Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
ginchinchili: Well put (and I would give you more than one thumbs up if I could)! You are free to look at my e-trading long portfolio right here on Seeking Alpha (I've yet to add Huntington Bank (HBAN) of which I acquired a few shares today. I believe that list contains fundamentally sound stocks, with exception to the risky, high upside biotech stocks; many are way up from where I bought them. All of them I've studied thoroughly, and I'm on their corporate e-mail lists. I would never post anything about any stock I haven't studied with DD, unless it's a cool technology that I believe this forum should be made aware; part of a team effort.
I don't list, though, my day trades, which usually are a blend of banks, miners, shippers, and of course, ETFs. Today, for instance I'm riding Excelon Shipping (EXM).
As for the talking heads, I have banned myself from watching Cramer--insert expletive, as he has cost me way too much money--and more and more am tuning out CNBC all together. Just too much noise and outrageous opinions that I used to find intriguing, even humorous, but now I find to be a waste of precious time.
I will stand firmly, though, with my rant about Goldman Sachs.
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
ginchinchili: Well put! You are free to look at my e-trading long portfolio right here on Seeking Alpha. I believe the fundamentals for each company listed are pretty sound (I've yet to add Huntington Bank, some of which I aquired today). I don't, though, list my day trades, which usaully are a blend of shipping stocks, banks, mining stocks, and of course, ETFs.
As for the talking heads, I've banned myself watching Cramer. In fact, more and more I am tuning out CNBC all together.
My musings above are the results of studying this market--and it's history--60 to 70 hours a week for about a year and a half.
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
All this makes me wonder about how in advance the Goldman boyz know this already. Is there any transparency of this, and how they have traded this ARRA announcement?
Cracks me up when you say: "Like many in Washington I don't read legislation before it has passed."
The more I learn, the more I feel that any investment is off kiltered; that some entity--some analyst--will prescribe advice that I should let go--take profits--of my shares of stocks that are way up.
The amazing part of all of this is that no time ever again in my lifetime will there be a better time to be involved in the stock market. But, there are so many shananigins going on, so much manipulation, that it's frightening in how I can compete.
Investing common sense says join the club. But I'm beginning to believe that nothing makes sense. Yet, sentiment does make sense. This whole market thing right now is more about hype than fundamentals. I will stick to my premise that going long is the best way to improve one's portfolio, for right now, and that now is only weeks away, or months away from aborting, once again. Every major recession model I've read about states that this is another head fake rally. The question is when to yet again get out and go to cash. But, heck, I'm riding with the flow, as false pretense as I see it is.
The good part right now is how things are looking up, temporarily, of course. The crazy part is to figure when the next pull back Part Two is going to occur.
Of course, Goldman Sachs already knows this, has "planned" this, as history has already proven.
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
John: Haven't had time to peruse the usual banter here John, because tonight I have been studying the next bubble that Goldman Sachs is planning: Cap and Trade.
I won't--okay I will editorialize about my feelings of how GSK has repeatedly raped the world of trillions of dollars, and now is planning to do it again with (knee) Cap and Trade, or how the Obama administration is rife with Goldmanites, or how Sachs gave his campaign nearly a million in contributions, or how GSK is going to dominate the soon-to-be carbon credit commodity bubble, ect., ect., ect....
What I would like to gather are your thoughts of how batteries will be affected by what likely will be approved sometime this fall.
My guess is that Cap and Trade is a positive for batteries, and it better be, because what I've read tonight means the electric bill will go up by anywhere from $1500 to $3000 annually. Just hoping my batt stocks offset that some.
So, what do you think?
####
It seems Axion and Exide are on the move, likely due to the Cash for Clunkers. I sit on the fence on this one, as those two stocks are benefitting from this policy. However, what I don't like, or maybe want to know more about, is how in the hell can Ford be advertising government rebates of $3500 or $4500 for the purchase of a gas guzzling F150?
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
I'm putting out some cookies and eggnog before the fireplace.
In the wee morn I going to the stock market casino ready to bet hard on the Energy Storage Sector.
Thanks for the tip, John!
Do you like fruitcake?
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
I don't list, though, my day trades, which usually are a blend of banks, miners, shippers, and of course, ETFs. Today, for instance I'm riding Excelon Shipping (EXM).
As for the talking heads, I have banned myself from watching Cramer--insert expletive, as he has cost me way too much money--and more and more am tuning out CNBC all together. Just too much noise and outrageous opinions that I used to find intriguing, even humorous, but now I find to be a waste of precious time.
I will stand firmly, though, with my rant about Goldman Sachs.
Thanks for the advice and comment!
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
As for the talking heads, I've banned myself watching Cramer. In fact, more and more I am tuning out CNBC all together.
My musings above are the results of studying this market--and it's history--60 to 70 hours a week for about a year and a half.
Thanks for the comment!
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
Cracks me up when you say: "Like many in Washington I don't read legislation before it has passed."
The more I learn, the more I feel that any investment is off kiltered; that some entity--some analyst--will prescribe advice that I should let go--take profits--of my shares of stocks that are way up.
The amazing part of all of this is that no time ever again in my lifetime will there be a better time to be involved in the stock market. But, there are so many shananigins going on, so much manipulation, that it's frightening in how I can compete.
Investing common sense says join the club. But I'm beginning to believe that nothing makes sense. Yet, sentiment does make sense. This whole market thing right now is more about hype than fundamentals. I will stick to my premise that going long is the best way to improve one's portfolio, for right now, and that now is only weeks away, or months away from aborting, once again. Every major recession model I've read about states that this is another head fake rally. The question is when to yet again get out and go to cash. But, heck, I'm riding with the flow, as false pretense as I see it is.
The good part right now is how things are looking up, temporarily, of course. The crazy part is to figure when the next pull back Part Two is going to occur.
Of course, Goldman Sachs already knows this, has "planned" this, as history has already proven.
Alternative Energy Storage: Cheap Continues to Outperform Cool [View article]
I won't--okay I will editorialize about my feelings of how GSK has repeatedly raped the world of trillions of dollars, and now is planning to do it again with (knee) Cap and Trade, or how the Obama administration is rife with Goldmanites, or how Sachs gave his campaign nearly a million in contributions, or how GSK is going to dominate the soon-to-be carbon credit commodity bubble, ect., ect., ect....
What I would like to gather are your thoughts of how batteries will be affected by what likely will be approved sometime this fall.
My guess is that Cap and Trade is a positive for batteries, and it better be, because what I've read tonight means the electric bill will go up by anywhere from $1500 to $3000 annually. Just hoping my batt stocks offset that some.
So, what do you think?
####
It seems Axion and Exide are on the move, likely due to the Cash for Clunkers. I sit on the fence on this one, as those two stocks are benefitting from this policy. However, what I don't like, or maybe want to know more about, is how in the hell can Ford be advertising government rebates of $3500 or $4500 for the purchase of a gas guzzling F150?