The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
You are currently following N. Courtney
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following N. Courtney
-
0
)
View N. Courtney's Comments on:
iPhone 3G Fallout: Good for Towers, Bad for Palm [View article]
The fact that Apple offers one phone in their portfolio, and was still selling an expensive feature rich phone only to come with one at a subsized price point reiturates the point of just how easily some people can be manipulated into buying anything. The iPod was suppose to be the standard that raised the bar for playing music and video, but people who bought the device soon found that you couldn't take music and video and transfer it to any other device of your choice, Apple controls all aspects of that device, I have a device that can do the same things except I can transfer my music and video where ever I choose, gee am I seeing a trend here, I can buy an iPhone only if I switch to the carrier Apple chose exclusively in the U.S..
One day I hope people wake up and realize that the subsidized phones are a bad deal, Oh but wait they have recent legislation that's being discussed by law makers to do something about high disconnect fee is in the process, but what the people who want this legislation don't realize is that the reason they're getting a sweet deal on the phone is that it's SUBSIDIZED by the U.S. carriers the carriers buy the phones for a much higher price than they sale them, hence to get their money back the customer is put into a 1, 2 or even three year contract agreements. Apple was selling a phone with a bunch of bells and whistles for an exorbitant price and people were still having to sign contract agreements, just as they are with the new iPhone that just came out a 2 year contract, that will probably be just about the that phone will start having problems, and when they come out with a new iPhone that people will upgrade to and be locked into another 2 year contract. I don't hear people singing the praises of the iPod like they once did when they first came out, and the same will happen with the iPhone. Me I just need a phone to make phone calls reliably. If i want sexy I'll find a woman, not a hand held device.
User 210048 is right facts are not deniable, if they make it, and sale it, their is a sucker or a lemming who will buy it. Pretty much the same way some people believe campaign promises. I get a trade magazine that cover the wireless industry and one of the writers said the same thing as User 210048, how Apple raised the bar, I just want to know what Apple is telling the customers who had bought the first and more expensive iPhone, only to come out with what User 210048 says techniacl issues which have been addresses, and come out with a supposedly superior flawless new phone for a much lower price. SUCKERS!
iPhone 3G Fallout: Good for Towers, Bad for Palm [View article]
You can put all the bells and whistles on the iPhone or any other phone, and it's not going to make people switch AT&T subsidizing Apple was a bad idea, especially for consumers when most manufacturers are trying to get their product out to as many people as possible, Apple goes with this same business model as they did with the iPod exclusivity. Verizon is the number one wireless carrier for a reason, and they don't sale iPhones, but they did have smart business since to buy Alltel. AT&T got an exclusive deal to sale iPhones. Which one of the carriers will sign an retain more customers in the long run, and customer defections usually aren't good for the business or it's investors.