<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>gmmpa's Comments</title>
    <description>gmmpa's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/2323881/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Intel (INTC) is reportedly encountering difficulty in signing up programming deals for its upcoming online TV service, with major media companies such as Disney (DIS), Time Warner (TWX), Viacom (VIA), News Corp (NWS) and Comcast (CMCSA) yet to sign on. Pressure from cable TV providers such as Time Warner (TWC) is one reason, as is a fear of damaging the current lucrative ecosystem that the content and service providers enjoy.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1084332?source=feed#comment-19970912</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19970912</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[History is full of industries that try to protect their monopolies.  It is only a matter of time.  The market always wins if the government stays out of the business.  The cost of cable TV is getting higher and is much higher than it needs to be for the consumer.  They will eventually realize this and vote with their pocket books and their feet.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:43:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[History is full of industries that try to protect their monopolies.  It is only a matter of time.  The market always wins if the government stays out of the business.  The cost of cable TV is getting higher and is much higher than it needs to be for the consumer.  They will eventually realize this and vote with their pocket books and their feet.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon (AMZN) -1.9% and eBay (EBAY) -2%, following markets lower, after ChannelAdvisor reports same-store-sales growth declines for clients relying on the companies in May. Amazon's growth rate fell to 25.8% (its lowest over the last 12 months) from 30.6% in April, and eBay's fell to 16% from 20.5% (auctions -18%, fixed-price +16%, Motors +30%). The numbers also aren't great for Google (GOOG), which is seeing rising e-commerce ad competition and has been tweaking its strategy: sales from search ads -0.8%, and comparison shopping (e.g. Google Shopping) +0.3%. comScore puts total U.S. e-commerce growth in the 14%-15% range.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1076892?source=feed#comment-19869322</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19869322</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why should we be surprised?  These results are a sign of a very weak economy propped up and awash in cheap money and misguided monetary policy.  There is no real GDP growth dispute what is reported in the News.  Unemployment is north of 15% not 7.5% as the government would have us believe. Real business and consumer taxes are killing growth.   We all know this and still we look at these accounting results and try to make good investment decisions.  It is all a waste of time.<br/><br/>I guess the NSA will pass this comment on to the IRS.  I already hear a knock at my front door.  Dispute this we must stay in the game.  It is the only one we have.  I still like Google more than Amazon and Ebay which is really mostly retail in nature.  Sooner or later the government will run out of other people's money, policies will change and common sense will make a comeback.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:26:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why should we be surprised?  These results are a sign of a very weak economy propped up and awash in cheap money and misguided monetary policy.  There is no real GDP growth dispute what is reported in the News.  Unemployment is north of 15% not 7.5% as the government would have us believe. Real business and consumer taxes are killing growth.   We all know this and still we look at these accounting results and try to make good investment decisions.  It is all a waste of time.<br/><br/>I guess the NSA will pass this comment on to the IRS.  I already hear a knock at my front door.  Dispute this we must stay in the game.  It is the only one we have.  I still like Google more than Amazon and Ebay which is really mostly retail in nature.  Sooner or later the government will run out of other people's money, policies will change and common sense will make a comeback.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>YouTube's (GOOG) mobile ad sales have tripled over the last 6 months and about a quarter of its 1B users now watch videos on handheld devices, boasts sales VP Lucas Watson. The yanking of an ad-free YouTube app from iOS 6, and Google's subsequent release of an ad-featuring iOS app, likely have much to do with the jump. But so does soaring traffic: Nielsen estimates at least 70M U.S. smartphone users accessed YouTube apps in March, +42% Y/Y; international growth is probably higher. Last fall, Nomura estimated YouTube, whose short-form material is more mobile-friendly than Netflix and Hulu's fare, will yield $3.2B in 2013 revenue. Wedge Partners sees 20%-25% of YouTube's ad sales now coming from mobile.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1069511?source=feed#comment-19738252</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19738252</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I always thought YouTube was a highly under valued app for Google.  It is a wealth of information and a great source of product reviews which do motivate me to purchase items, however I don't believe that Google gains a commission on the resulting purchases.  Never the less it is as important to me as the search function.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I always thought YouTube was a highly under valued app for Google.  It is a wealth of information and a great source of product reviews which do motivate me to purchase items, however I don't believe that Google gains a commission on the resulting purchases.  Never the less it is as important to me as the search function.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motorola (GOOG) intends to introduce a new smartphone called the Moto X in October as it seeks to pull itself back into the top tier of mobile device makers. The handset will be made by Flextronics (FLEX) at a plant in Texas that will employ 2,000 people by August. The Moto X will incorporate two processors to conserve battery life, and include sensors to help it better understand the needs of the user.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1053641?source=feed#comment-19416381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19416381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not sure what is article is reporting.  It telling you nothing about the Moto X except that it has two processors that uses less power.  The link to smartphone takes you to Bloomberg TV which promotes the Samsung galaxy 4 over the latest iphone release.<br/><br/>The only take way here is that smartphone technology sector is evolving rapidly and is very competitive.  No one has a clue where it is going.