But the puts are $4 in the money, of course they are more expensive than the calls, which are out of the money. Price doesn't tell you anything.
On Jan 04 01:41 PM QVM Group wrote:
> Isnt_It_Just_Money > > Your addition of volatility information is helpful, and I encourage > investors to look at multiple dimensions of options, but I reject > the notion that volatility is the "correct" data to interpret (and > by implication that price is the "incorrect" data to interpret). > There is nothing incorrect about comparing the price of two related > securities (in this case two essentially inverse options). For our > purposes, in this instance, price is the preferred indicator of > what we are seeking to understand.
-
But the puts are $4 in the money, of course they are more expensive than the calls, which are out of the money. Price doesn't tell you anything.
Jan 04 13:55 pm
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by Isnt_It_Just_Money »Is the Long Bond Cracking? [View article]
On Jan 04 01:41 PM QVM Group wrote:
> Isnt_It_Just_Money
>
> Your addition of volatility information is helpful, and I encourage
> investors to look at multiple dimensions of options, but I reject
> the notion that volatility is the "correct" data to interpret (and
> by implication that price is the "incorrect" data to interpret).
> There is nothing incorrect about comparing the price of two related
> securities (in this case two essentially inverse options). For our
> purposes, in this instance, price is the preferred indicator of
> what we are seeking to understand.