Wiskey's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/217345/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/165935-max-keiser-oil-trade-s-u-s-dollar-dump-rumors-are-true?source=feed#comment-713220 713220 Back in Jun there was a talk about foreign US embassies were secretly advised to dump their dollars for the local currency.
There is a bit of fallacy in the argument that oil producing countries will loose their biggest customer should they stop pricing the oil in dollars. Russia for instance is only supplying 2% of US needs and OPEC is what, some 25%? It varies greatly. But the fallacy is in admitting that oil producing country would be happy to exchange the valuable and material product for ever depreciating currency. The fallacy is in admission that last year oil and commodities collapse, engineered by US financial cartel and Washington administration are "ok" things to do.

Well, they are no longer "ok", and apparently that is what is behind that new world currency idea and middle finger to US power elite, who just can't help itself, digging the country further into debt and financial machinations. Who impoverished their population with ever perpetuating tax and financial slavery. Who engineers mass delusions with state run media, who has built that wonderful Zoo of 200 mln fat Americans whose only desire in life is to get a new I-phone and watch the next casting of Harry Potter - the virtual "values" which replacing a real values and wealth with the speed of light.]]> Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:48:02 -0400 Back in Jun there was a talk about foreign US embassies were secretly advised to dump their dollars for the local currency.
There is a bit of fallacy in the argument that oil producing countries will loose their biggest customer should they stop pricing the oil in dollars. Russia for instance is only supplying 2% of US needs and OPEC is what, some 25%? It varies greatly. But the fallacy is in admitting that oil producing country would be happy to exchange the valuable and material product for ever depreciating currency. The fallacy is in admission that last year oil and commodities collapse, engineered by US financial cartel and Washington administration are "ok" things to do.

Well, they are no longer "ok", and apparently that is what is behind that new world currency idea and middle finger to US power elite, who just can't help itself, digging the country further into debt and financial machinations. Who impoverished their population with ever perpetuating tax and financial slavery. Who engineers mass delusions with state run media, who has built that wonderful Zoo of 200 mln fat Americans whose only desire in life is to get a new I-phone and watch the next casting of Harry Potter - the virtual "values" which replacing a real values and wealth with the speed of light.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/158081-what-lies-behind-the-cftc-s-revocation-of-exemptions-in-agriculture-position-limits?source=feed#comment-679003 679003 Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:53:37 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/156703-natural-gas-grim-outlook-through-late-2010?source=feed#comment-635725 635725
----------------------...
EOG Bullish in 2010, Sees $7.50-8 Gas Prices

North American natural gas prices are expected to "remain quite low" through the end of 2009, but EOG Resources Inc. is even more bullish about 2010 and 2011 than it was earlier this year, CEO Mark Papa said Friday.

EOG's domestic gas supply model "is telling us that December 2009 domestic production will be 4.8 Bcf/d lower than year-end 2008, and this deficit will deepen further throughout 2010," Papa told financial analysts during an earnings conference call. He shared EOG's macro gas views and detailed the company's 2Q2009 performance.

"When added to the Canadian supply drop of at least 0.8 Bcf/d, we expect the gas market to turn sometime early in 2010, almost regardless of what happens to LNG [liquefied natural gas] imports," he said. "Everybody seems to be focusing on the supply growth from new horizontal plays, but the 800-pound gorilla in the room is Texas vertical gas production. This represents the largest single block of production in the U.S, 16.3 Bcf/d in December 2008, and the rig count here has fallen from 450 rigs in January 2008 to 145 rigs today."

EOG's model "shows production from this large segment of domestic production will fall from 16.3 Bcf/d at year-end 2008 to 13.2 Bcf/d by year-end 2009, and then to 11.6 Bcf /d by year-end 2010, down 4.7 Bcf/d over two years," Papa noted. "In my opinion, this is the most important well population that people should be focusing on if they want to understand what is going to happen to gas supply over the next 24 months."

EOG has hedged almost half of its North American gas from July through December 2009 at $9.03/Mcf, but it has only a "small amount of first-half 2010 gas hedged at $10.27" because of its optimism on gas prices, said Papa.