<br/><br/>Flextronics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flex' title='Flextronics International Ltd.'>FLEX</a>) stock link shows a stock pop presumably on the potential for increased sales of the MOTO X whose features are not reported nor compared to the galaxy 4 or the iphone. <br/><br/>So... This is just a Google press release of the MOTO X.   <br/><br/><br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 09:53:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not sure what is article is reporting.  It telling you nothing about the Moto X except that it has two processors that uses less power.  The link to smartphone takes you to Bloomberg TV which promotes the Samsung galaxy 4 over the latest iphone release.<br/><br/>The only take way here is that smartphone technology sector is evolving rapidly and is very competitive.  No one has a clue where it is going.<br/><br/>Flextronics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flex' title='Flextronics International Ltd.'>FLEX</a>) stock link shows a stock pop presumably on the potential for increased sales of the MOTO X whose features are not reported nor compared to the galaxy 4 or the iphone. <br/><br/>So... This is just a Google press release of the MOTO X.   <br/><br/><br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ford (F) says it will close its plants in Australia in 2016 as a strong aussie and high labor costs weigh heavily on the Australian manufacturing sector's ability to compete with cheap imports. The closures are expected to result in the loss of some 1,200 jobs.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1042091?source=feed#comment-19149081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19149081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry to read it is not just the USA that has lost its way heading toward the socialism dark side.  Hopefully it will be temporary and free world will find its way back to a better socioeconomic place.  Socialism always fails everywhere it was tried.  It is just a matter of time.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:37:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry to read it is not just the USA that has lost its way heading toward the socialism dark side.  Hopefully it will be temporary and free world will find its way back to a better socioeconomic place.  Socialism always fails everywhere it was tried.  It is just a matter of time.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In what could be a win for PayPal (EBAY), Google (GOOG) is shutting down Checkout in 6 months to focus its online payments efforts on Wallet. Though Google will still handle payment processing for developers selling on Google properties (Play, Chrome Web Store, Offers Marketplace), 3rd-party merchants using Checkout and lacking an internal processing solution will have to find an alternative. The announcement comes a week after Google announced several new Wallet features, including new developer APIs and an option to attach money to Gmail messages.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1038551?source=feed#comment-19103211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19103211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have used Ebay since its inception in the late 90s. I use PAYPAL all the time.  I was sorry to see it acquired by Ebay.  It should have gone public.  Electronic payments and electronic banking is much harder than it looks to implement securely.  PAYPAL has more experience and an established base in E commerce.  Smart phone E commerce have a ways to go before I will use it for electronic payment transactions.<br/><br/>It is good to see Google enter the space, however, I think they they should use their cash to acquire some small cap start up companies that can help them quickly gain experience in electronic banking and electronic payment security.  Companies like the European Elephant Talk Communications (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/etak' title='Elephant Talk Communications Corp.'>ETAK</a>). They should look to banks and consumers in Europe which are further along in smart phone eCommerce than in the USA.  <br/><br/>However it is in its early stages of development world wide.  It is something that should be watched but not necessarily used.   It will make cell phones truly and electronic wallet when it matures.  <br/><br/>I am long GOOG and ETAK.  Do not have a position in Ebay.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:41:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have used Ebay since its inception in the late 90s. I use PAYPAL all the time.  I was sorry to see it acquired by Ebay.  It should have gone public.  Electronic payments and electronic banking is much harder than it looks to implement securely.  PAYPAL has more experience and an established base in E commerce.  Smart phone E commerce have a ways to go before I will use it for electronic payment transactions.<br/><br/>It is good to see Google enter the space, however, I think they they should use their cash to acquire some small cap start up companies that can help them quickly gain experience in electronic banking and electronic payment security.  Companies like the European Elephant Talk Communications (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/etak' title='Elephant Talk Communications Corp.'>ETAK</a>). They should look to banks and consumers in Europe which are further along in smart phone eCommerce than in the USA.  <br/><br/>However it is in its early stages of development world wide.  It is something that should be watched but not necessarily used.   It will make cell phones truly and electronic wallet when it matures.  <br/><br/>I am long GOOG and ETAK.  Do not have a position in Ebay.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Google Worth That Much More Than Microsoft?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1392731/comments?source=feed#comment-18645761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18645761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Long term everyone over 60 will be dead.  This market has not been trading with a long term perspective.  In an inflationary economy such as this anyone of these stocks are better than cash.  <br/><br/>What is wrong with 97% in ad revenue even if your statement is true?  Regardless it is not ad revenue anyway.  It is search.  There is a big difference.  Search make Internet activity useful and more friendly.  Without it the Internet would not be the dynamic environment it is.  It cannot be pirated.  You don't have to pay for it directly.  Unlike Microsoft products it is not a once every few years purchase with new computers.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:56:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Long term everyone over 60 will be dead.  This market has not been trading with a long term perspective.  In an inflationary economy such as this anyone of these stocks are better than cash.  <br/><br/>What is wrong with 97% in ad revenue even if your statement is true?  