SA Editor Rachael Granby's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/234601/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/159343/comments?source=feed#comment-656152 656152 Thanks, Nautis. The ticker has been duly corrected.

~R.G.


On Sep 01 07:54 AM Nautis wrote:

> Marvel is MVL not MRVL.]]> Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:54:34 -0400 Thanks, Nautis. The ticker has been duly corrected.

~R.G.


On Sep 01 07:54 AM Nautis wrote:

> Marvel is MVL not MRVL.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/156277/comments?source=feed#comment-631594 631594 Mdpath-

Nice catch! The stock symbol has been duly corrected.

Thanks,
R.G.


On Aug 16 09:35 AM mdpath wrote:

> The symbol for Dentsply is XRAY not xra.]]> Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:43:51 -0400 Mdpath-

Nice catch! The stock symbol has been duly corrected.

Thanks,
R.G.


On Aug 16 09:35 AM mdpath wrote:

> The symbol for Dentsply is XRAY not xra.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/154229/comments?source=feed#comment-617917 617917 Ginchinchili-

Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I will definitely consider including it next quarter.

~R.G.


On Aug 06 09:49 AM ginchinchili wrote:

> Rachael Granby: You guys always leave out EnerSys, who released earnings
> yesterday after close and beat estimates by $0.08. This is the largest
> industrial battery maker in the world, an American company with a
> market cap of $962 million. Please start including them among your
> "notables."]]> Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:43:41 -0400 Ginchinchili-

Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I will definitely consider including it next quarter.

~R.G.


On Aug 06 09:49 AM ginchinchili wrote:

> Rachael Granby: You guys always leave out EnerSys, who released earnings
> yesterday after close and beat estimates by $0.08. This is the largest
> industrial battery maker in the world, an American company with a
> market cap of $962 million. Please start including them among your
> "notables."]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/146156/comments?source=feed#comment-568638 568638
Great catch! Thanks for pointing out the typo!

~R.G.


On Jun 30 11:06 AM NormK wrote:

> You have a typo in the top of your article. The symbol for Enterprise
> Products Partners is EPD, not EPE.]]> Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:59:54 -0400
Great catch! Thanks for pointing out the typo!

~R.G.


On Jun 30 11:06 AM NormK wrote:

> You have a typo in the top of your article. The symbol for Enterprise
> Products Partners is EPD, not EPE.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/128880/comments?source=feed#comment-448860 448860
The numbers are from a Bloomberg article. Here's the link: www.bloomberg.com/apps...

~R.G.


On Apr 02 05:20 AM Cliff Wachtel wrote:

> Good summary and info, thanks
>
> RE: Amounts spent on US stimulus and how that compares to GDP and
> other benchmarks mentioned:
>
> Curious, where do you get these figures? I'd like to see the sources.
> thanks, Cliff]]> Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:22:29 -0400
The numbers are from a Bloomberg article. Here's the link: www.bloomberg.com/apps...

~R.G.


On Apr 02 05:20 AM Cliff Wachtel wrote:

> Good summary and info, thanks
>
> RE: Amounts spent on US stimulus and how that compares to GDP and
> other benchmarks mentioned:
>
> Curious, where do you get these figures? I'd like to see the sources.
> thanks, Cliff]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/126115/comments?source=feed#comment-427378 427378

On Mar 16 08:58 AM Annualgain wrote:

> BCS is actually up 14.3% in the premarket, not down.]]> Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:03:20 -0400

On Mar 16 08:58 AM Annualgain wrote:

> BCS is actually up 14.3% in the premarket, not down.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/123798/comments?source=feed#comment-412186 412186
I hear your skepticism.

The stats are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, for January 2009.
Here's the link:

www.bea.gov/newsreleas...

-R.G.


On Mar 03 11:40 AM axelrod608 wrote:

> >> "Personal income increases. Personal Income increased 0.4% ($44.8B)
> (vs. -0.2% consensus); disposable personal income rose 1.7%..." >>
>
>
> Rachael - source ? Time period ? I find this hard to believe,
> given what has been happening in past months and the past quarter.
> We're putting 600,000+ out of work each month and income is rising
> ?
>
> Government numbers are increasingly suspect..]]> Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:21:15 -0500
I hear your skepticism.

The stats are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, for January 2009.
Here's the link:

www.bea.gov/newsreleas...

-R.G.


On Mar 03 11:40 AM axelrod608 wrote:

> >> "Personal income increases. Personal Income increased 0.4% ($44.8B)
> (vs. -0.2% consensus); disposable personal income rose 1.7%..." >>
>
>
> Rachael - source ? Time period ? I find this hard to believe,
> given what has been happening in past months and the past quarter.
> We're putting 600,000+ out of work each month and income is rising
> ?
>
> Government numbers are increasingly suspect..]]> http://seekingalpha.com/news/market_currents/post/17963?source=feed#comment-393179 393179

On Feb 18 08:22 AM Tony Petroski wrote:

> Tries in vain.]]> Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:26:32 -0500

On Feb 18 08:22 AM Tony Petroski wrote:

> Tries in vain.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/119107/comments?source=feed#comment-379634 379634
The chart above is of BHP share movement on the NYSE. The 52-week high was $95.61 and Friday's closing price was $45.44.

-R.G.


On Feb 08 02:57 AM maxe wrote:

> BTW, im not sure what is up with your graph, but BHP was never $90
> and is not currently $45.]]> Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:03:46 -0500
The chart above is of BHP share movement on the NYSE. The 52-week high was $95.61 and Friday's closing price was $45.44.

-R.G.


On Feb 08 02:57 AM maxe wrote:

> BTW, im not sure what is up with your graph, but BHP was never $90
> and is not currently $45.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/113604/comments?source=feed#comment-348464 348464
The ISM report indicated that the non-manufacturing sector improved slightly from the previous month. However, a sub-50% reading indicates sector contraction. So, a slower rate of contraction in December brought activity to 40.6%.

-Rachael


On Jan 07 09:38 AM ChipSeal wrote:

> "Economic activity in the non-manufacturing sector increased by 3.3%
> in December to 40.6%, according to ISM, better than the 37.0% consensus."

>
>
> Whoo Hoo! A counter trend move! The sector is GROWING... right? But
> the very next sentence in your "news" is:
>
> "This marked the third month in a row of sector contraction, though
> the rate slowed slightly."
>
> So it is growing and contracting at the same time? Are you just making
> this stuff up? Do you even read what you write?
>
> Please do better, Mrs. Granby.]]> Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:51:07 -0500
The ISM report indicated that the non-manufacturing sector improved slightly from the previous month. However, a sub-50% reading indicates sector contraction. So, a slower rate of contraction in December brought activity to 40.6%.

-Rachael


On Jan 07 09:38 AM ChipSeal wrote:

> "Economic activity in the non-manufacturing sector increased by 3.3%
> in December to 40.6%, according to ISM, better than the 37.0% consensus."

>
>
> Whoo Hoo! A counter trend move! The sector is GROWING... right? But
> the very next sentence in your "news" is:
>
> "This marked the third month in a row of sector contraction, though
> the rate slowed slightly."
>
> So it is growing and contracting at the same time? Are you just making
> this stuff up? Do you even read what you write?
>
> Please do better, Mrs. Granby.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/101094/comments?source=feed#comment-287727 287727
Thanks for your comment and attention to detail.

Baker Hughes' earnings have now been corrected in Wall Street Breakfast.

-R.G.]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:11:16 -0400
Thanks for your comment and attention to detail.

Baker Hughes' earnings have now been corrected in Wall Street Breakfast.

-R.G.]]>