"We believe that the gas price for 2010 is going to average full-year somewhere between $7.50 and $8," he said. "And I know that sounds dramatically bullish relative to today's Henry Hub price. So we would have to see a price that amount or higher before we would consider hedging for 2010...Our overall 2009 production growth target of 5.5% is still intact, but I will caution investors that this assumes we don't curtail any North American gas in the second half because of market storage issues" (see related story).

EOG, whose production as late as a year ago was weighted to gas, now is about half-weighted to oil projects, including a development in the Bakken play in North Dakota and oil projects in the Barnett Shale of Texas.]]> Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:23:38 -0400
----------------------...
EOG Bullish in 2010, Sees $7.50-8 Gas Prices

North American natural gas prices are expected to "remain quite low" through the end of 2009, but EOG Resources Inc. is even more bullish about 2010 and 2011 than it was earlier this year, CEO Mark Papa said Friday.

EOG's domestic gas supply model "is telling us that December 2009 domestic production will be 4.8 Bcf/d lower than year-end 2008, and this deficit will deepen further throughout 2010," Papa told financial analysts during an earnings conference call. He shared EOG's macro gas views and detailed the company's 2Q2009 performance.

"When added to the Canadian supply drop of at least 0.8 Bcf/d, we expect the gas market to turn sometime early in 2010, almost regardless of what happens to LNG [liquefied natural gas] imports," he said. "Everybody seems to be focusing on the supply growth from new horizontal plays, but the 800-pound gorilla in the room is Texas vertical gas production. This represents the largest single block of production in the U.S, 16.3 Bcf/d in December 2008, and the rig count here has fallen from 450 rigs in January 2008 to 145 rigs today."

EOG's model "shows production from this large segment of domestic production will fall from 16.3 Bcf/d at year-end 2008 to 13.2 Bcf/d by year-end 2009, and then to 11.6 Bcf /d by year-end 2010, down 4.7 Bcf/d over two years," Papa noted. "In my opinion, this is the most important well population that people should be focusing on if they want to understand what is going to happen to gas supply over the next 24 months."

EOG has hedged almost half of its North American gas from July through December 2009 at $9.03/Mcf, but it has only a "small amount of first-half 2010 gas hedged at $10.27" because of its optimism on gas prices, said Papa.

"We believe that the gas price for 2010 is going to average full-year somewhere between $7.50 and $8," he said. "And I know that sounds dramatically bullish relative to today's Henry Hub price. So we would have to see a price that amount or higher before we would consider hedging for 2010...Our overall 2009 production growth target of 5.5% is still intact, but I will caution investors that this assumes we don't curtail any North American gas in the second half because of market storage issues" (see related story).

EOG, whose production as late as a year ago was weighted to gas, now is about half-weighted to oil projects, including a development in the Bakken play in North Dakota and oil projects in the Barnett Shale of Texas.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/156703-natural-gas-grim-outlook-through-late-2010?source=feed#comment-635533 635533
After I read to this point I stopped reading and advise the author to try other things then writing about Nat Gas. "Long time to burn" he says. How long Larry? The 3.8TCF "inventory" is burnable in two month using 60BCF per day rate. Tell that to readers...]]> Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:05:24 -0400
After I read to this point I stopped reading and advise the author to try other things then writing about Nat Gas. "Long time to burn" he says. How long Larry? The 3.8TCF "inventory" is burnable in two month using 60BCF per day rate. Tell that to readers...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/152369-cftc-pushes-for-trading-limits-impact-on-commodity-etfs?source=feed#comment-609230 609230
WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT?!?!

Open interest on Nymex for SEP09 is 177931:
www.nymex.com/ng_fut_c...

UNG holds 22,151 of those: www.unitedstatesnatura...

How is that UNG hold price of the Nat Gas down, when UNG buys and holds till rollover? And rollovers are spread on just 4 days in a month? Why is then Nat Gas goes unstoppable down for more then a year, when UNG was active seller only during 4*12=48 days?

Please, please, please, do at lest _some_ research before you re-post newspapers disinformation. Or better yet, just disappear from the info space. You just pollute it with stupid allegations, repetitions of other's "news" and serious lack of any meaning in your mumblings. ]]> Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:25:05 -0400
WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT?!?!

Open interest on Nymex for SEP09 is 177931:
www.nymex.com/ng_fut_c...

UNG holds 22,151 of those: www.unitedstatesnatura...