Regardless it is not ad revenue anyway.  It is search.  There is a big difference.  Search make Internet activity useful and more friendly.  Without it the Internet would not be the dynamic environment it is.  It cannot be pirated.  You don't have to pay for it directly.  Unlike Microsoft products it is not a once every few years purchase with new computers.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Drops An Atomic Bomb On ARM's 'Abomination'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406441/comments?source=feed#comment-18528931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18528931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is about time that Intel uses its financial and intellectual assets to expand into other sectors of the consumer electronics space.  They are the 900 lb gorilla in the space and should begin to act as such.  Maybe they can do something that could move the needle beyond $27 for the stockholders.  I think the change in management was long overdue.  Perhaps Intel can become a growth company again.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 08:43:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is about time that Intel uses its financial and intellectual assets to expand into other sectors of the consumer electronics space.  They are the 900 lb gorilla in the space and should begin to act as such.  Maybe they can do something that could move the needle beyond $27 for the stockholders.  I think the change in management was long overdue.  Perhaps Intel can become a growth company again.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Google Worth That Much More Than Microsoft?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1392731/comments?source=feed#comment-18350121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18350121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a good article.  The arguments show incite into the companies' business models and are simply explained. It is even hard to argue with the conclusion based on company  fundamentals.  However, I do not like Microsoft which I owned several times in the past decades.  I haven't made any real money going long on Microsoft since the 80s.  Microsoft Trades poorly in the market. It is stuck is a trading under $35.  I do not believe that Microsoft management supports the best interests of its stockholders and consumers.  This is the reason I believe it trades that way despite all the apparent locked up value this article presents.  <br/><br/>The invisible sentiment of the stock market maybe wrong in the short term but over time it is rarely wrong.  Microsoft's management is self centered and NOT growth oriented.  I believe that Google still is a better value even at the high PE.  Market sentiment is not sure what to make of Apple's current management with the death of Steve Jobs and that is why the stock is struggling.  Apple has a certain cache and product pipeline that keeps its margins high.  The market is trying to determine if this still applies going forward.  I like Apple and owned it in the past,  but will not take a current position in it until this issue is resolved by the market.  <br/><br/>Less than a 50/50 chance is gambling. 60/40 and 90/10 is measured risk/return.  100% is insider trading.  We all like the latter but don't tell the SEC.  This is reserved for Congress and those in the shorts of government. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 09:13:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is a good article.  The arguments show incite into the companies' business models and are simply explained. It is even hard to argue with the conclusion based on company  fundamentals.  However, I do not like Microsoft which I owned several times in the past decades.  I haven't made any real money going long on Microsoft since the 80s.  Microsoft Trades poorly in the market. It is stuck is a trading under $35.  I do not believe that Microsoft management supports the best interests of its stockholders and consumers.  This is the reason I believe it trades that way despite all the apparent locked up value this article presents.  <br/><br/>The invisible sentiment of the stock market maybe wrong in the short term but over time it is rarely wrong.  Microsoft's management is self centered and NOT growth oriented.  I believe that Google still is a better value even at the high PE.  Market sentiment is not sure what to make of Apple's current management with the death of Steve Jobs and that is why the stock is struggling.  Apple has a certain cache and product pipeline that keeps its margins high.  The market is trying to determine if this still applies going forward.  I like Apple and owned it in the past,  but will not take a current position in it until this issue is resolved by the market.  <br/><br/>Less than a 50/50 chance is gambling. 60/40 and 90/10 is measured risk/return.  100% is insider trading.  We all like the latter but don't tell the SEC.  This is reserved for Congress and those in the shorts of government. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Phony Beat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1354481/comments?source=feed#comment-18211611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18211611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That doesn't exactly answer the question.  Given the assumption that both companies' forward earnings estimates remain unchanged  AAPL maybe undervalued.  On the other hand perhaps the market is discounting Apple's future earnings stream negatively.  I don't share that opinion, but I reluctant to start a new position in this market propped up by artificially low interest rates and bogus government economic statistics. <br/><br/>For now my opinion on Google is unchanged until year end.  I am long Google and have no position in Apple.  I am definitely not listening to guys with cowboy hats trying to figure out what to do with their 10 shares of Google.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:52:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That doesn't exactly answer the question.  Given the assumption that both companies' forward earnings estimates remain unchanged  AAPL maybe undervalued.  On the other hand perhaps the market is discounting Apple's future earnings stream negatively.  I don't share that opinion, but I reluctant to start a new position in this market propped up by artificially low interest rates and bogus government economic statistics. <br/><br/>For now my opinion on Google is unchanged until year end.  I am long Google and have no position in Apple.  I am definitely not listening to guys with cowboy hats trying to figure out what to do with their 10 shares of Google.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google (GOOG) spent $291M on acquisitions and asset purchases in Q1, the company discloses in its latest 10-Q. Among other things, that figure covers Google's $125M purchase of Channel Intelligence from ICE, and its acquisitions of startups DNNResearch and Talaria. The disclosure comes as Google's $12.5B purchase of Motorola Mobility looks more and more questionable, given Motorola's dismal sales and legal setbacks, and the fact Motorola's IP hasn't done much yet to halt Apple's legal war against Android OEMs (even if the market share impact has been limited).