The Secret Takeover of Lionsgate Films [View article]
the writer just doesnt get it. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FREE CASH FLOW IN THE MOVIE BUSINESS> WHAT THEY CALL FREE CASH FLOW IS LESS THAN OVERHEAD AND THE CONCEPT ASSUMES THEY DONT HAVE TO INVEST IN NEW FILMS>
On Nov 07 08:57 AM GoldDiggerAB wrote:
> "Mark Rachesky, has been a Lionsgate shareholder for 4 years, and > continues to gobble up shares as recently as today, where he went > over the 15% mark. " > > As of the mentioned form 4 below, Rachesky holds 7,391,634 shares. > > Total shares outstanding last quarter were 117,371,945. > That resuluts in an ownership of 8,68%. > That`s clearly under your reported figure. > 425,654 of this shares he bought AFTER the publishing of your article. > > > www.sec.gov/Archives/e... > > >
Lionsgate Entertainment: Misunderstood, Too Cheap to Ignore [View article]
Its obvious that you are CLUELESS. There is no such thing ad FREE CASH FLOW in the movie business. Its some artificial con job to keep you financial guys in copy
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedDow Chemical / Rohm & Haas Rhetoric Takes a Turn [View article]
The Secret Takeover of Lionsgate Films [View article]
On Nov 07 08:57 AM GoldDiggerAB wrote:
> "Mark Rachesky, has been a Lionsgate shareholder for 4 years, and
> continues to gobble up shares as recently as today, where he went
> over the 15% mark. "
>
> As of the mentioned form 4 below, Rachesky holds 7,391,634 shares.
>
> Total shares outstanding last quarter were 117,371,945.
> That resuluts in an ownership of 8,68%.
> That`s clearly under your reported figure.
> 425,654 of this shares he bought AFTER the publishing of your article.
>
>
> www.sec.gov/Archives/e...
>
>
>
Lionsgate Entertainment: Misunderstood, Too Cheap to Ignore [View article]