Takeda Forced to Surrender DPP-IV Drug Market to Merck [View article]
>>>>even if you're selective for that one enzyme, it has a lot of other substrates. So the story may well swing back to the biochemical mechanism again before we're through.<<<&l...
Methinks we may have gotten a little too smart for our own good! The plethora of data available nowadays--mechanisms, substrate specificity, lack of specificity, multiple substrates, inconclusive mechanism of action, P450 interactions, metabolic insufficiency, CV risk in overweight patients, etc., etc.
It no longer matters that a particular drug candidate may actually produce a positive outcome for a particular condition--God forbid that grossly overweight, chain smoking, and generally unhealthy Ma Kettle should get a bunion while on her pharmaceutical regimen for diabetes! End of drug!
What do you think the chances would be of the FDA approving acetylsalicylic acid?
>>>"We aren't producing enough good new drugs quickly enough."<<<&l...
You're right on--and it's not going to change, regardless of mergers, synergies, outsourcing nor high throughputs--
Americans (public, FDA, lawyers, class actions, judiciary, etc.) will no longer accept any pharmaceutical agent unless it is 100% effective, and 100% free of any and all side effects that can be imagined. The cost (and difficulty/improbabili... of producing such an agent is high enough that such agents will never be developed or sold.
The era of blockbuster medicines being developed is over--because Ma Kettle might develop a bunion, 300,000 people will hop on the class action, and an independent researcher from an obscure university/country will publish results confirming the bunion risk----and that will be that for the "miracle cure", and the pharma company touting said cure will be on the hook for millions/billions.
To ScientistSailor: Where's the "top talent" going to go? China? Goodbye DNA!!
If anyone thinks "it doesn't come any better", I don't know what planet they may be on. Mergers such as this don't have a very good track record. I'm sure this one will work, however, since the "researchers and labs will be kept intact". (sarcasm)
Merck / Schering-Plough Deal Makes Sense Up to a Point [View article]
Derek: Very general compliment-I really appreciate all the links and references you include in your articles-they really help the reader flesh out the full story.
Pfizer's Restructuring Still Leaves Employees in the Dark [View article]
Sounds almost identical to the "DPU" model being implemented at Glaxo. Hope for the research folk at Pfizer that the cuts are not as deep as at Glaxo (60-70%). I was one of the lucky ones-older, and well "packaged" for retirement!
Wyeth vs. Conte: Are Big Pharmas Now Liable for Generics? [View article]
Interesting. The original manufacturer (Wyeth) is not able to protect themselves or the public by removing the offending product from the market, since they no longer own the rights to the product. They only own the liability. Ain't America great? Ain't California the greatest?
GlaxoSmithKline Slashes Research Staff [View article]
Cardiovascular Chemistry at Upper Merion axing 2/3 staff (51 out of 76) in bloodbath Tuesday/Wednesday. Similar size cuts in CVU Chem at RTP. Biology/Pharmacology hit even harder. New strategy in research--lottsa luck!!
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedTakeda Forced to Surrender DPP-IV Drug Market to Merck [View article]
Methinks we may have gotten a little too smart for our own good! The plethora of data available nowadays--mechanisms, substrate specificity, lack of specificity, multiple substrates, inconclusive mechanism of action, P450 interactions, metabolic insufficiency, CV risk in overweight patients, etc., etc.
It no longer matters that a particular drug candidate may actually produce a positive outcome for a particular condition--God forbid that grossly overweight, chain smoking, and generally unhealthy Ma Kettle should get a bunion while on her pharmaceutical regimen for diabetes! End of drug!
What do you think the chances would be of the FDA approving acetylsalicylic acid?
Roche / Genentech Is a Done Deal [View article]
>>>"We aren't producing enough good new drugs quickly enough."<<<&l...
You're right on--and it's not going to change, regardless of mergers, synergies, outsourcing nor high throughputs--
Americans (public, FDA, lawyers, class actions, judiciary, etc.) will no longer accept any pharmaceutical agent unless it is 100% effective, and 100% free of any and all side effects that can be imagined. The cost (and difficulty/improbabili... of producing such an agent is high enough that such agents will never be developed or sold.
The era of blockbuster medicines being developed is over--because Ma Kettle might develop a bunion, 300,000 people will hop on the class action, and an independent researcher from an obscure university/country will publish results confirming the bunion risk----and that will be that for the "miracle cure", and the pharma company touting said cure will be on the hook for millions/billions.
Would you invest in a climate like that? Not me.
ex-chem
Roche / Genentech Is a Done Deal [View article]
If anyone thinks "it doesn't come any better", I don't know what planet they may be on. Mergers such as this don't have a very good track record. I'm sure this one will work, however, since the "researchers and labs will be kept intact". (sarcasm)
ex-chem (and happy)
Merck / Schering-Plough Deal Makes Sense Up to a Point [View article]
GlaxoSmithKline: More Cuts and No Guidance [View article]
GSK's distraction when they merged with each other is the reason for their present state of affairs---dismal!
As for their discontinuing external guidance--they haven't had any internal guidance in R&D for years!
Pfizer's Restructuring Still Leaves Employees in the Dark [View article]
Wyeth vs. Conte: Are Big Pharmas Now Liable for Generics? [View article]
GlaxoSmithKline Trims Down Oncology Head Count [View article]
GlaxoSmithKline Slashes Research Staff [View article]