> Cramer has made huge contributions to investor awareness through > his show and his books. He surely has faults, but he has helped many > investors. As the author said Cramer was way ahead of almost everybody > else in calling our economic mess and what would happen if the Fed > and government did not heed his advice. Cramer has consistantly offered > measures for regulators to take to improve the investing world for > the average person, and he has put to shame many executives who have > underperformed. > > As to John Stewart, I have no idea where he gets off taking on Cramer-and > for that matter, it was silly of Cramer to participate in Stewart's > sideshow. Stewart has been "The Entertainment Guy" for years and > has done an admirable job-if you are into the shallow celebrities > of today. Am curious as to what Stewart's credentials are on financial > matters and why he would be involved in such things. > > It is fine to pan Cramer, but in doing so, you must tell the story > of the good things Cramer has done for investors. It seams most reports > I see on Cramer are unbalanced against him. Media people have an > obligation to report all sides of a person's doings-comments and > opinions are done separately. I ought to know-I spent over 30 years > working on newspapers.
-
30 years and you still need a proof-reader...hehe
Mar 15 14:30 pm
|Rating:
0
-3
All Comments by whenmusicstops »Stewart vs. Cramer: A Cheap Shot [View article]
On Mar 15 09:22 AM peapack@verizon.net wrote:
> Cramer has made huge contributions to investor awareness through
> his show and his books. He surely has faults, but he has helped many
> investors. As the author said Cramer was way ahead of almost everybody
> else in calling our economic mess and what would happen if the Fed
> and government did not heed his advice. Cramer has consistantly offered
> measures for regulators to take to improve the investing world for
> the average person, and he has put to shame many executives who have
> underperformed.
>
> As to John Stewart, I have no idea where he gets off taking on Cramer-and
> for that matter, it was silly of Cramer to participate in Stewart's
> sideshow. Stewart has been "The Entertainment Guy" for years and
> has done an admirable job-if you are into the shallow celebrities
> of today. Am curious as to what Stewart's credentials are on financial
> matters and why he would be involved in such things.
>
> It is fine to pan Cramer, but in doing so, you must tell the story
> of the good things Cramer has done for investors. It seams most reports
> I see on Cramer are unbalanced against him. Media people have an
> obligation to report all sides of a person's doings-comments and
> opinions are done separately. I ought to know-I spent over 30 years
> working on newspapers.