Natural Gas ETF: Nowhere to Go but Up, Yet It Keeps Going Down [View article]
The big question is.... how forward looking IS the market on these issues...that all that you said is already priced in to the incredible decline?????
On Jul 09 10:36 AM skrangeo wrote:
> here's the deal with natural gas (and the reason I've made money > buying/selling puts on UNG) > > With the boom in prices came a boom in drilling. And, at the higher > prices, the exploration plays like the Haynesville were very economic. > And along with the drilling came a soaring production increase. And > along with everything else came a HUGE drive up in prices for acreage > (especially exploration acreage, up from $2k an acre a couple of > years ago to around $30k an acre in the hottest areas). > > As production soared, and demand dropped (economic downturn, mild > weather), oversupply has become a HUGE issue. The storage of natural > gas has just literally smashed old records. There is ~30% more natural > gas in storage right now than the past 5 year average. Simple economics, > supply >>>> demand = huge drop in prices. > > As prices have dropped, many areas have become uneconomic. It’s pretty > widely known that the breakeven economics for the Barnett is around > $5 - $5.50/mcf. Right now, it is around $3.45/mcf. Thus, drilling > programs have been slashed all over. The rig count is down 55% since > October. > > Well, you would think that the major drop in rigs would lower production > and help the situation. Unfortunately, here is the kicker. These > new shale plays, being drilled up through the use of horizontal wells, > are bringing on MONSTER wells. A vertical well in an “average” formation > might come on at 1 mmcfd. These new Haynesville wells are coming > on at 15-25 mmcfd. So, one new Haynesville well basically take the > place of 15 “average” wells. So while the rig count has dropped drastically, > the wells coming online right now are so much stronger that production > hasn’t hardly been affected. > > If that weren’t bad enough, here is kicker #2: most of that high > $$$$ acreage was exploration acreage (meaning, no production to hold > the leases yet). And, most of those leases were 2 year leases. Now, > if you take a section (640 acres), you only need 1 well producing > on that lease to hold it. And, at 40 acre spacing, there is the potential > per section for 640 / 40 = 16 drill locations. Now, at $30k/acre > and 640 acres in a section, you already have $19 million in sunk > costs per section. You have literally hundreds of millions (billions?) > of dollars tied up in non-producing acreage with a shortly expiring > time clock. If they don’t get at least one well drilled and online > to hold the lease, they risk losing all of that sunk money. > > So, even if wells are uneconomic now, they are still drilling to > get one well per section online to hold the lease. This allows them > to have that backlog of the remaining 15 locations so that when prices > recover, they have access to those reserves. They are willing to > drill an uneconomic well today so that they don’t lose the lease > that they have already spent tons of money on. And, since they have > to keep drilling for this reason, it just continues to add to the > current oversupply (regardless of prices). > > Having said all of that, we are going to start seeing physical limitations > on natural gas storage (you can’t cram 6 lbs of shit into a 5 lb > bag). There is already more natural gas in storage in the central > region than at the peak of last year (2nd week of November). And, > we still have 3.5 months of storage to go! Yikes! Due to this, the > price is going to get driven down sharply because there will be nowhere > for the natural gas to go. Once natural gas prices get driven down > into the low $2s, companies WILL start shutting in production and > dropping even MORE rigs. This well help the oversupply get worked > off, and only THEN will prices start to turn upwards.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedNatural Gas ETF: Nowhere to Go but Up, Yet It Keeps Going Down [View article]
On Jul 09 10:36 AM skrangeo wrote:
> here's the deal with natural gas (and the reason I've made money
> buying/selling puts on UNG)
>
> With the boom in prices came a boom in drilling. And, at the higher
> prices, the exploration plays like the Haynesville were very economic.
> And along with the drilling came a soaring production increase. And
> along with everything else came a HUGE drive up in prices for acreage
> (especially exploration acreage, up from $2k an acre a couple of
> years ago to around $30k an acre in the hottest areas).
>
> As production soared, and demand dropped (economic downturn, mild
> weather), oversupply has become a HUGE issue. The storage of natural
> gas has just literally smashed old records. There is ~30% more natural
> gas in storage right now than the past 5 year average. Simple economics,
> supply >>>> demand = huge drop in prices.
>
> As prices have dropped, many areas have become uneconomic. It’s pretty
> widely known that the breakeven economics for the Barnett is around
> $5 - $5.50/mcf. Right now, it is around $3.45/mcf. Thus, drilling
> programs have been slashed all over. The rig count is down 55% since
> October.
>
> Well, you would think that the major drop in rigs would lower production
> and help the situation. Unfortunately, here is the kicker. These
> new shale plays, being drilled up through the use of horizontal wells,
> are bringing on MONSTER wells. A vertical well in an “average” formation
> might come on at 1 mmcfd. These new Haynesville wells are coming
> on at 15-25 mmcfd. So, one new Haynesville well basically take the
> place of 15 “average” wells. So while the rig count has dropped drastically,
> the wells coming online right now are so much stronger that production
> hasn’t hardly been affected.
>
> If that weren’t bad enough, here is kicker #2: most of that high
> $$$$ acreage was exploration acreage (meaning, no production to hold
> the leases yet). And, most of those leases were 2 year leases. Now,
> if you take a section (640 acres), you only need 1 well producing
> on that lease to hold it. And, at 40 acre spacing, there is the potential
> per section for 640 / 40 = 16 drill locations. Now, at $30k/acre
> and 640 acres in a section, you already have $19 million in sunk
> costs per section. You have literally hundreds of millions (billions?)
> of dollars tied up in non-producing acreage with a shortly expiring
> time clock. If they don’t get at least one well drilled and online
> to hold the lease, they risk losing all of that sunk money.
>
> So, even if wells are uneconomic now, they are still drilling to
> get one well per section online to hold the lease. This allows them
> to have that backlog of the remaining 15 locations so that when prices
> recover, they have access to those reserves. They are willing to
> drill an uneconomic well today so that they don’t lose the lease
> that they have already spent tons of money on. And, since they have
> to keep drilling for this reason, it just continues to add to the
> current oversupply (regardless of prices).
>
> Having said all of that, we are going to start seeing physical limitations
> on natural gas storage (you can’t cram 6 lbs of shit into a 5 lb
> bag). There is already more natural gas in storage in the central
> region than at the peak of last year (2nd week of November). And,
> we still have 3.5 months of storage to go! Yikes! Due to this, the
> price is going to get driven down sharply because there will be nowhere
> for the natural gas to go. Once natural gas prices get driven down
> into the low $2s, companies WILL start shutting in production and
> dropping even MORE rigs. This well help the oversupply get worked
> off, and only THEN will prices start to turn upwards.
Why I'm Committed to the UltraShort Financials ETF [View article]