I'm a holder of AAPL but only since this summer or so.
1. They will need to do something with the cash. No question. More than likely it'll be a combination of acquisitions (more deals similar to PA Semi) and potentially a buy-back. (If you liked it at $200, you love it at $90 especially with short-term rates where they are.) Expecting a long-term return of 8-10% from here would not be crazy.
2. The current environment begs for accounting rigor, not arbitrary non-GAAP earnings. However, I think the iPhone contribution should be highlighted and broken out on a non-GAAP basis without the deferral. Keep in mind though, the deferred revenue story is at least partly baked in already because it's been discussed a fair amount.
3. Pancreatic cancer is highly lethal. I lost my father to it one month after he was diagnosed. That being said, I think Steve would hang it up if he was told he was going out feet first in a short time.
4. Over the last six months, there have been 8 insider sales for a total of 6% of the stock held by the group. There have been 0 insider buys. Call me when the number reverses.
5. It might go up... but will it outperform??
One thing I might add, Apple has ZERO debt. It's probably "breathed a sigh of relief" a few times knowing there was no refi risk. I would think that lack of debt risk in today's market would get the company some kind of equity premium. Or maybe that's why the stock isn't at $70...
What Are Some of the Best Hedge Fund Managers Doing? [View article]
Keith,
Thanks for the yeoman's work. Can you point to more information about the correlation between EEM and GLD? Seems counter-intuitive to me. Unless you're suggesting that Short EEM (or long EEV) and GLD are correlated?
Five Apple Predictions for 2009 [View article]
1. They will need to do something with the cash. No question. More than likely it'll be a combination of acquisitions (more deals similar to PA Semi) and potentially a buy-back. (If you liked it at $200, you love it at $90 especially with short-term rates where they are.) Expecting a long-term return of 8-10% from here would not be crazy.
2. The current environment begs for accounting rigor, not arbitrary non-GAAP earnings. However, I think the iPhone contribution should be highlighted and broken out on a non-GAAP basis without the deferral.
Keep in mind though, the deferred revenue story is at least partly baked in already because it's been discussed a fair amount.
3. Pancreatic cancer is highly lethal. I lost my father to it one month after he was diagnosed. That being said, I think Steve would hang it up if he was told he was going out feet first in a short time.
4. Over the last six months, there have been 8 insider sales for a total of 6% of the stock held by the group. There have been 0 insider buys. Call me when the number reverses.
5. It might go up... but will it outperform??
One thing I might add, Apple has ZERO debt. It's probably "breathed a sigh of relief" a few times knowing there was no refi risk. I would think that lack of debt risk in today's market would get the company some kind of equity premium. Or maybe that's why the stock isn't at $70...
Good piece.
What Are Some of the Best Hedge Fund Managers Doing? [View article]
Thanks for the yeoman's work. Can you point to more information about the correlation between EEM and GLD? Seems counter-intuitive to me. Unless you're suggesting that Short EEM (or long EEV) and GLD are correlated?
Thanks.