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/976231?source=feed#comment-18180261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18180261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is nothing wrong with acquisitions when a company is flush with cash. It is no different than R&amp;D spending. Microsoft did it for years before it started paying dividends. Google should have done it earlier.  They had a chance to buy twitter when it was just a start up and passed.    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:01:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is nothing wrong with acquisitions when a company is flush with cash. It is no different than R&amp;D spending. Microsoft did it for years before it started paying dividends. Google should have done it earlier.  They had a chance to buy twitter when it was just a start up and passed.    ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automobile sales in western China are expanding twice as fast as in the nation's wealthier coastal cities, according to China-based auto analysts. The development plays well into Ford's (F) strategy after the automaker invested to set up plants in the region capable of producing more than one million vehicles a year.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/973991?source=feed#comment-18157871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18157871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wonder if Ford has similar labor union issues in China that it has in America?  What is the real cost of a Ford in China?<br/><br/>I am long Ford... I am happy things look better.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:47:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wonder if Ford has similar labor union issues in China that it has in America?  What is the real cost of a Ford in China?<br/><br/>I am long Ford... I am happy things look better.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Phony Beat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1354481/comments?source=feed#comment-17943201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17943201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'll put it on the calendar to short the stock in 20 months on the earlier comment.  Thanks for the heads up.  <br/><br/>So what valuation should $10.36 quarterly in earnings have in today's potentially inflationary market?  Should I sell all my Google and buy Gold or maybe Hersey bars?  Please... give me some direction other than &quot;buy low and sell high&quot;.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:05:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'll put it on the calendar to short the stock in 20 months on the earlier comment.  Thanks for the heads up.  <br/><br/>So what valuation should $10.36 quarterly in earnings have in today's potentially inflationary market?  Should I sell all my Google and buy Gold or maybe Hersey bars?  Please... give me some direction other than &quot;buy low and sell high&quot;.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Phony Beat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1354481/comments?source=feed#comment-17840781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17840781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And why should investors listen to this guy?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:38:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And why should investors listen to this guy?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Do Amazon, Alibaba, Facebook And Mozilla Have In Common?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1349831/comments?source=feed#comment-17779291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17779291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Competition is a good thing.  It makes all companies try harder to make the end user happy.  Investors on the other hand must watch, read and research the facts separating the truth from individual opinion.  In the tech sector we must stay tuned to the changing landscape and mood of the consumer and adjust our portfolios constantly.  <br/><br/>I suppose that is what this article implies.  But then many of us already know that.  The value added here is what the players in the sector are doing.  This article could be a tad stronger here.  There is little new information on Alibaba, Facebook (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fb' title='Facebook'>FB</a>) and Mozilla's contribution to the mobile sector.  <br/><br/>Long Google. Sold my positions in Amazon and Microsoft long ago.  Never really  considered Facebook, Alibaba, Mozilla as an investment opportunity.  This article does not change my opinion going forward.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Competition is a good thing.  It makes all companies try harder to make the end user happy.  Investors on the other hand must watch, read and research the facts separating the truth from individual opinion.  In the tech sector we must stay tuned to the changing landscape and mood of the consumer and adjust our portfolios constantly.  <br/><br/>I suppose that is what this article implies.  But then many of us already know that.  The value added here is what the players in the sector are doing.  This article could be a tad stronger here.  There is little new information on Alibaba, Facebook (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fb' title='Facebook'>FB</a>) and Mozilla's contribution to the mobile sector.  <br/><br/>Long Google. Sold my positions in Amazon and Microsoft long ago.  Never really  considered Facebook, Alibaba, Mozilla as an investment opportunity.  This article does not change my opinion going forward.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No mercy has been shown to Microsoft (MSFT -4.3%) today in the wake of IDC's figures (blamed in part on Win. 8) and Goldman's downgrade. Goldman now sees the PC/tablet sales ratio falling to 59/41 in 2014, and thinks Microsoft could respond with price cuts or SG&amp;amp;A spending cuts. Nomura's Rick Sherlund wonders if a breakup or privatization is possible for Microsoft. He notes March was better than Jan. or Feb. for PC sales, but is still downbeat. "It really takes your breath away, just how bad the quarter was." Separately, Argus has downgraded Intel (INTC -2%) to Hold.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/938731?source=feed#comment-17527181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17527181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Personal computers arguably have been around since 1981.  Software was written for the hardware to make it useful to the end use.  PCs were not useful in business until networking software may it so.  