Seeking Alpha

Xorthfred » Comments » XLF

  • Fed Creates Bank Margin Squeeze [View article]
    Disagree. The lower fed funds rate lowers the cost of capital for banks, which are not lending any money at Prime anyway. Credit default swaps for lending to Berkshire Hathaway reached 600 over treasuries, so don't tell me that banks are lending money to borrowers at the Prime rate-maybe LIBOR +Prime+two but not Prime.
    Dec 17 16:15 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Our Clueless Congress Strikes Again [View article]
    Thanks for your excellent article. I agree that Paulson made the right call to stabilize the banking system with the TARP money. I also think that commercial mortgages are now sitting in the bargain bin (for those properties not in California, NY, Florida, Arizona, Nevada and Michigan). The commercial mortgage delinquency rate remains (for now) below historical averages, yet the mortgages are BEING COMPLETELY WRITTEN OFF DUE TO MARK TO MARKET ACCOUNTING!

    Read it again in disbelief but it is true if you understand bank accounting. The OCC auditors like to see Reserves (write offs) as a percentage of non-performing mortgages rise during downturns in commercial real estate. mark to market accounting forces banks to reclassify performing (paying on time) mortgages to non-performing. If a bank has reserves (write offs) only 20% of nonperformings and nonperformings are rising, then the auditors want to see that percentage rise.

    Example: Bank has one billion $$ of nonperformings. They have reserves of $200 million. Under mark to market accounting, some $6 billion of commercial mortgages that are current with good debt service coverage now are selling for 80 cents on the dollar based on the cds and cmos (cdo) markets. The accountants force them to take a write off to market value of $1.2 billion. Now these loans are "non-performing". "Non-performings" (even though they are current and paying) now balloon to $7 billion. Reserves now are $1.4 billion. The accountants would like to see Reserves as a percentage of non-performings at 120%. Result: another write off of $7 billion.

    This scenario played out at Citicorp in the 1989-1993 time period.
    Dec 17 13:46 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Why This Bailout Can't Work - And What Will  [View article]
    ONE REFORM WOULD REVERSE THE DEATH SPIRAL: go back to the pre-Sarbanes Oxley accounting rules. If a mortgage is performing, you shouldn't have to write it off. Period. No one should invest in any bank or insurance company until the quarterly mark to market death spiral ends with mortgages selling based on a 75%+ annual return to the buyers or mark to market accounting of performing mortgages comes to an end. It is just a matter of how heavy the hand of govt. intrusion into the markets will push this economy down!!!!!!!!1
    Sep 29 12:34 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on XLF by Xorthfred
Comments by Ticker
Xorthfred's
Comments Stats
13 comments
Rating: 3 (4 - 1 is )