How is that UNG hold price of the Nat Gas down, when UNG buys and holds till rollover? And rollovers are spread on just 4 days in a month? Why is then Nat Gas goes unstoppable down for more then a year, when UNG was active seller only during 4*12=48 days?

Please, please, please, do at lest _some_ research before you re-post newspapers disinformation. Or better yet, just disappear from the info space. You just pollute it with stupid allegations, repetitions of other's "news" and serious lack of any meaning in your mumblings. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/148234-how-30-barrel-oil-could-save-the-world?source=feed#comment-584788 584788 What the hell you are talking about? Get the pill and relax. These are not connected subjects or very little correlated. Stop fantasizing about something non existent. Stop looking for a foes abroad, look for then inside the border.]]> Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:44:34 -0400 What the hell you are talking about? Get the pill and relax. These are not connected subjects or very little correlated. Stop fantasizing about something non existent. Stop looking for a foes abroad, look for then inside the border.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/news/market_currents/post/27100?source=feed#comment-570440 570440
www.choiresicha.com/wh...]]> Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:51:24 -0400
www.choiresicha.com/wh...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/144180-global-farmland-disappearing-at-an-alarming-rate?source=feed#comment-554385 554385
Otherwise great job, thanks!]]> Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:44:20 -0400
Otherwise great job, thanks!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/142057-the-coming-economic-collapse-part-3?source=feed#comment-539365 539365 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:21:41 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/142100-five-respected-investors-weigh-in?source=feed#comment-539139 539139 russiatoday.com/Top_Ne...


On Jun 09 11:45 AM kmarkt2 wrote:

> You need Mr Putin to force the oligarchs at Wall Street to walk the
> talk as he did with the oligarchs at Pikalyovo, near St Petersberg.
> Grab the article, written by Irina Titova, AP. You can assess this
> article from the AP website, type in "Putin" in the search.]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:06:41 -0400 russiatoday.com/Top_Ne...


On Jun 09 11:45 AM kmarkt2 wrote:

> You need Mr Putin to force the oligarchs at Wall Street to walk the
> talk as he did with the oligarchs at Pikalyovo, near St Petersberg.
> Grab the article, written by Irina Titova, AP. You can assess this
> article from the AP website, type in "Putin" in the search.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/138177-steer-clear-of-shipping-s-baltic-dry-index?source=feed#comment-508797 508797 Please answer:
1. Why we should steer clear of BDI?
2. Why should we be cautious to one who uses BDI for historical correlation to back up their argument?
3. Same for shipping.
4. Why you want to write just few unrelated statements and post it on SA?

Is it all because BDI felt 90% from its peak?

5. If you are a smart person, please give us an explanation what BDI represents.]]> Mon, 18 May 2009 16:57:54 -0400 Please answer:
1. Why we should steer clear of BDI?
2. Why should we be cautious to one who uses BDI for historical correlation to back up their argument?
3. Same for shipping.
4. Why you want to write just few unrelated statements and post it on SA?

Is it all because BDI felt 90% from its peak?

5. If you are a smart person, please give us an explanation what BDI represents.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/137539-has-natural-gas-hit-bottom?source=feed#comment-504366 504366 seekingalpha.com/artic...

----------------------...
I am seeing United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG), as an excellent buy here and I see it less affected by turbulence in the general market. I bought UNG at around $33 myself. I also suggest buying NGAS (NGAS) as it is an unconventional natural gas play, with a nice ticker name others are jealous for.
----------------------...

Reading your passages about Einstein style shaving as a basis to short consumer staples stocks, makes me just wonder: are you really that stupid, or it just you trying to look that way?



On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> Thu, 14 May 2009 17:06:21 -0400 seekingalpha.com/artic...

----------------------...
I am seeing United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG), as an excellent buy here and I see it less affected by turbulence in the general market. I bought UNG at around $33 myself. I also suggest buying NGAS (NGAS) as it is an unconventional natural gas play, with a nice ticker name others are jealous for.
----------------------...

Reading your passages about Einstein style shaving as a basis to short consumer staples stocks, makes me just wonder: are you really that stupid, or it just you trying to look that way?



On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/137539-has-natural-gas-hit-bottom?source=feed#comment-503913 503913 I remember you were saying some BS about commodity selling below cost of production. Funny - a massive load on a position which lost 50%. Good job, pal...