PCs were marginally useful to the public end users until the movement toward graphical interfaces (GUI), the Internet and software to connect and navigate this public networks in 1995 .  <br/><br/>Through out these innovations and growth Microsoft was running to catch and buy  their way to stay in the game. Intel was was developing the hardware to enable this growth along with other hardware firms.  <br/><br/>Microsoft can be replaced.  All software companies can be replaced especially as the IT industry moves toward thin client Intranet/ Internet and Cloud technology.  As the hardware and networks get faster and more reliable software applications can be written by the end users. However, hardware companies are needed.  Intel will be a player in the semi-conductor space.  <br/><br/>I am still long INTC and have no plans to change or trade around the position.  It ranks right up there with Hersey, MacDonalds, J&amp;J.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:57:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Personal computers arguably have been around since 1981.  Software was written for the hardware to make it useful to the end use.  PCs were not useful in business until networking software may it so.  PCs were marginally useful to the public end users until the movement toward graphical interfaces (GUI), the Internet and software to connect and navigate this public networks in 1995 .  <br/><br/>Through out these innovations and growth Microsoft was running to catch and buy  their way to stay in the game. Intel was was developing the hardware to enable this growth along with other hardware firms.  <br/><br/>Microsoft can be replaced.  All software companies can be replaced especially as the IT industry moves toward thin client Intranet/ Internet and Cloud technology.  As the hardware and networks get faster and more reliable software applications can be written by the end users. However, hardware companies are needed.  Intel will be a player in the semi-conductor space.  <br/><br/>I am still long INTC and have no plans to change or trade around the position.  It ranks right up there with Hersey, MacDonalds, J&amp;J.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Screenshots of the next version of Windows 8 (MSFT), codenamed Blue, have leaked. Features include smaller live tiles, more Snap View options, and various UI tweaks meant to make the OS more touch-friendly. Separately, CNET reports Blue will feature power-saving tech meant to work with Intel's (INTC) Haswell CPUs. Intel has promised Haswell will deliver major power savings relative to Ivy Bridge, and has mandated all Haswell ultrabooks sport touchscreens. Blue is expected later this year, and reportedly is the start of a shift to an annual Windows update cycle.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/906361?source=feed#comment-16756061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16756061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Someone at Microsoft should be fired for releasing Windows 8.  Microsoft is late to the game again.  It missed the boat for Cloud computing and has jumped in with both feet to catch up by answering with Windows 8 as their Cloud computer solution.   They must like to lead from behind. <br/><br/>What the technology sector needs is a reincarnation of Steve Jobs not shallow dweebs like Gates, Ballmer, or Zuckerberg. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 03:42:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Someone at Microsoft should be fired for releasing Windows 8.  Microsoft is late to the game again.  It missed the boat for Cloud computing and has jumped in with both feet to catch up by answering with Windows 8 as their Cloud computer solution.   They must like to lead from behind. <br/><br/>What the technology sector needs is a reincarnation of Steve Jobs not shallow dweebs like Gates, Ballmer, or Zuckerberg. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Battle With Samsung Will Reshape The Smart-Phone Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1281191/comments?source=feed#comment-16419921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16419921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A few graduate courses in IT or a Computer Science degree and these GEEKs think they are smart enough to know what smart phones will survive the cut because only they are qualified to rule on the technology.  IT Geeks and Waterloo Grads should stay out of Financial, Advertising,  and Marketing and stick to their 1s &amp; 0s.  <br/><br/>Was BetaMax better than VHS?  Ask Sony.  Is UNIX better than Microsoft OSs?  Ask Apple, Sun Micro and Red Hat.  Who has the best Laptops?  Who has the better file servers.  Who has the best digital cameras? The answer is the best technology does not always win market's share.  It is the best marketing firm and the decisions of the management teams that drive financial growth and shareholder value not the GEEK squads locked in the basement playing with their subroutines saving 2 lines of code when the processor are approaching speed of light.  You don't need a CS degree to know that. Who turned these guys loose?  Are they making any money in this market?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A few graduate courses in IT or a Computer Science degree and these GEEKs think they are smart enough to know what smart phones will survive the cut because only they are qualified to rule on the technology.  IT Geeks and Waterloo Grads should stay out of Financial, Advertising,  and Marketing and stick to their 1s &amp; 0s.  <br/><br/>Was BetaMax better than VHS?  Ask Sony.  Is UNIX better than Microsoft OSs?  Ask Apple, Sun Micro and Red Hat.  Who has the best Laptops?  Who has the better file servers.  Who has the best digital cameras? The answer is the best technology does not always win market's share.  It is the best marketing firm and the decisions of the management teams that drive financial growth and shareholder value not the GEEK squads locked in the basement playing with their subroutines saving 2 lines of code when the processor are approaching speed of light.  You don't need a CS degree to know that. Who turned these guys loose?  Are they making any money in this market?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel And Qualcomm: The Moment Of Truth Is Near</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1068881/comments?source=feed#comment-16164411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16164411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Techy46... A word of advice. A retired software engineer should be smart enough to diversified his portfolio before a major market correct drives him back into the work force along with 15 million other Obama unemployed.  You should keep INTC.  It is yielding 4.17% and still has upside until at least $25.  You should dump the rest your tech holders and buy something in the commodities sector before interest rates begin to rise and eat your bank account.