Its not unusual for a company to post information on itself to drive it's own stock down to conduct a stock buy back. When that happens and the is evidenced by an actual stock buy back it could indicate that the company is intentionally manipulating the market under "insider trading" ethnical violations because of personal knowledge that in the next year they ae going to release a product that will shoot their stock value through the roof. I don't think that the First Amendment covers this sort of cat and mouse game. As I stated before this is all illegal under the Constitution and Laws of our Government, but who does the enforcing. There is Case Law through the roof on claims of slander, lies, etc being protected under the First Amendment right to an Opinion..... this idea was shot down in each case all the way up to the Supreme Court.
-
Its not unusual for a company to post information on itself to drive it's own stock down to conduct a stock buy back. When that happens and the is evidenced by an actual stock buy back it could indicate that the company is intentionally manipulating the market under "insider trading" ethnical violations because of personal knowledge that in the next year they ae going to release a product that will shoot their stock value through the roof. I don't think that the First Amendment covers this sort of cat and mouse game. As I stated before this is all illegal under the Constitution and Laws of our Government, but who does the enforcing. There is Case Law through the roof on claims of slander, lies, etc being protected under the First Amendment right to an Opinion..... this idea was shot down in each case all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Jul 15 11:29 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by QUESTIONABLE »Can the SEC Really 'Quell Rumors'? [View article]