Seeking Alpha

Konst » Comments » SIRI

  • Positive Cash Flow Signals New Era for Sirius XM [View article]
    wow, a true believer in a truly piece of sh-t investment, the only thing this article has in terms of content are lame sports analogies, good day to you sir. the hype is over, it was over a few years ago
    Nov 07 00:48 am |Rating: +4 -8 |Link to Comment
  • Stifel Lowers Sirius Estimates on Weak Auto Sales [View article]
    bailout money? why does this company deserve bailout money, so you can get your penny stock speculative "investment" back? what a joke
    Oct 31 03:11 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Stifel Lowers Sirius Estimates on Weak Auto Sales [View article]
    Mel's buying more shares should not be construed as a positive signal. He's been wrong every time he's bought sirius stock. plus he doesn't need the money. the moral of the story: don't make a stock the object of a cult following
    Oct 31 03:07 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Wienkes, Merrill Weigh in on Sirius  [View article]
    moondragon64, you are an idiot. sirius is no google for many reasons. the main one is that it bleeds money, whereas Google makes tons of it. there is no conspiracy, it's just a shitty company and a shitty stock, notice I didn't say shitty product, the product is ok, but by no means is groudnbreaking or game-changing. it's one way, and importantly, an exorbitantly expensive way to deliver information, and now there are cheaper way to do it, but If they get their financing things might improve for the short term
    Oct 20 11:55 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Is a Reverse Split in the Cards for Sirius? [View article]
    This company needs a new business model. And you all SIRI shareholders should bring a class action lawsuit against Sirius Buzz and Tyler Savery. You probably don't have a case because their fine print, I am sure says that their shit-pumping atrocities are not be construed as investment advice. Regardless, that sucks ass. Mel is a senile moron like John McCain, except dumber and more senile. He is not apt to compete in the current business environment, he is an old-school radio guy and he is done. Unfortunately, its seems like this company's value may be almost entirely wiped out. Could be wrong though. Hope I am, for those still holding shares.
    Oct 18 03:34 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sirius Shares Priced Like Stamps [View article]
    investment tip for 1 month ago:
    1) take money out of stock market
    2) put under mattress

    -too bad only hindsight is 20/20
    Oct 10 14:55 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How the Rescue Plan Affects Sirius [View article]
    Siriphone, well-played sir. Wow, it must suck to be affiliated with "sirius buzz", you know, pumping a stock that has been so bad for shareholders. The lesson, ignore the hype, or use it in a contrarian fashion. You know what I mean. Shit, I should be doing stuff and not wasting my time reading this bullshit.
    Oct 03 11:15 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sirius XM On the Rise - Does Microsoft Want a Piece? [View article]
    sl62,
    2005-2008 was a different situation. At that time it was a hype stock (like Rimm was 2 months ago). There were also some catalysts that people had high hopes for, such as signing Howard Stern.
    Such catalysts are unlikely to come and it is no longer seen as a game-changing, paradigm-shifting blah blah blah company.

    So, you are right that a stock can trade at a very high P/E multiples when it's hyped, but that time for Sirius is past. Most importantly, becaue it is not new anymore. So at this point, it's about earnings. But hey, I could be wrong.

    As far as the price back then vs. now, it's also not comparing apples to oranges for another very important reason: significant share dilution from then to now.
    Sep 28 21:21 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sirius XM On the Rise - Does Microsoft Want a Piece? [View article]
    the price from 2005- 2008 is not that relevant to today's price. Most importantly, because management has been diluting shareholders the whole time. look at the market cap, not the price
    Sep 28 21:09 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sirius XM On the Rise - Does Microsoft Want a Piece? [View article]
    actually, may be the share price does NOT reflect that it's going bankrupt. Maybe 2.5 billion is only a slight discount to what this company is currently worth.
    Sep 27 13:38 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sirius XM On the Rise - Does Microsoft Want a Piece? [View article]
    Let's face the facts. The companys' share price reflects investors' notion that the company is going bankrupt. That is the risk. What is the potential reward? Hard to tell. Right now the company is worth 2.5 billlon, (and that's what's relevant not sub Dollar Tree share price). Their revenue is going to be about 2 billion, based on the recent past performance of the 2 comapnies. If the company starts turning a profit, they will probably make 10% profit on the revenue, based on somewhat similar businesses. That's 200,000 million a year. With a PE of 10 that would mean the company may be worth 2 billion, with a rather high PE of 20, it would be worth 4.00 billion. For the kids who can't do basic math and focus on the f--cking share price, that would warrant a price of 1 dollar and 12 cents, with a PE multiple of 20 and the ASSUMPTION that they are turning a profit. The big if is if they survive without filing for bankruptsy and wiping out all shareholders. How's that for sirius buzz?
    Sep 27 13:35 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don't Believe Everything You Hear About Sirius [View article]
    as I said, 1.82- 2.75, a gambling profit, the fundamentals of the business do not warrant a positive stock price, this stock has been moving on hype waxing and waning since it became public, shareholders have negative equity,

    and again, I am not angry, I actually made made money on this dubious stock. By the way, if they straighten out their financing and begin to have a positive cash flow, it may be a good stock at that point.
    Sep 22 15:37 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don't Believe Everything You Hear About Sirius [View article]
    You did not "play", at this point it's speculation, and you got lucky. I did not really have a bad experience with this stock. I netted positive overall. That is not my point. I think the practice of pumping stocks is misguided and detrimental. What is sad, is when you disregard the facts:
    -money losing business
    -heavily in debt
    -competition that emerged which puts the business model's viability at risk
    -management which is oblivious and or helpless to creating shareholder value
    -radio us kind of over, it was replaced by TV

    but hey, nothing wrong with speculation, I suppose, if you accept the risk,
    anyway, the whole siriusbuzz and similar phenomena irk me,

    Good luck everyone, but analyzing the fundamentals and the competition is probably a safer idea than luck
    Sep 22 15:32 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don't Believe Everything You Hear About Sirius [View article]
    ha..hareholders, I meant shareholders
    Sep 20 00:57 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don't Believe Everything You Hear About Sirius [View article]
    ok, as far as "overdeliver". Mel doesn't know "shareholder friendly" from a hole in the ground. It's unfortunate that they have so much debt and are cash flow negative, but hey, that's the reality. Credit ratings, cash flow, earning, and, Market Cap, not the stock price. 1$ ain't what it used to be with all the dilution. I feel for y'all, having been a Sirius shareholder twice. But bankruptsy is no fun for a company's hareholders, vis a vis some of the events of the past 10 days.

    These f--ckers like Tyler, pumping this s--t are unequivocally worthless scum. Stocks are to be evaluated, not pumped.

    Good luck
    Sep 20 00:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on SIRI by Konst
Comments by Ticker
Konst's
Comments Stats
39 comments
Rating: -5 (5 - 10 )