Dr. Remulac's Comments Dr. Remulac's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/232508/comments Sirius XM Works Hard to Reduce February Debt http://seekingalpha.com/article/112007-sirius-xm-works-hard-to-reduce-february-debt?source=feed#comment-336403 336403 "...employed by us..."

Tyler, are you speaking as an employee or as a shareholder?]]>
Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:56:00 -0500 "...employed by us..."

Tyler, are you speaking as an employee or as a shareholder?]]>
Finally Some Good News for Sirius Shareholders http://seekingalpha.com/article/101407-finally-some-good-news-for-sirius-shareholders?source=feed#comment-288457 288457
There are bigger SIRI fish to fry. I would like to see Mel Karmazin step up to a microphone and state his exact plan to manage the debt. I no longer want to hear "We are working on it". There is no downside to making debt refinance plans public. Why is there nothing to dissuade shareholder fears? To be so quiet and aloof smacks of fear and deperation. I don't want to hear about cost savings (Show them to us! A few layoffs aren't too impressive), synergies (Nothing worth noting has been synergized!) and EBITDA (I want to know how much we'll make AFTER ITDA!).

Also, what's this crap mentioned in yesterday's BusinessWeek article ( www.businessweek.com/m... ) about DOUBLING the number of shares? That's kinda new! Anybody know what our shares will be worth if that gets approved? Doesn't mean much if you're holding from the upper ranges, but why continue to hold if you KNOW it's gonna get diluted?

This stock is going nowhere until investors' worries about the outstanding debt is satisfied. Period. They could say they made a buttload of money last quarter, layoff more employees and sell Howard Stern's hair on eBay for all I care. I want this debt paid down or refinanced to something feasibly manageable. Now. And I'm not voting to approve more shares to get there. Do it the old-fashioned way, Mel. Be the CEO. I don't want to be your buddy. Your exemplary past in this business no longer impresses me.]]>
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:02:04 -0400
There are bigger SIRI fish to fry. I would like to see Mel Karmazin step up to a microphone and state his exact plan to manage the debt. I no longer want to hear "We are working on it". There is no downside to making debt refinance plans public. Why is there nothing to dissuade shareholder fears? To be so quiet and aloof smacks of fear and deperation. I don't want to hear about cost savings (Show them to us! A few layoffs aren't too impressive), synergies (Nothing worth noting has been synergized!) and EBITDA (I want to know how much we'll make AFTER ITDA!).

Also, what's this crap mentioned in yesterday's BusinessWeek article ( www.businessweek.com/m... ) about DOUBLING the number of shares? That's kinda new! Anybody know what our shares will be worth if that gets approved? Doesn't mean much if you're holding from the upper ranges, but why continue to hold if you KNOW it's gonna get diluted?

This stock is going nowhere until investors' worries about the outstanding debt is satisfied. Period. They could say they made a buttload of money last quarter, layoff more employees and sell Howard Stern's hair on eBay for all I care. I want this debt paid down or refinanced to something feasibly manageable. Now. And I'm not voting to approve more shares to get there. Do it the old-fashioned way, Mel. Be the CEO. I don't want to be your buddy. Your exemplary past in this business no longer impresses me.]]>
Why Isn't There a Sirius iPod? http://seekingalpha.com/article/91551-why-isn-t-there-a-sirius-ipod?source=feed#comment-235505 235505 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:07:25 -0400 Why Isn't There a Sirius iPod? http://seekingalpha.com/article/91551-why-isn-t-there-a-sirius-ipod?source=feed#comment-235443 235443 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:15:53 -0400 Why Isn't There a Sirius iPod? http://seekingalpha.com/article/91551-why-isn-t-there-a-sirius-ipod?source=feed#comment-235427 235427
The only thing is, I suspect Slacker or Pandora are already working on such a service. And they may not need Sirius to deliver the content. They would get more global coverage by working with the mobile phone industry, which has more coverage. But if they could swing it with Sirius, they could add their content to the feature set.

Any way, THAT is what I would like to see. That is the device I would want for Christmas. Not an iPod that requires my constant attention, as the author here demonstrates.]]>
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:58:12 -0400
The only thing is, I suspect Slacker or Pandora are already working on such a service. And they may not need Sirius to deliver the content. They would get more global coverage by working with the mobile phone industry, which has more coverage. But if they could swing it with Sirius, they could add their content to the feature set.

Any way, THAT is what I would like to see. That is the device I would want for Christmas. Not an iPod that requires my constant attention, as the author here demonstrates.]]>
Jim Cramer's Unnecessary Beating Over Sirius http://seekingalpha.com/article/91772-jim-cramer-s-unnecessary-beating-over-sirius?source=feed#comment-234660 234660 Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:22:40 -0400 Why Did Adelstein Reverse His Position on the SIRI-XM Merger? http://seekingalpha.com/article/87021-why-did-adelstein-reverse-his-position-on-the-siri-xm-merger?source=feed#comment-214150 214150
I can appreciate that your comments are opinion and don't have to carry any burden for real proof. But really, you could've done better than to pander to a bunch of ticked-off shareholders (all 100 shares they account for). Look deeper and you may see more nefarious activity to report. This article is just a longer, more public version of a message board rant. Take a look at the rest of your comments on this article. Your fans of this article are the same all-caps crowd that posts this junk all day on Yahoo. No real substance. Just a keyboard vomit.]]>
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:57:09 -0400
I can appreciate that your comments are opinion and don't have to carry any burden for real proof. But really, you could've done better than to pander to a bunch of ticked-off shareholders (all 100 shares they account for). Look deeper and you may see more nefarious activity to report. This article is just a longer, more public version of a message board rant. Take a look at the rest of your comments on this article. Your fans of this article are the same all-caps crowd that posts this junk all day on Yahoo. No real substance. Just a keyboard vomit.]]>