Can a Global Economy Be Managed One Nation at a Time? [View article]
Don't be too hard on the fellow, imagine what Al Gore would write on the subject !
On Nov 17 08:15 AM Mafeking wrote:
> What a dumb article. So this is the level of naive thinking that > a Wharton MBA gets you! We have a problem so let's regulate. Come > on Fred, there is a living breathing example of the incompetence > of 'global' organizations just down the road from you called the > UN. > > Following on from the Libyan representative being the head of the > Human Rights Commission at the UN perhaps the finance minister from > Zimbabwe can be in charge of the global financial situation.
Can a Global Economy Be Managed One Nation at a Time? [View article]
You folks actually scare me. So, lets go back to the same old fiasco, only lets make it a more regulated fiasco. Because poorly thought up globalization is what got into this mess. And you want more of it ? And to be sure we nail the coffin good, lets throw in some global regulation.
Unless you are an ostrich living with your head in the sand, or a theoretician in some ivory tower, it is pretty clear by now that an inequitable, mismanaged globalization is the culprit that bestowed the the 2008 crash upon us. How do you figure that a service economy can provide the kind of consumption that the US economy relies upon ? The crisis at hand, is the consequence of the decades long deterioration of the US consumer's purchasing power.
Paul Krugman + Al Gore = The Way Forward [View article]
It is not about caps, it is about finding an efficient alternative to fossil fuels. Capitalism will likely embrace something efficient, thus profitable. The trouble is that Gore is full of hot air, not solutions. The natural consequence of this rabid environmentalism, which is a hodge podge cocktail of snake oil, based on a repressed Malthusian and neoludite ideology is a a contraction of humanity. Not something that is acceptable to most. There is little chance of this seeing the light of day with Obama, simply because it is hogwash. Every time you turn on the light, it is reality check. It works. But I guess in some minds there is perpetual darkness.
Google: 3Q Results Reveal Chinks in the Armor [View article]
Sadly, as a company grows its management ossifies, if not becoming outright sclerotic Kind of hard to understand which part of "you can't cut your way to growth", don't they understand !
Of course fear is not a strategy, but what is wrong with prudence? I mean, the government is not even seeing and acknowledging the problems of this economy, consequently they are far removed from doing anything effective.
There is nothing wrong with cash and gold, they are eroding much slower than the markets.
Bailout 1.1 Passed. Will We Have to Go Back to the Well for v2.0? [View article]
All this is empty talk.. You nailed one thing right, solvency. How can an outsourced economy be solvent ? It is time to pay the fiddler. For the majority I see two choices. They will riot, or they will learn to live to third world standards. The wise guys were claiming that this is not a consumer driven economy. Perhaps so, but then what can you expect from people that cannot exercise basic logic.
Today's Federal Action Will Alter the Face of Finance [View article]
...where all you were when too many US citizens were buiyng something they couldn't afford? Wasn't that also "financial socialism"? -
And why couldn't they afford it ? Where did most of the well paying jobs go ? If someone thinks that there can be an economy based on flipping hamburgers, I pity them. Well it can, but most of us will not like the adjustments that have to be made. Anyway this government intervention is a lame attempt to prolong the agony and save some political necks.
Today's Federal Action Will Alter the Face of Finance [View article]
great day to get some put options -
Sssssssssh... idle moaning about the moratorium on shorting. Most of you people are not Bubba Beerbely, come election time cough up some money, and make the pigs pay.
This is not a catastrophe, not such a terrible crisis. A crisis of the fat boys on Wall Street, may be. Look at the difference between SPY and IWM. Never mind TGT. Should tell you a lot. Let the bums pay for their mistakes, hopefully investors will keep management on a shorter leash.
Are the Basic Principles Still Relevant? [View article]
"Describing the financial meltdown as a matter of imprudent lending is not 20-20 hindsight."
Indeed, and I am a pessimist since very few are ready to face reality. It is not lending, or the housing market woes.
It is is the Basic Principles that are still relevant. Namely we have a culture, and worse an economy based on debt. To an extent debt is fine, but overwhelming levels of debt driven massive loss of well paying jobs do to a misunderstood "globalisation", and the afferent pressure on wages is insanity. Or at least it is temporary insanity to think that one can have a healthy economy as a consequence. The rest is the rubbish of the fast talking heads.
May be in the future.... right now with a few notable exceptions (5-6 major tickers) ETF comparative volume, that would justify this as a fact, is rather sparse.
Obama, McCain and Offshore Drilling [View article]
They are both long on rhetoric, and short on common sense. I was saddened that even Paris Hilton can be more thoughtful on the issue, than the presidential candidates we are stuck with.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedCan a Global Economy Be Managed One Nation at a Time? [View article]
On Nov 17 08:15 AM Mafeking wrote:
> What a dumb article. So this is the level of naive thinking that
> a Wharton MBA gets you! We have a problem so let's regulate. Come
> on Fred, there is a living breathing example of the incompetence
> of 'global' organizations just down the road from you called the
> UN.
>
> Following on from the Libyan representative being the head of the
> Human Rights Commission at the UN perhaps the finance minister from
> Zimbabwe can be in charge of the global financial situation.
Can a Global Economy Be Managed One Nation at a Time? [View article]
Unless you are an ostrich living with your head in the sand, or a theoretician in some ivory tower, it is pretty clear by now that an inequitable, mismanaged globalization is the culprit that bestowed the the 2008 crash upon us. How do you figure that a service economy can provide the kind of consumption that the US economy relies upon ?
The crisis at hand, is the consequence of the decades long deterioration of the US consumer's purchasing power.
Consumers Buy Into Disinflation [View article]
Paul Krugman + Al Gore = The Way Forward [View article]
Google: 3Q Results Reveal Chinks in the Armor [View article]
Fear Is Not a Strategy [View article]
There is nothing wrong with cash and gold, they are eroding much slower than the markets.
Bailout 1.1 Passed. Will We Have to Go Back to the Well for v2.0? [View article]
Today's Federal Action Will Alter the Face of Finance [View article]
And why couldn't they afford it ? Where did most of the well paying jobs go ? If someone thinks that there can be an economy based on flipping hamburgers, I pity them. Well it can, but most of us will not like the adjustments that have to be made.
Anyway this government intervention is a lame attempt to prolong the agony and save some political necks.
Today's Federal Action Will Alter the Face of Finance [View article]
Sssssssssh... idle moaning about the moratorium on shorting. Most of you people are not Bubba Beerbely, come election time cough up some money, and make the pigs pay.
Bring Back the Uptick Rule [View article]
Who Will Bail Out the U.S. Government? [View article]
Market Nosedive Pushes Dollar Down [View article]
Are the Basic Principles Still Relevant? [View article]
Indeed, and I am a pessimist since very few are ready to face reality. It is not lending, or the housing market woes.
It is is the Basic Principles that are still relevant. Namely we have a culture, and worse an economy based on debt. To an extent debt is fine, but overwhelming levels of debt driven massive loss of well paying jobs do to a misunderstood "globalisation", and the afferent pressure on wages is insanity. Or at least it is temporary insanity to think that one can have a healthy economy as a consequence. The rest is the rubbish of the fast talking heads.
ETFs: 'The' Trading Tool [View article]
Obama, McCain and Offshore Drilling [View article]