Cash for Clunkers May Cost Up to $45,354 Per Vehicle [View article]
Are you for real ....."His arguments are like the ones Bush made going into Irag." We were attached on 9-11 or did you forget about 2900 plus people that died that day! Please don't go there. As far as "this program!" Take a look at Germans Program that is really close to this one .....It was suppost to be a one time thing and I think there in there third year of there program! It don't work. The Government needs to get out of the peoples way..... Let the weak companys fail . lower capital gain tax, and taxes in general. Period.
On Jul 31 01:43 PM dancingdad wrote:
> Avery must be a republican because he does math like one. His arguments > are like the ones Bush made going into Iraq. First note he said 200,000 > low mileage cars are traded in a normal 3 month period. ( I'm willing > to bet a large percentage of the clunkers coming in are high mileage > ones.) He then assumes that all the clunker cars replace all the > normal trades (bad assumption). His faulty logic leads him to conclude > that 222,000 clunkers - 200,000 normal trades so we get 22,000 additional > trade activity for $1B. All wrong, all worst case assumptions, typical > republican BS.
Cash for Clunkers May Cost Up to $45,354 Per Vehicle [View article]
Are you for real ....."His arguments are like the ones Bush made going into Irag." We were attached on 9-11 or did you forget about 2900 plus people that died that day! Please don't go there.
As far as "this program!" Take a look at Germans Program that is really close to this one .....It was suppost to be a one time thing and I think there in there third year of there program! It don't work.
The Government needs to get out of the peoples way..... Let the weak companys fail . lower capital gain tax, and taxes in general.
Period.
On Jul 31 01:43 PM dancingdad wrote:
> Avery must be a republican because he does math like one. His arguments
> are like the ones Bush made going into Iraq. First note he said 200,000
> low mileage cars are traded in a normal 3 month period. ( I'm willing
> to bet a large percentage of the clunkers coming in are high mileage
> ones.) He then assumes that all the clunker cars replace all the
> normal trades (bad assumption). His faulty logic leads him to conclude
> that 222,000 clunkers - 200,000 normal trades so we get 22,000 additional
> trade activity for $1B. All wrong, all worst case assumptions, typical
> republican BS.