Microsoft vs. Open Source: Differences Explained by the Real World [View article]
he won't reply because he is in the tank for Microsoft and Ibm
On Nov 25 04:10 PM User 299351 wrote:
> Dennis, you say: "IBM and other legacy software suppliers are the > leaders in open source". > Well, this is quite new for me. IBM makes $20B+ (agree this is substantial!) > in pure commercial software revenue, including Websphere, Rational, > Lotus, DB2 and Tivoli (and many other hidden brands acquired an intergrated > into the 5 SW brands) and of course the Mainframe SW. Where is Open > Source here? Is any of these brands Open Source? that will certainly > be great news to all of us. Can you please qualify what do you mean > by "IBM is a leader in Open Source Software", beside the marketing > hype ?
Microsoft vs. Open Source: Differences Explained by the Real World [View article]
On Nov 25 04:10 PM User 299351 wrote:
> Dennis, you say: "IBM and other legacy software suppliers are the
> leaders in open source".
> Well, this is quite new for me. IBM makes $20B+ (agree this is substantial!)
> in pure commercial software revenue, including Websphere, Rational,
> Lotus, DB2 and Tivoli (and many other hidden brands acquired an intergrated
> into the 5 SW brands) and of course the Mainframe SW. Where is Open
> Source here? Is any of these brands Open Source? that will certainly
> be great news to all of us. Can you please qualify what do you mean
> by "IBM is a leader in Open Source Software", beside the marketing
> hype ?