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:09:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Techy46... A word of advice. A retired software engineer should be smart enough to diversified his portfolio before a major market correct drives him back into the work force along with 15 million other Obama unemployed.  You should keep INTC.  It is yielding 4.17% and still has upside until at least $25.  You should dump the rest your tech holders and buy something in the commodities sector before interest rates begin to rise and eat your bank account.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Chinese government white paper has said China is "too dependent on Android," and accused Google (GOOG) of discriminating against some Chinese OS developers by delaying code sharing, as well as trying to limit their ability to do business. While the paper made no recommendations, analysts see it as an indication that China could be set to impose regulations on Android.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/866451?source=feed#comment-15893601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15893601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[China has not come far enough. Don't blame the west. The west did nothing to china.  It has been 4000 thousand years not a 100 for China to come around.  It is an alarming worldwide trend. Too much central government planning.  Too much interference and loss of individual freedom.  It is not just restricted to China.  It is a world wide trend that unfortunately will not end well for mankind.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:55:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[China has not come far enough. Don't blame the west. The west did nothing to china.  It has been 4000 thousand years not a 100 for China to come around.  It is an alarming worldwide trend. Too much central government planning.  Too much interference and loss of individual freedom.  It is not just restricted to China.  It is a world wide trend that unfortunately will not end well for mankind.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Chinese government white paper has said China is "too dependent on Android," and accused Google (GOOG) of discriminating against some Chinese OS developers by delaying code sharing, as well as trying to limit their ability to do business. While the paper made no recommendations, analysts see it as an indication that China could be set to impose regulations on Android.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/866451?source=feed#comment-15850081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15850081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Chinese government imposing regulations on an open architecture because they are not getting free access to the code quick enough seems like a stupid complaint.  What are their options for smart phone OSs?  Maybe should work on their silly alphabet more and produce something original in the arena of new ideas instead of stealing other people's content.<br/>1.6 billion people should have something more to contribute to mankind other then noodles and gun powder.  Maybe they should look to the Arabs.  They also have contributed much to civilization as Obama likes to tout.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:23:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Chinese government imposing regulations on an open architecture because they are not getting free access to the code quick enough seems like a stupid complaint.  What are their options for smart phone OSs?  Maybe should work on their silly alphabet more and produce something original in the arena of new ideas instead of stealing other people's content.<br/>1.6 billion people should have something more to contribute to mankind other then noodles and gun powder.  Maybe they should look to the Arabs.  They also have contributed much to civilization as Obama likes to tout.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Mobile Success Is Key Factor In Stock's 30% 1-Year Gain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1221691/comments?source=feed#comment-15508011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15508011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I can remember when Microsoft was late to the Internet party.  Netscape was eating their lunch. They purchased the rights to Spyglass Mosaic's browser in the late 90s for $3 million and then gave it away for free as part of Windows 95 platform.  It put Mosaic out of business and eventual destroyed market share for Netscape by 2000. <br/><br/>I hate Microsoft for many different reasons, but marketing strategy is not one of them.  Look at the ridiculous PE ratios of Amazon.  Yet it keeps up with  both the retail and the technology sectors.  Time will tell with Google.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I can remember when Microsoft was late to the Internet party.  Netscape was eating their lunch. They purchased the rights to Spyglass Mosaic's browser in the late 90s for $3 million and then gave it away for free as part of Windows 95 platform.  It put Mosaic out of business and eventual destroyed market share for Netscape by 2000. <br/><br/>I hate Microsoft for many different reasons, but marketing strategy is not one of them.  Look at the ridiculous PE ratios of Amazon.  Yet it keeps up with  both the retail and the technology sectors.  Time will tell with Google.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Dangerous Sign For Google's Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1211351/comments?source=feed#comment-15480791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15480791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/>adrian816...   Google could be doing a lot of things.  So could their stockholders.  Let Google do whatever they thing will stick and grow EBIDA.  Google admitted they missed the boat by not acquiring Twitter when it still as a start up.  Google needs to take risks, be bold and visionary to stay relevant in the technology sector.   Stockholders can weight in only one way.  Criticizing the management is not one of them unless you own a significant percentage of the stock.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:31:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/>adrian816...   Google could be doing a lot of things.  So could their stockholders.  Let Google do whatever they thing will stick and grow EBIDA.  Google admitted they missed the boat by not acquiring Twitter when it still as a start up.  Google needs to take risks, be bold and visionary to stay relevant in the technology sector.   Stockholders can weight in only one way.  Criticizing the management is not one of them unless you own a significant percentage of the stock.