Seeking Alpha

boxerconan » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • Apple SEC Investigation: Rotten to Core [View article]
    Good article.
    SEC should be investigating those who have been talking to media as "unnamed source". I could pick up a phone and call Bloomberg and tell whatever because "I monitor AAPL closely".

    Jan 26 09:41 am |Rating: +5 0 |Link to Comment
  • Winners and Losers in Today's Market [View article]
    Clueless.....

    Do you know about AAPL's cash position?
    Have you seen AAPL's non-GAAP accounting which showed 40% yoy growth?




    Jan 25 16:24 pm |Rating: 0 -3 |Link to Comment
  • Tech Bellwethers: Earnings Scorecard [View article]
    You clearly omitted that AAPL beat by 28%.
    Isn't it encouraging?
    Plus AAPL showed over 40% of growth in non-GAAP base.
    Looks like only negative results were emphasized.


    Jan 24 11:54 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • A Remedy for Short Selling Manipulation [View article]
    Thanks....great article.
    Please send your opinion to Obama Transition Team...
    I think they are working on SEC restructuring now.
    They have to announce the replacement of Cox as soon as possible.



    Dec 05 10:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Replacing P/E in Valuing Apple Stock [View article]
    Thanks....Great article.

    we need more of such discussion. I wonder if AAPL can provide us with pro-forma income statements not applying "subscription accounting". I have seen a company with LIFO accounting providing income statements based on FIFO so that investors can see more normalized financial performance. Or companies with international exposure provides figures assuming there was no currency fluctuation.

    Is it not allowed by SEC? They are not doing it because AAPL is not investor friendly? Plus creating such income statement model is quite simple for analysts. Only handful of analysts are looking at the growth in free cashflow.

    I know it may be an waste of time, but I am going to request AAPL IR to look into it.

    The problem is that only investors with accounting background, smart fund managers and analysts would look at AAPL's cashflow. Traders don't care....Quants will only look at AAPL's multiples. That is why AAPL's price is suffering.

    I saw S&P's analyst downgraded AAPL recently....he was still talking about EPS. I could not believe it. I partially blame AAPL's investor unfriendliness though.
    Jul 31 10:44 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Worth More than Steve Jobs [View article]
    Thanks. I agree with your article. I love AAPL's products and fundamentals, but I do not appreciate the management's disrespectful attitude towards investors as seen yesterday's CC. I consider it is an added risk factor. I will keep my current position but I am not adding on this dip.
    Jul 22 10:17 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
boxerconan's
Comments Stats
6 comments
Rating: 4 (7 - 3 )