hillerby55

Tech Trader: Microvision Plunges On Negative Seeking Alpha Post

If Eric Savitz wants to comment and say "That all may well be true, but the fuzzy ID for Mulcahy - and the willingness of Seeking Alpha to post material of unclear origin - makes me a little queasy."
then why doesn't Eric do some DD on the article and first see if
there is any merit to them. MVIS was given time to respond to Seeking Alpha's posting of Liam's article when MVIS compained to Seeking Alpha of inaccuracies in the story. He fails to mention that so far MVIS either hasn't explained these inaccuracies or Seeking Alpha won't print them. Seeking Alpha needs to be open and report and post all the party"s responsess involved so we, the readers can make up our minds. Eric's choice of words basically saying the article was the reason for the drop ( I believe it was naked shorts) might be the same reason that Eric's own negative article on Spain possibly cutting subsidies was the cause for solars to drop. I am a little queasy myself.