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The EU's antitrust probe of Google (GOOG +0.1%) is set to drag out to 2H12. "We can reach an agreement after the summer break. We can envisage this as a possible deadline," says antitrust chief Joaquin Almunia. He had previously been hoping for an earlier resolution. Like the FTC, which ended its probe last month, the EU has been investigating Google's inclusion of links to complementary services within search results, and controls over the exporting of ad campaign data. (privacy probe)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/846581?source=feed#comment-15410671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15410671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is no one that is an advocate of Freedom more then I. It is true that Google's business model and digital footprint is growing in the world.  On the hand who is this group of unelected bureaucrats called the EU that seems to have a claim on what is good for the European population?<br/><br/>Google and a free Internet is a challenge to their power and they are compelled to beat it back or control it in the name of antitrust or privacy conceived.  I am long Google.  I like the company as a stockholders and also have concerns of what the digital age means to the privacy and freedom of individuals worldwide.  I have a bigger concern when governments get in bed with companies like Google to dictate and control their business model in the name of the people's rights.  I am more concerned about the governments than the companies.  When they become one I am concerned about individual freedom.  Governments create nothing and control everything.  Who should we fear most? Who is in the best position to destroy your life? Google or Government?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:43:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is no one that is an advocate of Freedom more then I. It is true that Google's business model and digital footprint is growing in the world.  On the hand who is this group of unelected bureaucrats called the EU that seems to have a claim on what is good for the European population?<br/><br/>Google and a free Internet is a challenge to their power and they are compelled to beat it back or control it in the name of antitrust or privacy conceived.  I am long Google.  I like the company as a stockholders and also have concerns of what the digital age means to the privacy and freedom of individuals worldwide.  I have a bigger concern when governments get in bed with companies like Google to dictate and control their business model in the name of the people's rights.  I am more concerned about the governments than the companies.  When they become one I am concerned about individual freedom.  Governments create nothing and control everything.  Who should we fear most? Who is in the best position to destroy your life? Google or Government?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Dangerous Sign For Google's Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1211351/comments?source=feed#comment-15323211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15323211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sooo...  Would you join the herd if the stock split 4:1 and traded at $200?  The herd is not buying an $800 stock.  They are trading in BIDU.  The question is: Is GOOG worth a $800 and are there better places to put your money to return more than 20% should Google go to $1000.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:50:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sooo...  Would you join the herd if the stock split 4:1 and traded at $200?  The herd is not buying an $800 stock.  They are trading in BIDU.  The question is: Is GOOG worth a $800 and are there better places to put your money to return more than 20% should Google go to $1000.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Big Reason To Believe In Google's Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1211041/comments?source=feed#comment-15321911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15321911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Regarding this article and Google's future... The best American companies must have a nimble flexible management that can change directions quickly while still remaining visionary.  They should not be afraid to try new things to see how it is received by the end users or customers of the products and services.  The stockholders only care about long term growth, stock price, sector competition and better opportunities .  Google will remain relevant for the foreseeable future. I am still long and am on board for the ride.  <br/><br/>Amazon on the other hand is also an excellent company with the best retail business model on the Internet, but I ended my Amazon position.  I believe Amazon is currently over valued this level.  There are better opportunities elsewhere.  A 10% market correction and a different federal government would change my mind and offer new opportunities.  This is not exactly a &quot;Happy days are here again&quot; economy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:25:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Regarding this article and Google's future... The best American companies must have a nimble flexible management that can change directions quickly while still remaining visionary.  They should not be afraid to try new things to see how it is received by the end users or customers of the products and services.  The stockholders only care about long term growth, stock price, sector competition and better opportunities .  Google will remain relevant for the foreseeable future. I am still long and am on board for the ride.  <br/><br/>Amazon on the other hand is also an excellent company with the best retail business model on the Internet, but I ended my Amazon position.  I believe Amazon is currently over valued this level.  There are better opportunities elsewhere.  A 10% market correction and a different federal government would change my mind and offer new opportunities.  This is not exactly a &quot;Happy days are here again&quot; economy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Big Reason To Believe In Google's Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1211041/comments?source=feed#comment-15319631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15319631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Regarding Google splitting...  I also agree it would make Google stock easier to trade for the retail investors.  I suspect Google's reasoning against the move is that it really does not increase shareholder value and the underwriters, traders and bankers just get transaction fees for doing nothing.  <br/><br/>That said, Google does not have to be a Berkshire clone.  I think a $200 is a nice trading range for a Blue Chip want-to-be. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:52:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Regarding Google splitting...  I also agree it would make Google stock easier to trade for the retail investors.  I suspect Google's reasoning against the move is that it really does not increase shareholder value and the underwriters, traders and bankers just get transaction fees for doing nothing.  <br/><br/>That said, Google does not have to be a Berkshire clone.  