The compounded return of the Buffett partnership from 1956 to 1969 would be more impressive than what you've cited.
As for BRK.A, the 1997 peak was at $84,000 and as I write, it's priced at $94,050, This translates to .94% for that 12 years. No dividend involved. Hence, woefully pales to................ cash.
Adjust it for inflation, and what do you have?
Yes, I am well aware of massaging data with origins, but I chose 1997 as the pinnacle of the buy and hold posture Buffett advocates (but doesn't necessarily follow). Since then, net net, less than a per cent per annum nominal
I'll spare you on Munsingwear, US Air (gee that rhymed) as well as sweetheart deals or delving into foreign currency.
But, I will commend on your ability to spell thus avoiding confusion with all-you-can-eat diners in a northern suburb of Detroit. An aspect many groupies fail at.
Always More to Learn From Buffett [View article]
As for BRK.A, the 1997 peak was at $84,000 and as I write, it's priced at $94,050, This translates to .94% for that 12 years. No dividend involved. Hence, woefully pales to................ cash.
Adjust it for inflation, and what do you have?
Yes, I am well aware of massaging data with origins, but I chose 1997 as the pinnacle of the buy and hold posture Buffett advocates (but doesn't necessarily follow). Since then, net net, less than a per cent per annum nominal
I'll spare you on Munsingwear, US Air (gee that rhymed) as well as sweetheart deals or delving into foreign currency.
But, I will commend on your ability to spell thus avoiding confusion with all-you-can-eat diners in a northern suburb of Detroit. An aspect many groupies fail at.