Seeking Alpha

creativforce » Comments » SGPEF.PK

  • A Very Smart Plan for Federal Smart Grid Grants [View article]
    Can you think of another industry where walking door to door to read an analog meter would be considered a valuable use of an employee's time?
    Apr 21 13:28 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • A Very Smart Plan for Federal Smart Grid Grants [View article]
    Ok, if I am the president of a regional power conglomerate like NIPSCO in northern Indiana (I call him Mr. Burns). I have thousands of workers trained to perform repetitive tasks maintaining coal-fired power plants and analog equipment. The more energy my customers use, the more money I make. My customers are billed monthly. I have no competitors. My customers have no choice but to pay me. The only rights my customers have come through consumer protection groups who lobby the state government when they set my profit margins. As the president of this company I can only make more profit by encouraging consumption. I do this by helping to fund more urban sprawl and by discounting my prices to manufacturers (encouraging their wastefulness.)

    What possible motive do I have for buying efficient battery storage for reliable, green, renewable, or digital technology?

    I see a "build it and they will come" mentality at work here. The US government can give money to great ideas until it hurts. But just because a much better technology exists doesn't mean it will be purchased and used.

    I see great inventions begging for a market, not a market begging for great inventions.

    The US could spend nothing and force Mr. Burns to meet certain federally mandated standards (like the state government in CA has done). If Burns can't make money the old way, he will find a new way. In CA, PG&E and other local monopolies are scrambling to buy renewable energy because the law says they must.

    Carbon trading could also create a big market for batteries and renewables.

    The government could also rewrite laws to make distributed generation profitable for home owners and small businesses. That would be the most efficient, smart, safe and reliable way to solve the energy problem. And eventually it would make Mr. Burns obsolete. 100 million energy producers is better than a few hundred (plus it would create a dramatically more dynamic market for these products).

    Large scale energy production and transmission is terribly wasteful. Those enormous smoke stacks and cooling towers aren't just "blowing smoke" they are wasting 25% of the energy they produce. Those crackling transmission lines aren't just making noise, they are wasting 30% of the energy that flows through them.

    You can water and fertilize a seed all you want, but it won't grow in the winter. The government needs to change the season and the seeds will grow. Energy storage stocks would be the hottest thing since GOOG, if the government would focus their efforts on developing a market rather than on the financial problems within these wonderful small companies.

    Hopefully the EPA's recent decision to regulate CO2 will force Mr. Burns to buy these products. Incentive should lead invention, because in the morning when we Americans have a problem we get to work and fix it. The way it is now, Mr. Burns has no problems.

    Apr 21 12:17 pm |Rating: +8 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Smart Grid's Enabler - Alternative Energy Storage [View article]
    Again a great article! But I wonder if all this energy investment money is going to disappear along with the TARP money. I am getting fed up waiting for the smart grid to start happening. I've been reading about the need for it since the 80's and have lost money every time I have tried to invest in it. I remember a Buckminster Fuller lecture I attended in '82 where he predicted that the smart grid would end the cold war because solar power would flow around a global grid from countries in daylight to countries in darkness.

    The trouble as I see it is the Homer Simpson effect. Once your home plugs into the grid, they have you by the short hairs for life. Homer gets a paycheck no matter how much he charges, no matter how short sighted he is, and no matter how much he screws up. If we could deregulate energy like we did the phone companies, then cool stuff would start happening. If AXPW sold their batteries at Home Depot, I'd buy a windmill and enough batteries to disconnect. The off-grid battery systems available today are dangerous, require constant maintenance and have very short life spans. But the incredible life span of these batteries you have written about here make it seem like you could count on them for decades like you do your furnace. If they could develop a turn-key home energy system for under $30,000, it would be the biggest revolution since the PC.

    I like Fuller's utopian dream of sharing free energy, but since that ain't gonna happen, I want my own.
    Feb 10 11:23 am |Rating: +5 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Alternative Energy Storage Is an Investment Tsunami [View article]
    When we average americans have a problem we get up in the morning and fix it. My "quaint" point is that the only thing stopping me and millions of other average americans from junking our engines is the lack of an over the counter battery that provides range, price, and weight that will fit in our Corollas. This isn't extravagent arrogance. Just look at all the backyard rebels at evalbum.com/. This rebellion has gone from one or two "nuts" to thousands in the last year. And I believe it would jump from a few thousand to a few million if we could buy conversion kits with NIMH or Firefly batteries at Pep Boys. Either of these technologies would give us 500 pound battery packs coupled with a 75 pound motor (about the same weight as the engine, gas tank, and exhaust system we would be tossing) delivering highway speeds and a range of about 50 miles. That's all we need to get to work and back. It's not a sexy market like Tesla, but what's the profit on a million 500 lb battery packs?
    Dec 01 14:02 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Alternative Energy Storage Is an Investment Tsunami [View article]
    As usual, great info John! All we need for a PEV revolution is a lead acid battery that weighs half as much as current technology like the one PWTC owns the patent on and stopped manufacturing why?? NIMH would work if Cobasys was ever serious about marketing it (Chevron needs to wake up or die). Every family today has 2 cars, only one needs to be electric for commuting to make a fundamental difference. My wife and I both own used Corollas for commuting and the minivan stays in the driveway for weekends. I would gladly turn the Corollas into EVs or Poulsen hybrids If I could get a battery.

    By the way, has everybody seen this at Greencarcongress?

    Michelin to Commercialize Electric Active Wheel Technology

    1 December 2008

    Michelin’s Active Wheel integrates brake disk, electric motor and suspension motor.

    Michelin’s Active Wheel, an in-wheel system comprising a brake, 30 kW (40 hp) electric traction motor and electric suspension motor system, will be used in the Heuliez-produced WILL electric vehicle (battery or fuel cell), due to be available to fleet owners in 2010. The WILL grew out of a concept developed by Heuliez and Michelin and features networked services innovated by Orange.
    Dec 01 11:37 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on SGPEF.PK by creativforce
Comments by Ticker
creativforce's
Comments Stats
49 comments
Rating: 41 (92 - 51 )