I think a $200 is a nice trading range for a Blue Chip want-to-be. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In tandem with its Q4 report, CBS announced it plans to buy back $1B worth of shares in 2013, thereby nearly doubling its repurchase commitment for the year. The TV network/studio owner repurchased $299M worth of shares in Q4, and had $2.51B remaining on its authorization at year's end. On the earnings call, CEO Les Moonves said CBS is talking with Intel (INTC) about a programming deal related to Intel's upcoming Web-based TV service. (CBS Q4: I, II)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/830341?source=feed#comment-15024341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15024341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Intel entering into this space mystifies me.  I am still trying to understand the compelling case that will increase Intel's bottom line with this decision.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:22:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Intel entering into this space mystifies me.  I am still trying to understand the compelling case that will increase Intel's bottom line with this decision.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google (GOOG) discloses chairman Eric Schmidt plans to sell 3.2M Class A shares, or 42% of his stake in the company, over the course of 2013 through a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. The sale will encompass nearly 1% of Google's outstanding shares, and 3.2% of their voting power. (8-K)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/816641?source=feed#comment-14881681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14881681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Companies that do not pay dividends and trade side ways for years are worthless investments for retail investors.  These companies only exist for the convenience of the principles of the company to cash out at the expense of the capital markets and stupid investors.  However, It can benefit the traders if the trading range is large and consistent enough to play the game.  To this extent the game is not rigged.  It is the rules of the game.  For the stupid investor the game seems rigged.  The smart investors don't play this game.  They move one.<br/><br/>Management of growth companies MUST see to it that the stock price continues to go higher for shareholders.  This is the point of the game.  When it becomes a piggy bank for Senior Management it is time to get out.  I am still long Google.  I still believe in Google's management to keep Google a player in the coming changes in the future growth in technology sector.  Otherwise I am gone! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Companies that do not pay dividends and trade side ways for years are worthless investments for retail investors.  These companies only exist for the convenience of the principles of the company to cash out at the expense of the capital markets and stupid investors.  However, It can benefit the traders if the trading range is large and consistent enough to play the game.  To this extent the game is not rigged.  It is the rules of the game.  For the stupid investor the game seems rigged.  The smart investors don't play this game.  They move one.<br/><br/>Management of growth companies MUST see to it that the stock price continues to go higher for shareholders.  This is the point of the game.  When it becomes a piggy bank for Senior Management it is time to get out.  I am still long Google.  I still believe in Google's management to keep Google a player in the coming changes in the future growth in technology sector.  Otherwise I am gone! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motorola Won't Sink Google's Ship</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1170601/comments?source=feed#comment-14830691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14830691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just to weight in on a few of these comments.  Both Apple and Google are great companies that have and are still making significant contributions to the growth of technology world wide.  They have both made money for me.  I am proud they are rooted in American free market capitalism even if their management tends to lien a little left in political philosophy for my taste.  That said... it is not what school their founders are from that will determine their success.  It is very small minded to believe that.  It is the freedoms offered individuals here in this country to pursue one's passion, dreams, great wealth and along with it fame and great respect that drive these individuals to produce things and ideas that change the way the world lives and works.  It is freedom of talented individuals to pursue their ideas without government interference that is the key.  It is access to private capital and free markets that drives us all in seekingalpha.  This is not a sporting event or horse race and it is definitely not in pursuit of some misguided idea of economic fairness.  <br/><br/>Companies rise and fall all the time.  Some remake themselves and go on.  Others get acquired and become parts of other companies if their management teams can't duplicate the passion of the original founders.  What will bring them all down is interference.  Interference from small minded and corrupt politicians and bureaucrats both in the companies and in our government.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:51:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just to weight in on a few of these comments.  Both Apple and Google are great companies that have and are still making significant contributions to the growth of technology world wide.  They have both made money for me.  I am proud they are rooted in American free market capitalism even if their management tends to lien a little left in political philosophy for my taste.  That said... it is not what school their founders are from that will determine their success.  It is very small minded to believe that.  It is the freedoms offered individuals here in this country to pursue one's passion, dreams, great wealth and along with it fame and great respect that drive these individuals to produce things and ideas that change the way the world lives and works.  It is freedom of talented individuals to pursue their ideas without government interference that is the key.  It is access to private capital and free markets that drives us all in seekingalpha.  This is not a sporting event or horse race and it is definitely not in pursuit of some misguided idea of economic fairness.  <br/><br/>Companies rise and fall all the time.  Some remake themselves and go on.  Others get acquired and become parts of other companies if their management teams can't duplicate the passion of the original founders.  What will bring them all down is interference.  Interference from small minded and corrupt politicians and bureaucrats both in the companies and in our government.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
