2010-2011 periods and 40% from 2011-2012.&quot;<br/><br/>Why is it shocking?<br/><br/>IMO, they have the eyeballs and are successfully competing with GOOG for ad revenue.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investors Ignore What's Happening In Retail At Their Peril</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1221801/comments?source=feed#comment-15528551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15528551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bret, thanks for writing. If you like energy MLPs, what do you think of EMLP, an ETF?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bret, thanks for writing. If you like energy MLPs, what do you think of EMLP, an ETF?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billionaire Leon Cooperman Is Bullish About These 5 Dividend-Paying Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1220521/comments?source=feed#comment-15522881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15522881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LNCO lockup ends APR 10th.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LNCO lockup ends APR 10th.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linn Energy Made History By Buying Berry Petroleum</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1219441/comments?source=feed#comment-15456931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15456931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I plan to buy LNCO in my IRA when the large short position goes down and when the lockup period expires (APR 10th)... might be around the same time. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:23:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I plan to buy LNCO in my IRA when the large short position goes down and when the lockup period expires (APR 10th)... might be around the same time. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Team Alpha Portfolio: Selling A Stock When Serious Questions Arise</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1189951/comments?source=feed#comment-15319521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15319521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Besides waiting on the large short position to go away, I may wait on the end of the lock-up period on 10th of April before buying. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:50:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Besides waiting on the large short position to go away, I may wait on the end of the lock-up period on 10th of April before buying. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Team Alpha Portfolio: Selling A Stock When Serious Questions Arise</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1189951/comments?source=feed#comment-15319181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15319181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Since BRY shareholders and management are taking LINE stock for their company,...&quot;<br/><br/>Small point, but LNCO shares are being used to buy BRY, then LNCO is transferring BRY assets to LINE in exchange for additional ownership units. Thus, it is LNCO stock and not LINE stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:44:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Since BRY shareholders and management are taking LINE stock for their company,...&quot;<br/><br/>Small point, but LNCO shares are being used to buy BRY, then LNCO is transferring BRY assets to LINE in exchange for additional ownership units. Thus, it is LNCO stock and not LINE stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
