<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Steven Hansen's Comments</title>
    <description>Steven Hansen's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/226469/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>The Biggest Reason For Weak Economic Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1474901/comments?source=feed#comment-19632201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19632201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[consider startups pay taxes other than income taxes ...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:53:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[consider startups pay taxes other than income taxes ...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Overview - A Gnarly Economy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1752301-economic-overview-a-gnarly-economy?source=feed#comment-17596791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17596791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[yes - i have read this but the weakness was caused by the weather also.  one month is not a trend unless it fits within the existing trend.  the trend is downward - and March fits into this trend.  does bad weather help sales - hell no!  but i ask you when was the last time you heard that the data was good because of good weather?<br/><br/>all of these indices are noisy.  census pasteurizes and homogenizes the data to the extent you do not understand whether you are coming or going.  there are a lot of dynamics in play - but i suggest the number of paydays in the month may be the governing dynamic.  there were 5 paydays in March.  this tailwind should have pushed up retail sales.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:58:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[yes - i have read this but the weakness was caused by the weather also.  one month is not a trend unless it fits within the existing trend.  the trend is downward - and March fits into this trend.  does bad weather help sales - hell no!  but i ask you when was the last time you heard that the data was good because of good weather?<br/><br/>all of these indices are noisy.  census pasteurizes and homogenizes the data to the extent you do not understand whether you are coming or going.  there are a lot of dynamics in play - but i suggest the number of paydays in the month may be the governing dynamic.  there were 5 paydays in March.  this tailwind should have pushed up retail sales.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The Market Overbought?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1324991/comments?source=feed#comment-17352361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17352361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[and i also am uncertain, and that is why i wrote it the way i did.  i do think that if i was not invested that i would increase my holdings right now - and if i was invested, that i would increase my holdings.  this is not 2008 - and the dynamics are considerably different (and i consider the possibility of a major correction  to be pretty low).<br/><br/>but the real point is that the eurocrisis is not necessarily negative to the USA economy.  we are seeing today inflows from Europe (and Japan).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:04:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[and i also am uncertain, and that is why i wrote it the way i did.  i do think that if i was not invested that i would increase my holdings right now - and if i was invested, that i would increase my holdings.  this is not 2008 - and the dynamics are considerably different (and i consider the possibility of a major correction  to be pretty low).<br/><br/>but the real point is that the eurocrisis is not necessarily negative to the USA economy.  we are seeing today inflows from Europe (and Japan).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government Debt Is Not Under Control</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1280501/comments?source=feed#comment-16434011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16434011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[maximusIII - this is the right question.  this post was a think piece.  too many argue theory without thinking through mechanics.  i personally believe sovereign debt needs to be a problem.  the problem is the way we account for it - and stupidly pay interest on the debt so that an economic growth spurts start crowding out the federal budget.  i want people to understand the disingenuous arguments on all sides ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:45:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[maximusIII - this is the right question.  this post was a think piece.  too many argue theory without thinking through mechanics.  i personally believe sovereign debt needs to be a problem.  the problem is the way we account for it - and stupidly pay interest on the debt so that an economic growth spurts start crowding out the federal budget.  i want people to understand the disingenuous arguments on all sides ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weekly Economic Review: Seems The Economy Is Great, Or Is It?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1632011-weekly-economic-review-seems-the-economy-is-great-or-is-it?source=feed#comment-16090271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16090271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dancing - if either party had a plan to get the USA house in order, i would be encouraged.  but neither do, and a stupid solution being compromised with another stupid solution does not make a good solution.<br/><br/>i do not see any solution using the current economic and fiscal tools we believe are proper - therefore the solution is in tools most are rejecting, or in tools we have yet to envision.  on tool - i see no reason for the government to issue debt documents, but on the other hand, i fear the government would destroy the economy.<br/><br/>but in all cases we need to regear the economy.  our social programs are not in sync with the way the fiscal part of the economy is structure.  there are many ways to do this.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:04:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dancing - if either party had a plan to get the USA house in order, i would be encouraged.  but neither do, and a stupid solution being compromised with another stupid solution does not make a good solution.<br/><br/>i do not see any solution using the current economic and fiscal tools we believe are proper - therefore the solution is in tools most are rejecting, or in tools we have yet to envision.  on tool - i see no reason for the government to issue debt documents, but on the other hand, i fear the government would destroy the economy.<br/><br/>but in all cases we need to regear the economy.  our social programs are not in sync with the way the fiscal part of the economy is structure.  there are many ways to do this.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Falling Down The Economic Elevator Shaft</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1260711/comments?source=feed#comment-16088951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16088951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[good point  -the cuts in the USA are far from what has been seen in southern Europe.  