On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> Thu, 14 May 2009 13:14:46 -0400 I remember you were saying some BS about commodity selling below cost of production. Funny - a massive load on a position which lost 50%. Good job, pal...


On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/137539-has-natural-gas-hit-bottom?source=feed#comment-503908 503908 Funny - a massive load on a position which lost 50%...

On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> Thu, 14 May 2009 13:12:45 -0400 Funny - a massive load on a position which lost 50%...

On May 14 10:44 AM Mark Anthony wrote:

> Andrew:
>
> I absolutely agree that natural gas price has bottomed. I am actually
> even more optimistic than you are, in the natural gas price recovery.
> I started to load UNG at $15.50 on the way down, and then massively
> loaded up tons UNG in the $13 to $14 price range. They are more than
> 1/8 of my portfolio now.
>
> A few points you have not touched on: The cost of natural gas production.
> Natural gas production in the USA boomed in recent two years due
> to the development of shale gas, which is expensive to produce and
> the production per well start to decline more quickly than conventional
> natural gas wells. Natural gas price needs to be at least $13 for
> the shale gas production to be profitable. The current price is too
> much lower than intrinsic cost for producers to have any incentive
> to drill replacement wells.
>
> If there are any drill rigs left at all, they are only there because
> the producers predict the gas price will come back to double digits
> soon. If they don't see it that way, there won't be a single drilling
> rig.
>
> Further, you should make the cost argument on LNG importation as
> well. Simply because you have build some LNG importation terminal
> does not mean LNG ships from all over the world will come to your
> port. It depends on price. US LNG importation has collapsed from
> the high just two years ago. The LNG ships are expensive to build
> and have limited shipping capacities. Other countries in the world
> are paying much higher prices for the LNG.
>
> I look around and see nothing else that has as much a certainty as
> UNG, to go up quadruple from current level, in as short a time period
> as 9 months. It's time to massively load up UNG.
>
> seekingalpha.com/autho...
> ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/95687-today-s-true-safe-haven-investments?source=feed#comment-257883 257883 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:33:02 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/91976-russia-s-strategic-intent-to-use-energy-as-a-weapon-has-increased?source=feed#comment-236111 236111
Looks like you pretend to be quite an expert on Soviet Union. Where did you learn about all these? "nazi", "sound as Venezuela" ? Tell us just one example to support this garbage. Oh wait, I guess you learned from CNN. Now, listen this, my friend, I'd say United States is more comparable of what Nazis were doing. Here is a link to your senator telling the truth. Openly and honestly: www.ronpaullibrary.org...
Quote: "There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with."

Truly Fascist's proportions for the human extermination. Tell me now, any single fact about Soviet Union being "murderous as Nazi Germany"?
How about United States using depleted uranium warheads in most of the local conflicts? In Serbia and Iraq are being most recent. Have you read about these? Did Soviets ever do the same? Tell us then what was the crime. Pathetic liar you are!

And lastly, your typos in almost every sentence, show your education level, which doesn't go much beyond the third grade. What can we learn from you, then?]]> Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:23:13 -0400
Looks like you pretend to be quite an expert on Soviet Union. Where did you learn about all these? "nazi", "sound as Venezuela" ? Tell us just one example to support this garbage. Oh wait, I guess you learned from CNN. Now, listen this, my friend, I'd say United States is more comparable of what Nazis were doing. Here is a link to your senator telling the truth. Openly and honestly: www.ronpaullibrary.org...
Quote: "There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with."

Truly Fascist's proportions for the human extermination. Tell me now, any single fact about Soviet Union being "murderous as Nazi Germany"?
How about United States using depleted uranium warheads in most of the local conflicts? In Serbia and Iraq are being most recent. Have you read about these? Did Soviets ever do the same? Tell us then what was the crime. Pathetic liar you are!

And lastly, your typos in almost every sentence, show your education level, which doesn't go much beyond the third grade. What can we learn from you, then?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/91976-russia-s-strategic-intent-to-use-energy-as-a-weapon-has-increased?source=feed#comment-236110 236110
Looks like you pretend to be quite an expert on Soviet Union. Where did you learn about all these? "nazi", "sound as Venezuela" ? Tell us just one example to support this garbage. Oh wait, I guess you learned from CNN. Now, listen this, my friend, I'd say United States is more comparable of what Nazis were doing. Here is a link to your senator telling the truth. Openly and honestly: www.ronpaullibrary.org...
Quote: "There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with."

