Seeking Alpha

petersterling » Comments » APA

  • Implementing Pickens' Plan for Public Energy Policy [View article]
    I just sold my Excursion for mere sheckels. I would have preferred to convert it to CNG but there's no CNG stations to refuel it!

    My Company Arctic Oil & Gas, (AOAG) recently offered Santa Barbara County residents $2.50 gasoline and $1.50 CNG and hundreds of millions in royalties, if they let us develop proven oil reserves of 250 - 500 million barrels in the SB channel and land 1 trillion cubic ft a year of gas from my Bering sea gas project. And we offered to convert cars to CNG.

    So far no one seems much interested. Americans would rather send their entire national wealth to our enemies!!!

    See; www.strategicnine.com/...

    Other companies hold leases suspended for 30 years with 2-3 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. This is just over a small stretch of California coast.

    OPEC-Russia will own every major American company within 6 years at current oil prices. Your kids will have to work for them!!!!

    Aug 18 08:58 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Implementing Pickens' Plan for Public Energy Policy [View article]
    we are being mislead by world-wide activist organizations and governments that global warming results from human activity.

    That is false. "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules Climate Change". A report by this title that can be downloaded from sepp.org

    The popular notion, that seemingly has become a religion with many people, is that human activity is behind global warming. This idea is being pushed by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC. Its members are paid by their governments to participate in this activity.

    Most of us citizens who have read about the IPCC and its reports would think that its objective was to determine if human activity was causing global warming. But that is not the case. The IPCC was established in the early 90s by the UN as an activist enterprise from its very beginning. Its agenda is to justify control of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide. Consequently, its scientific reports have focused solely on evidence that might point toward human-induced climate change to the exclusion of evidence to the contrary. And the IPCC has not only ignored evidence to the contrary, but worse yet, its leadership has doctored reports to support the leadership's view that human activity is causing global warming.

    A group of 31 internationally known, unpaid, volunteer climate scientists met in early 2007 to produce a truly scientific and balanced report that examined what was known about the science of global warming and cooling. This group called themselves the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change - the NIPCC. Their report has now been completed and can be found at this web site: sepp.org under Publications.

    [If you are concerned that I may be overstating the case against the IPCC's reports, see paragraph 3 on page iii of the Preface to the NIPCC report (the reference to which is found below) that is written by Dr. Fred Seitz, the recently deceased President Emeritus of Rockefeller University, the Past President of the National Academy of Sciences, and the Past President of the American Physical Society.]

    When you read my summary, you may want to read Singer's and Avery's book available from Amazon and other bookstores. The main focus of that book is to present the historical evidence that the earth's climate is being affected by a 1500 year cycle of global warming and then cooling caused by periodic variations in the sun's output. The most recent temperature minimum for the earth was in 1850, and is referred to as the Little Ice Age. We are on an upswing in temperature now known by climate scientists as the Moderate Warming Period.

    The NIPCC report has as its objective the presentation of a balanced view of the data on cooling and warming and its sources. What they found is the opposite of what the IPCC and the media are promoting. To quote from the Conclusion of the NIPCC report:

    "It is regrettable that the public debate over climate change, fueled by the errors and exaggerations contained in the reports of the IPCC, has strayed so far from scientific truth. It is an embarrassment to science that hype has replaced reason in the global debate over so important an issue."

    Jul 21 07:50 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Implementing Pickens' Plan for Public Energy Policy [View article]
    I have two natural gas deposits which could supply all the NG needed for 1/4 of the US vehicle fleet. Its all here and ready to go. see strategicnine.com . any Questions?
    Jul 17 09:21 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on APA by petersterling
Comments by Ticker
petersterling's
Comments Stats
40 comments
Rating: 9 (17 - 8 )