Glad this was the first comment so we can understand that federal spending rises over the next few years in dollar terms but falls relative to the size of the economy.<br/><br/>This article was drafted in response to those who believe it is possible to cut spending to get the federal budget in order.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:07:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[good point  -the cuts in the USA are far from what has been seen in southern Europe.  Glad this was the first comment so we can understand that federal spending rises over the next few years in dollar terms but falls relative to the size of the economy.<br/><br/>This article was drafted in response to those who believe it is possible to cut spending to get the federal budget in order.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weekly Summary: Sequester Is NOT The Big Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1607071-weekly-summary-sequester-is-not-the-big-story?source=feed#comment-15758801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15758801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i am repeating the lies of the talking heads - but it was dividends and bonuses.  (i am unsure how &quot;special&quot; they were).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 09:07:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i am repeating the lies of the talking heads - but it was dividends and bonuses.  (i am unsure how &quot;special&quot; they were).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suppressing Economic Growth By Taxation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1152381/comments?source=feed#comment-14527341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14527341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bingo - there is a big difference between tax rates and what the taxpayer gets from the government.  if the tax rate was 80%, and the government paid housing, food, transportation, higher education and medical expenses - that would be a good tax rate.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:21:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bingo - there is a big difference between tax rates and what the taxpayer gets from the government.  if the tax rate was 80%, and the government paid housing, food, transportation, higher education and medical expenses - that would be a good tax rate.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suppressing Economic Growth By Taxation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1152381/comments?source=feed#comment-14527171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14527171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[all good points.  consider though that europe has a large VAT around 20% which was not included, and some states (like mine) have no state taxes. no chart tell the correct story for a particular individual..<br/><br/>having worked in several countries on the list - i think the list is &quot;relatively&quot; correct - but as you point out may be lacking in expressing the total tax load.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:13:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[all good points.  consider though that europe has a large VAT around 20% which was not included, and some states (like mine) have no state taxes. no chart tell the correct story for a particular individual..<br/><br/>having worked in several countries on the list - i think the list is &quot;relatively&quot; correct - but as you point out may be lacking in expressing the total tax load.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Anyone Really Understand What Is Going On With Employment?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1108391/comments?source=feed#comment-13637761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13637761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[you are correct - the labels in the graphs were reversed.  however the point remains the same that the young hold fewer jobs as a percent of the population, and the old hold more jobs as a percentage of the population.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:34:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[you are correct - the labels in the graphs were reversed.  however the point remains the same that the young hold fewer jobs as a percent of the population, and the old hold more jobs as a percentage of the population.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Student Loans Destroying Consumption?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1086811/comments?source=feed#comment-13136251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13136251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe the biggest problem is the people who never go to university.  most people leave high school with no skills or real world ability (balancing checkbooks, trade skills, computer skills, etc).  if you want a nation of idiots, the lower and secondary education system is preparing most to be idiots.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:54:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe the biggest problem is the people who never go to university.  most people leave high school with no skills or real world ability (balancing checkbooks, trade skills, computer skills, etc).  if you want a nation of idiots, the lower and secondary education system is preparing most to be idiots.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Trade Deficit Grows The U.S. Debt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1066221/comments?source=feed#comment-12652301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12652301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[great links pigdog.  although my opinion is contrary to the argument laid out in these two links - i believe one is educated by by understanding the other side of the coin.  these arguments have validity as the USA monetary and fiscal policy is based on handling currency operations like the USA had a back currency - so the potential positive advantage of a fiat currency is not being utilized.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:36:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[great links pigdog.  although my opinion is contrary to the argument laid out in these two links - i believe one is educated by by understanding the other side of the coin.  these arguments have validity as the USA monetary and fiscal policy is based on handling currency operations like the USA had a back currency - so the potential positive advantage of a fiat currency is not being utilized.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fiscal Cliff Will Destroy The Economy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1052931/comments?source=feed#comment-12408491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12408491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[you are right that tax rate correlation to disposable income cannot be universally true.  if the government took 100%, obviously that would remove all income.  but this statement was within the context of historical changes in the USA (and not France or Zimbabwe).  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:15:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[you are right that tax rate correlation to disposable income cannot be universally true.  if the government took 100%, obviously that would remove all income.  