The Fed: Sending Investors to the Slaughter? [View article]
so please explain to me how you defend the socialism of large corporations. why are GS, AIG, CITI, BOA being bailed out? isnt this socialism? when do corporations take responsibility for their actions?
On Nov 06 12:33 PM socrateaz wrote:
> Do you understand that socialists are basically me people? They > want to have what others have without puting out the effort to get > it. They call people who acheive to get ahead greedy while they > want others to supply their wants with little effort. They hide > behind fairness as a goal. But when you look at socialist leaders. > You will see them support some to a greater degree than others. > For Socialists to exist they need to blame hardships on unfairness > of others. When enough become true socialist a true failed economy > will emerge. All expecting the other to support them. Courts often > push socialism because they really believe fairness is in equality. > And equality is in redistribution because those who are 20% responsible > and have the funds should be held 500% responsible for what happens > to those 80% responsible but with no funds. Court logic! Socialism > is making others responsible for the bad things that happen to me > while taking credit for anything that appears to be my success! > Just need to understand the logic to understand the actions taken
-
so please explain to me how you defend the socialism of large corporations. why are GS, AIG, CITI, BOA being bailed out? isnt this socialism? when do corporations take responsibility for their actions?
Nov 06 13:21 pm
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by commoinsense1211 »The Fed: Sending Investors to the Slaughter? [View article]
On Nov 06 12:33 PM socrateaz wrote:
> Do you understand that socialists are basically me people? They
> want to have what others have without puting out the effort to get
> it. They call people who acheive to get ahead greedy while they
> want others to supply their wants with little effort. They hide
> behind fairness as a goal. But when you look at socialist leaders.
> You will see them support some to a greater degree than others.
> For Socialists to exist they need to blame hardships on unfairness
> of others. When enough become true socialist a true failed economy
> will emerge. All expecting the other to support them. Courts often
> push socialism because they really believe fairness is in equality.
> And equality is in redistribution because those who are 20% responsible
> and have the funds should be held 500% responsible for what happens
> to those 80% responsible but with no funds. Court logic! Socialism
> is making others responsible for the bad things that happen to me
> while taking credit for anything that appears to be my success!
> Just need to understand the logic to understand the actions taken