Truly Fascist's proportions for the human extermination. Tell me now, any single fact about Soviet Union being "murderous as Nazi Germany"?
How about United States using depleted uranium warheads in most of the local conflicts? In Serbia and Iraq are being most recent. Have you read about these? Did Soviets ever do the same? Tell us then what was the crime. Pathetic liar you are!

And lastly, your typos in almost every sentence, show your education level, which doesn't go much beyond the third grade. What we can learn from you, then?]]> Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:23:11 -0400
Looks like you pretend to be quite an expert on Soviet Union. Where did you learn about all these? "nazi", "sound as Venezuela" ? Tell us just one example to support this garbage. Oh wait, I guess you learned from CNN. Now, listen this, my friend, I'd say United States is more comparable of what Nazis were doing. Here is a link to your senator telling the truth. Openly and honestly: www.ronpaullibrary.org...
Quote: "There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with."

Truly Fascist's proportions for the human extermination. Tell me now, any single fact about Soviet Union being "murderous as Nazi Germany"?
How about United States using depleted uranium warheads in most of the local conflicts? In Serbia and Iraq are being most recent. Have you read about these? Did Soviets ever do the same? Tell us then what was the crime. Pathetic liar you are!

And lastly, your typos in almost every sentence, show your education level, which doesn't go much beyond the third grade. What we can learn from you, then?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/91976-russia-s-strategic-intent-to-use-energy-as-a-weapon-has-increased?source=feed#comment-235979 235979 www.russiatoday.com/en]]> Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:20:21 -0400 www.russiatoday.com/en]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/91976-russia-s-strategic-intent-to-use-energy-as-a-weapon-has-increased?source=feed#comment-235977 235977 I was shocked by the amount of lies coming out of the US media during this Georgia crisis. No word to mention who started the genocide, why it happened. They all blame it on Russians. Georgia president openly spreading lies on CNN several times, every day. Here folks, simple fact: Russians liberated Georgians from Turkish occupation. Russians and Georgians were living together for 300 years. Three hundred years!!! In peace. And what is happening now, is new-con fascists are feeding the extremism ideology supplying money and weapons to Georgia and secretively conducting acts of genocide.

Go to russiatoday.com and get the idea. CNN is a weapon of mass delusion - a Pentagon arm.]]> Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:17:30 -0400 I was shocked by the amount of lies coming out of the US media during this Georgia crisis. No word to mention who started the genocide, why it happened. They all blame it on Russians. Georgia president openly spreading lies on CNN several times, every day. Here folks, simple fact: Russians liberated Georgians from Turkish occupation. Russians and Georgians were living together for 300 years. Three hundred years!!! In peace. And what is happening now, is new-con fascists are feeding the extremism ideology supplying money and weapons to Georgia and secretively conducting acts of genocide.

Go to russiatoday.com and get the idea. CNN is a weapon of mass delusion - a Pentagon arm.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/91274-america-s-fiscal-crisis-tough-decisions-needed-now?source=feed#comment-232351 232351 www.ronpaullibrary.org...

Think about it: Nazis were killing people in concentration camps by thousands. How US is different here? Bush and co are committing crime of the Hitler's proportions.
]]> Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:15:15 -0400 www.ronpaullibrary.org...

Think about it: Nazis were killing people in concentration camps by thousands. How US is different here? Bush and co are committing crime of the Hitler's proportions.
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/83527-first-industrial-realty-a-reit-with-an-attractive-risk-reward?source=feed#comment-197305 197305 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:28:31 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/82848-dollar-destruction-my-wealth-inequality-manifesto?source=feed#comment-193743 193743 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...) How come world best democracy has that rate? Well maybe it is not really a democracy anymore but a suppression machine to re-distribute the wealth from poor and middle to richest and export this ideology across the rest of the World.]]> Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:14:44 -0400 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...) How come world best democracy has that rate? Well maybe it is not really a democracy anymore but a suppression machine to re-distribute the wealth from poor and middle to richest and export this ideology across the rest of the World.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/82848-dollar-destruction-my-wealth-inequality-manifesto?source=feed#comment-193735 193735
Thank you for the analytics!]]> Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:05:24 -0400
Thank you for the analytics!]]>