but this statement was within the context of historical changes in the USA (and not France or Zimbabwe).  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should We Take ECRI's Recession Call Seriously?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1328951-should-we-take-ecri-s-recession-call-seriously?source=feed#comment-12165661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12165661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i am not a person who takes a single metric and runs with it.  even a metric which historically been 100% accurate fails because of a specific set of conditions with manifest.  as an example, our economic forecast uses a weighted set of approximately 10 metrics which we believe are accurate in real time.  off the top of my head, i believe two of the 10 metrics were in contraction.<br/><br/>i am not a lover of using monetary metrics (as you know) - so obviously i am not using this for any of my forecasting.  i would use this as a secondary or confirming metric to what the other metrics are saying.  i tend to lean heaviest on transport metrics, followed by import metrics.  i would love to rely on certain employment metrics but i do not trust them in real time.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:40:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i am not a person who takes a single metric and runs with it.  even a metric which historically been 100% accurate fails because of a specific set of conditions with manifest.  as an example, our economic forecast uses a weighted set of approximately 10 metrics which we believe are accurate in real time.  off the top of my head, i believe two of the 10 metrics were in contraction.<br/><br/>i am not a lover of using monetary metrics (as you know) - so obviously i am not using this for any of my forecasting.  i would use this as a secondary or confirming metric to what the other metrics are saying.  i tend to lean heaviest on transport metrics, followed by import metrics.  i would love to rely on certain employment metrics but i do not trust them in real time.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should We Take ECRI's Recession Call Seriously?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1328951-should-we-take-ecri-s-recession-call-seriously?source=feed#comment-12157411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12157411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[the bls data is the worst for getting it right in real time.  they need at least 6 months, or a year and six months :)  of course looking back at employment in the past recessions using historical data - what you are saying fits. <br/><br/>a forecasting tool we use for forecasting employment is at the same levels (and downtrending) when the USA entered the great recession.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 21:24:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[the bls data is the worst for getting it right in real time.  they need at least 6 months, or a year and six months :)  of course looking back at employment in the past recessions using historical data - what you are saying fits. <br/><br/>a forecasting tool we use for forecasting employment is at the same levels (and downtrending) when the USA entered the great recession.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should We Take ECRI's Recession Call Seriously?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/226469-steven-hansen/1328951-should-we-take-ecri-s-recession-call-seriously?source=feed#comment-12157301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12157301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[it will not be a credit driven crisis like 2007 / 8, but it will be a lower consumption event - driven in part because the great recessions debt imbalance has not cleared yet.  at main street level (which is how our index is geared), it may not even be noticeable.  <br/><br/>in 4Q2012, there will be a significant headwind from inventory depletion - and my bet is there will be a slight reduction in consumption based on trend lines.   this would be more than enough to put the USA in a technical recession.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 21:11:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[it will not be a credit driven crisis like 2007 / 8, but it will be a lower consumption event - driven in part because the great recessions debt imbalance has not cleared yet.  at main street level (which is how our index is geared), it may not even be noticeable.  <br/><br/>in 4Q2012, there will be a significant headwind from inventory depletion - and my bet is there will be a slight reduction in consumption based on trend lines.   this would be more than enough to put the USA in a technical recession.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twinkies And Employment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1026191/comments?source=feed#comment-11919851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11919851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i am a supporter of things that work - the situation in the Reuters article is a disgrace.  the problem with public sector unionization is that they can politically fund the elected officials who are representing the &quot;management&quot;  side - a clear conflict of interest.<br/><br/>the concept of collective bargaining is based on two opposing sides - where is the opposing side if both parties are sitting on the same side of the table?  it was Kennedy signed Executive Order 10988 which started this ball rolling.  It is clear that this process has now created several monsters - and that the system itself needs adjustment.<br/><br/>At this moment, it likely is the government itself who is the villain.  the political system created a law, and left it on the books even when there is evidence it is not working correctly.   The process throughout the federal, state and local governments needs sunset provisions on all laws and regulations.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:54:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i am a supporter of things that work - the situation in the Reuters article is a disgrace.  the problem with public sector unionization is that they can politically fund the elected officials who are representing the &quot;management&quot;  side - a clear conflict of interest.<br/><br/>the concept of collective bargaining is based on two opposing sides - where is the opposing side if both parties are sitting on the same side of the table?  it was Kennedy signed Executive Order 10988 which started this ball rolling.  It is clear that this process has now created several monsters - and that the system itself needs adjustment.<br/><br/>At this moment, it likely is the government itself who is the villain.  the political system created a law, and left it on the books even when there is evidence it is not working correctly.   The process throughout the federal, state and local governments needs sunset provisions on all laws and regulations.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can They Spare A Penny A Click For International Coverage?