alajac

Coming Soon: Banking Crisis of Historic Proportions

The "majority" didn't want to have private currency outlawed by a constitution that was written by a bunch of bankers and their buddies (See "Creating the U.S. Dollar Currency Union, 1748-1811: A Quest for Monetary Stability or a Usurpation of State Sovereignty for Personal Gain?" - start on page 15 with "RHETORIC VERSUS REALITY AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION" - at
eh.net/XIIICongress/cd...), but they got it anyway.

The Constitution has no authority and never did (see "The Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner at www.fourmilab.ch/etext...); what DOES have authority is "government guns" and a government's willingness to use those guns.

What's happening to day has happened over and over in U.S. and world history: the bankers let out credit until the system breaks, and then they roll in the collateral for the start of the next cycle.

It doesn't have to be like this, but there are certain lies (equivalent to the one about Santa) that underpin the system and keep putting the fruits of everyone's else's labor into the pockets of the bankers; the biggest one is that there is ever an ACTUAL owner of property other than the government, thus there is never any need for a government to borrow money (except to buy things owned by another government).

Government: A "government" is one or more persons who claim natural resources, are willing and able to defend their claim on those resources, and make and enforce decisions regarding the allocation of those resources; in other words, he, she, or they "govern" THEIR OWN property. Once claimed, natural resources are thereafter recognized as "property"; therefore all property comes into existence solely and only after being claimed by a government.

Governments are the DE FACTO (actual) owners of ALL the property within their dominion (i.e., the extent of the claims on natural resources/property that they are able and willing to defend); they set up "DE JURE" (legal) ownership however they like in an attempt to ensure and enhance their own survival and maximize profits for whoever controls the government (in our case, that is obviously a group that we can unpejoratively call "bankers", as it has been since the American counter-revolution of 1789).

The most notable thing that governments do is to "privatize" property, impairing everyone's right to free access to all land, a right required in order to give reality to any "right to life" there can ever be (see Tom Paine's "Agraian Justice" plan at www.thomaspaine.org/Ar...)

We just need to:
1. take control of the U.S. Federal government from the Republican and Democrat banking parties,

2. replace Fed debt-dollars with U.S. dollars backed by the $340 trillion of U.S. wealth (rather than debt)

3. Compensate everyone on a monthly basis for the government's impairment of their right to free access to all land, and

4. Get government the hell out of every form of wealth redistribution.

A more complete outline of the plan can be found on the classmates.com profile page of "Alan Jacquemotte".





On Aug 16 08:36 AM hooligan wrote:

> From a trading perspective I can see that it is appropriate to get
> in ahead of a Government that is subsidising bad performance and
> punishing good performance. The failure of the democratic process
> to allow the will of the majority to hold sway over the vested interests
> who continue to "game" the system is disappointing to say the least.
> There is a "truth" that is avoided by all the intervention that the
> Fed, the politicians and the gamesters (who are transferring tax
> payers dollars directly to their own pockets) because it is either
> too easy to avoid the truth, or because they dont understand what
> the truth is. The truth is that if intervention created jobs and
> unemplyment we would have been doing it for decades. It doesn't work
> and never has. Intervention is a communist ideal. The subsidy of
> a favoured cabal that has not only transferred wealth from the economy
> to the cabal by charging exhorbitant fees and transaction costs,
> but can't even preserve the very wealth it transferred. The banking
> model has not failed, what has failed is the willingness to prosecute
> because of fear and lack of ability to see crime. Intervention by
> subidising bad banking practise and exploitation will lead to failure,
> as it always has and always will. Intervention to prosecute those
> who have profited from malpracise in the past and a culture of of
> fair play is the way forward. Anyone who thinks that win/lose for
> a zero sum game is the way forward does not believe in the evolution
> of our civilisation and democratic process. Win/win for an overall
> increase in economic rent is also the way forward.