Seeking Alpha

friend » Comments » UDN

  • Historic Financial Collapse Underway? [View article]
    The " learned " author suggested that Fannie / Freddie due to worth zero dollar while the US dollar should slide .

    The author , impressed me that salvaging Fannie / Freddie , the two government sponsored entities ( GSEs ) is like a " crime " .

    I heard one said that the recent foreclosures stem from two sources :

    1 ) the subprimes alleged to be fraud related ; someone organized to inflat property values by fraudulent appraisals and then mortgaged same to banks under the names of individuals with poor credit ratings ; the walking away would reap good profits for the organized criminals while leaving the banks with huge expenses and over valued properties .

    2 ) the severe drop in price of the financials since October , 2007 have left traditional investors broke and unable to make mortgage payments . Foreclosures thus extended to the real people .

    The " naked " short sellers intensified the damages on the economy .

    Judging from the history of loss incurred by Citigroup (C) , the subprime issue can be speculated as over or almost over ; loss from over 10B in the 4th Q , 2007 to the 2.5B in the 2nd Q , 2008 .

    The main hurdle now is the foreclures inflicted with the traditional investors or the good guys who lost all by confronting the unreasonably sharp drops in bank prices since October , 2007 .

    Say , Regional Finance (RF) , a profitable regional banking network which has little or no exposure to the subprime , went down from $ 23 to $ 7 from April to July or in just three months .

    Oh , RF has about 1.5% non performing assets (NFA) which are lands good for home construction purposes .

    The real estate maxim tells us that land by nature , appreciates in value . Such NFA is in fact valuable asset to the bank and the same leaps when the real estate market becomes normal .

    Investing into the future and thereby invest in financials .

    When financials go back up to a reasonable level , the good guys would have their savings back to update their mortgage payments .

    As a result , foreclosures would be reduced and the real estate market would be back to its normal functioning .

    Some article indicated that Fennie / Freddie were told by the US government to loosen up their policy in accepting mortgages at the time when the subprime problem had surfaced while banks then generally raised their standards .

    Such " startegy " was an attempt by the US government to boost up the real estate market at the time .

    That attempt failed for the loose rules would naturally , invite more fraudulent subprimes .

    Fannie / Freddie ended up with mortgages that they would not accept under their own policy .

    On viewing the year 2001 / 2002 downturn , Fannie / Freddie flared better than or comparable to strong pretigeous banks like Bank of America .

    Fannie / Freddie have proven themselves to be effective and profitable when being allowed to use their own standards in assessing mortgage applications .

    Even being handicapped , the combined loss to date for the two GSEs is about 10B which is about the same as what Citigroup has lost in its 4th Q , 2007 .

    Such quantity of loss is obviously manageable under today's standard .

    Freddie's CEO has repeatedly told the media that their retained earnings are sufficient to finance the GSE through this crisis .

    The shoring up by the US government is more for gaining back public confidence since half of the US mortgages are guarenteed or owned by the two GSEs .

    Yes , substandard policy attracts frauds and eventual mortgage failures .

    Published articles indicated that the substandards were used by subsidaries of investment banks and not regional banks .

    The two GSEs straddled into these substandards reluctantly on a demand by the government to salvage the real estate market .

    One would trust that the two GSEs would be more than happy when being allowed to go back to their own lending practice proven to be effective and profitable .

    The " learned " author accepts that the economy would completely collapsed should the two GSEs fail .

    The shoring up of the two GSEs would avoid such collapse .

    The author however , suggested that a complete collapse in economy would best serve the US people as oppose to the backers' claim that the US people would benefit when the two GSEs or economy being uplifted .

    People do have difference in opinions .



    Jul 20 09:41 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Dollar Falls to Record Low Over Fannie and Freddie [View article]
    USA is losing severely in a financial attack .

    It is true that there is the subprime problem .

    Short sellers pull down financials would only fuel the vicious cycle that spiral the economy from bad to worst .

    Sure , the short sellers are strong and concerted .

    All financials could go down more than 5% or even 10% in one or two hours time .

    The concerted strength can only be released by some conspired power .

    Such conspiracy is a crime .

    As well , it certainly would successfully push a panic button to the general investors who may only want a quiet life when retired from long years of work .

    Cutting the equity of bank stock by pulling down their prices would of course put the bank in a credit crunch .

    The short sellers are fed in expense of the bank's equity .

    The only way to savage this economy is to buy against the short sellers so that the financial equity or pricing can be raised to a reasonable level .

    Fannie / Freddie ( FNM / FRE ) are the stocks of most strategic importance .

    Should a strong defender step in to buy against the short seller so that the pricing can be maintained at a reasonable level .

    The whole financial market would be at the start to be stablized .

    FNM / FRE would need the equity or reasonable pricing in order to facilitate the passing of the mortgage rescue law .

    The mortgage rescue plan would effectively stablize the housing market on a permenant basis .

    I knew for the fact that some government encountered a similar financial cresis with the short sellers .

    The same government buy against the short seller to maintain a reasonable price level , by using a trust funds being set up with the taxpayers' money .

    The trust funds then owned a pile of the stock purchased from the open market without diluting the corporation at issue .

    The stock price then grow back to normal and the trust funds made huge money for the taxpayers .

    The short sellers lost a huge chunk of money and disappeared .

    The bad news used by the short sellers disappeared as well .

    Can the bulk of people , general investors and public inclusive , win this financial war against a small group but organized short sellers ?





    Jul 15 11:31 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on UDN by friend
Comments by Ticker
friend's
Comments Stats
16 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )