Deepfryer999

Obama's Green Obsession: More Harm Than Good?

As for your "facts", they are laughable at best. You said, "There is a fundamental physical law at work here. It states that the maximum amount of energy that the earth receives from the sun under optimum conditions is just under 1 kWh per square meter (11 square feet). So even if these panels were 100 per cent technically efficient they would still be grossly inefficient economically."

Where is your math, regarding the overall costs of solar panels? You made a ridiculous leap in your logic, without backing it up. This is like saying "six times nine equals fifty four, therefore Obama is going to be a bad president". You made no connection between the theoretical, physical efficiency of a solar panel, and your conclusion that it cannot work financially.

Regarding the British study you cited, who cares? I could find you a "study" from 1000 years ago that says the Earth is flat. Britian is going all-in on wind energy, so obviously they have changed their mind based on new information and new technology that has been developed.

But I guess I shouldn't have expected any rational, logic-based arguments from someone who apparently still supports Bush.