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/899162-jon-springer/1274961-can-they-spare-a-penny-a-click-for-international-coverage?source=feed#comment-11587521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11587521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Jon - as a publisher of another blog, i can say that SA knows what sells and does not - and likely they have an optimum number (not unlimited) of slots daily (likely arranged by subject matter).  <br/><br/>their mailing lists are predicated on subject matter - and doubt they have a mailing list for &quot;sri lanka&quot;.  so they are trying to get you to conform to their system by getting you to match your posts investment touts to their system.<br/><br/>all of the authors on SA have had your problem in the past - and yes, it upsets me when it happens - so i can totally sympathize.  but SA offers great exposure, and the good more than makes up for this kind of frustration.<br/><br/>good luck.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:37:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jon - as a publisher of another blog, i can say that SA knows what sells and does not - and likely they have an optimum number (not unlimited) of slots daily (likely arranged by subject matter).  <br/><br/>their mailing lists are predicated on subject matter - and doubt they have a mailing list for &quot;sri lanka&quot;.  so they are trying to get you to conform to their system by getting you to match your posts investment touts to their system.<br/><br/>all of the authors on SA have had your problem in the past - and yes, it upsets me when it happens - so i can totally sympathize.  but SA offers great exposure, and the good more than makes up for this kind of frustration.<br/><br/>good luck.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects Of Obamacare On Employment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/997621/comments?source=feed#comment-11490341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11490341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i too would conclude it is time to buy stock in temp staffing companies,]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:00:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i too would conclude it is time to buy stock in temp staffing companies,]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects Of Obamacare On Employment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/997621/comments?source=feed#comment-11487651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11487651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[every one is entitled to their opinions - but facts are facts.<br/><br/>trade unions, companies - all got waivers of various types for Obamacare.  i have not read each one, but the waivers expire differently, and all expire by 2014.<br/><br/>the Nebraska waiver was given to all states in the final reconciliation of the bill before it became law.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:34:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[every one is entitled to their opinions - but facts are facts.<br/><br/>trade unions, companies - all got waivers of various types for Obamacare.  i have not read each one, but the waivers expire differently, and all expire by 2014.<br/><br/>the Nebraska waiver was given to all states in the final reconciliation of the bill before it became law.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects Of Obamacare On Employment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/997621/comments?source=feed#comment-11471701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11471701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Under the law, companies will be responsible for providing coverage for workers or they will face government penalties -- but not for employees who log fewer than 30 hours per week on average. <br/><br/>it is important that disinformation be refuted.  please refer to the USA governments own website : <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/TTxy0o'>http://1.usa.gov/TTxy0o</a>   which states the following:<br/><br/>&quot;Employers may refuse or restrict [Obamacare] coverage for other reasons (such as part-time employment), as long as these are unrelated to your health status and are applied consistently.&quot;<br/><br/>so no - 100 part time employees are not equal to 96 full time.  the law specifically exempts employers from Obamacare for part-time employees.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:45:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Under the law, companies will be responsible for providing coverage for workers or they will face government penalties -- but not for employees who log fewer than 30 hours per week on average. <br/><br/>it is important that disinformation be refuted.  please refer to the USA governments own website : <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/TTxy0o'>http://1.usa.gov/TTxy0o</a>   which states the following:<br/><br/>&quot;Employers may refuse or restrict [Obamacare] coverage for other reasons (such as part-time employment), as long as these are unrelated to your health status and are applied consistently.&quot;<br/><br/>so no - 100 part time employees are not equal to 96 full time.  the law specifically exempts employers from Obamacare for part-time employees.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Growing Goods Import Problem?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/976491/comments?source=feed#comment-11231511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11231511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[untrusting, <br/>i have read both yours and PM's comments and both are correct.  what PM is saying that the USA system taxes domestic production - and does not tax foreign production.  most countries refund all taxes paid for exports (the USA does not do this either).<br/><br/>so the USA starts from an inferior position - and this is the problem.  VAT is the only way around this that i am aware (duties are not possible under current agreements). <br/><br/>However, your points on the income tax system are equally as valid.  I don't see why a VAT system cannot coexist with the existing system for goods.  many countries allow credit by individuals and companies against income taxes for VAT paid.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[untrusting, <br/>i have read both yours and PM's comments and both are correct.  what PM is saying that the USA system taxes domestic production - and does not tax foreign production.  most countries refund all taxes paid for exports (the USA does not do this either).<br/><br/>so the USA starts from an inferior position - and this is the problem.  VAT is the only way around this that i am aware (duties are not possible under current agreements). <br/><br/>However, your points on the income tax system are equally as valid.  I don't see why a VAT system cannot coexist with the existing system for goods.  many countries allow credit by individuals and companies against income taxes for VAT paid.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Growing Goods Import Problem?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/976491/comments?source=feed#comment-11228011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11228011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[yes - you are correct.  the issue is not to whether to import or not import - but to avoid creating a wild west where manufacturing dynamics are harmed.  i am not talking about protectionism - but order.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:55:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[yes - you are correct.  the issue is not to whether to import or not import - but to avoid creating a wild west where manufacturing dynamics are harmed.  i am not talking about protectionism - but order.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Growing Goods Import Problem?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/976491/comments?source=feed#comment-11227901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11227901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[maybe the statement should have been in quotes because this is what i hear everyday - not what i believe.  the entire post disputed this lead statement.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:49:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[maybe the statement should have been in quotes because this is what i hear everyday - not what i believe.  the entire post disputed this lead statement.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Growing Goods Import Problem?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/976491/comments?source=feed#comment-11216131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11216131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[nicely said Derryl.  trade is a much more complex issue than data and charts.  until we have a perfect world, the economic theories of free trade being beneficial to the common man should be taken with a grain of salt.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:43:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[nicely said Derryl.  trade is a much more complex issue than data and charts.  until we have a perfect world, the economic theories of free trade being beneficial to the common man should be taken with a grain of salt.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trade Data Is Showing Nasty Economic Trends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922271/comments?source=feed#comment-10512071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10512071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[logical - yes, more and more use of containers in lieu of bulk shipping on rail cars via containers, or simply longer movements of trailers on rail.  HOWEVER, i am not claiming that even without these effects that intermodal is not growing.  my belief is that you need to discount some portion of that growth.  <br/><br/>every week i review the rail situation overall by backing out coal and grain <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RoHHOo'>http://bit.ly/RoHHOo</a>.  note that the last two or three weeks have started showing improvement in the intuitive portions.  however, for economic trends, i have been using a four week rolling average which is just beginning to show a POSSIBLE trend change.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:02:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[logical - yes, more and more use of containers in lieu of bulk shipping on rail cars via containers, or simply longer movements of trailers on rail.  HOWEVER, i am not claiming that even without these effects that intermodal is not growing.  my belief is that you need to discount some portion of that growth.  <br/><br/>every week i review the rail situation overall by backing out coal and grain <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RoHHOo'>http://bit.ly/RoHHOo</a>.  note that the last two or three weeks have started showing improvement in the intuitive portions.  however, for economic trends, i have been using a four week rolling average which is just beginning to show a POSSIBLE trend change.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8% Of The Pre-Great Recession Workforce Still MIA</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/908641/comments?source=feed#comment-10253821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10253821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Freddie, the Econintersect index is not forecasting GDP - but the parallel universe of the consumer.  this universe is not necessarily in phase with gdp.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:04:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Freddie, the Econintersect index is not forecasting GDP - but the parallel universe of the consumer.  this universe is not necessarily in phase with gdp.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gasoline Purchases Plummeting: Another Recession Indicator?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/882471/comments?source=feed#comment-9788181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9788181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[food for thought - the percentage of the population working is basically unchanged for the last 3 years.  intuitively, this makes metrics like miles driven good economic indicators.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:18:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[food for thought - the percentage of the population working is basically unchanged for the last 3 years.  intuitively, this makes metrics like miles driven good economic indicators.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gasoline Purchases Plummeting: Another Recession Indicator?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/882471/comments?source=feed#comment-9787991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9787991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just to be clear - this post tried to show that miles driven was not correlating to fuel consumed.  Miles driven is not a real time stat and lags by 3 months (so it is unusable as an economic forecasting tool).  Fuel consumed is almost real time so it would be a good tool IF IT CORRELATED TO MILES DRIVEN.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:15:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just to be clear - this post tried to show that miles driven was not correlating to fuel consumed.  Miles driven is not a real time stat and lags by 3 months (so it is unusable as an economic forecasting tool).  Fuel consumed is almost real time so it would be a good tool IF IT CORRELATED TO MILES DRIVEN.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gasoline Purchases Plummeting: Another Recession Indicator?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/882471/comments?source=feed#comment-9787831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9787831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[1) Lakshman is not a fringe voice - unless one considers a fringe being somebody that does not share your view.<br/>2) since my post disputed views that gasoline usage is a &quot;good&quot; economic indicator, i did not list the pundits.  this is not a personal thing to me, and a roll-call just makes this personal.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:10:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[1) Lakshman is not a fringe voice - unless one considers a fringe being somebody that does not share your view.<br/>2) since my post disputed views that gasoline usage is a &quot;good&quot; economic indicator, i did not list the pundits.  this is not a personal thing to me, and a roll-call just makes this personal.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
