bonae

Google: The Next Ponzi Scheme to Fail?

The evolved species (the small survive, Darwin) doesn't fight over the last piece of cheese on the sinking ship, they find the open porthole and a piece of wood for a raft.

Watch the ship sink from the shore, drinking corona's and a cheese platter, with all the other small mice that ignored the drowning rats for a safe shore where small business is welcome

Google: The Next Ponzi Scheme to Fail?

"Rats gather in the bow of a sinking ship"
-wisdom of jimi

I don't know about whether seeing an apparent injustice by an internet trust is a strong enough reason to short their stock, though I have not checked the chart to see what the institutions are doing.

It is interesting to see that Dr. Eric Schmidt was attending Aspen meeting with major media executives who know full well he is under Anti-Trust Investigation. It would be nice to see those executives who spoke with Schmidt Subpoenaed to appear in an FTC Court on the issue of anti-trust and internet media search trust. Though it is quite clear to see that in the world of fantastic poor judgment Google is King and the last effort to 'Crush' all the 'little guys' is beginning in earnest. Forget that there is a recession and US Small Business is the next to require a Trillion Dollar Federal Bailout and the news industry in general has already been largely destroyed by Google but apparently when Google needs a few more pennies, damn the world, they shall have a few more pennies.

Personally, I think Seeking Alpha is the new Wall Street Journal and a little attack by petty Google to try to destroy an up-in-comer who allows 'not-pro-google' views on its comment board is going to damage Google Management and draw more into the investigative fray of Google's embattled Board of Directors than any harm Google will do to Seeking Alpha.

I advise you to call on Microsoft and ask for more money and a three year contract. When you get it, and you will, then advise all others that are with Google ad sense to do the same.

Don't let their dominant Network Effects Monopoly intimidate you into a cowards corner - fight them by leaving.

Microsoft I understand is rolling out a professional welcome mat to those who are tired of dealing with all the 'we're smarter than you so go eff yourself' juvenile delinquents over at the googleplex.

Rat's gather in the bow of a sinking ship.

In the case of google, they fight over the last piece of cheese.

Google is the worst bunch of A-Holes to ever have a share sold in the US Public markets and a disgrace upon Every American. Kissing them goodbye is pulling up the anchor that has been holding you down.

so...

eff 'em, move on and make even more money with Microsoft.

We've all had enough of Google's BS and even if the US Senate has all been greased with shares, we're sure as hell not going to stand for this sh&t anymore.

Google's Eric Schmidt on the New World

Regulations assure standards of integrity, these are abscent in much of the operational internet business models. The comments fail to cast a critical view on Google's own anti-competitive business practices with regard to its 'information wants to be free doctrine' and its own efforts to expend influence in maitaining the basic premis of its business which is selling advertising off views of property which is not compensated nor created by Google.

The News Industry is a good example of the need for modern internet regulations to assure entrepreneurial innovation within the information access space dominated by Google's network effects monopoly.

Google needs to be strictly regulated on Property, Privacy and Compensation issues. Though its model is very good for google, it has proven little value to entrepreneurial innovation and American Competitiveness in the Global Information Economy.

His advice is some of the worst ever offered in the field of entrepreneurial innovation and his efforts mark quite contrary goals of corporate avarice by Google.

The US needs a Civilian Department of Internet Regulation similar to the FCC with a new strong piracy enforcement arm with prosecutorial police power that levels the playing field between the modern innovator and the corporate network effects monopolist's interests.

As an entrepreneur I disagree with Dr. Schmidt who makes a strong academic argument based upon a false premise. The present, ("Might makes Right internet environment") which favors Google's platform is no longer in the National Interests or in the interests of US Leadership in Innovation.

Google's relative control in search traffic and Dr. Schmidt's large investment in continuance of that network effects monopoly make him a highly inappropriate presidential advisor in this regard.

His laudable academic credentials are just that, academic credentials which have proved in mathematical studies to be poor projections of entrepreneurial success. As the most highly paid corporate manager in History, Dr. Schmidt should not be looked to as an entrepreneur, he quite simply - is not.

Google Looks Beyond Smart Meters for Home Energy Data

It would also provide an 'ideal' network for criminals to determine when individuals are not home so they could systematically 'rob their homes'. Google does not consider security issues with regard to individual privacy and is inappropriate for such systems. The US Government might better legislatively address internet privacy before Google comes up with anymore hair-brained ideas that harm American's Security through unlimited intrusion into privacy.

Some individual information should not be 'open-source' as that becomes instantly monitored for weakness by foreign intelligence systems.

I don't want China and Russia knowing when my lights are on.

But that's just common sense which is apparently lacking in Google Management.

Google Looks Beyond Smart Meters for Home Energy Data

Considering recent discoveries of internet spying and hostile programs left behind in the power grid, Google should not be allowed anywhere near a home power meter and should have no device allowed access to any information contained in the power grid.

A Terrorist could obtain massive amounts of metering data through Google's ad based system and use that information against individuals security interests. Allowing Google access to such data could provide a back door to upsetting critical infrastructure.

Asside from Terrorists, it appears China has strong relations with Google Managment and most Power-Grid based Spying is from China. It is not surprizing that Google is seeking to compromise American's Security by offering such data in an unprotected context over their open platform. Google has also argued that NASA which houses many defense secrets that could be used for Missle Guidance, be more open. China has also been spying at NASA.

Google's platform is entirely wrong for such things and opens more security risks than benefits.

This is quite simply a bad idea.

Intuit: How To Improve Cloud-Computing Safety

The similarity between an online broker who operates in a highly visible sharing of market information and cloud computing is pretty accurate, except that Stock Brokerages and Banks are highly regulated, cloud computing companies and their use of information are not.

Intuit: How To Improve Cloud-Computing Safety

Users should wait to move significant amounts of information into the Cloud Computing world until privacy regulation is established and a government firewall to hostile espinage (cyber attack) and corporate espionage (Cyber Burning) by competitors. The public is unaware of the dangers in cloud computing and until privacy is protected, significant amounts of data or operations in the cloud cause a Severe Security Risk to the Small Business and expose your data to (Data Farming) by Advertising (and Competitors) who use the advertising relationship to gather Competitive Intelligence.

Does Google Have an Organic Growth Problem?

Google, Inc. in seeking dominance in areas of new media has recently entered into endangering legal precedents governing US Intellectual Property and Brand Identity, this activity together with Yahoo's Yang's recent appology to the compromise of a dissident in Communist China is calling into question if Google, Inc. has the Social Maturity as a Major Corporation in the United States to take excessive market share through the partnership with the other industry leader Yahoo. Google is displaying inappropriate conduct towards the property of their USERS and ADVERTISERS through legal behaviors unbecoming to a US Corporation. These Legal Behaviors are supportive of Confiscation of Intellectual Property for monetization by Google/Yahoo Partners which has openly displayed Sensitivity to Communist over Democratic Philosophy and Values. This will impair Google/Yahoo's standing in US Information Security Management and will be the primary cause in Advertisers to seek out competing search products with greater basis and grounding in American ideals and maturity of managements in ethical conduct. The Google/Yahoo Partnership might ultimately defeat both companies to new innovative competitors with higher standards of ethical conduct with US Citizens Intellectual Property as Google fights over their 'Fair Use' Right to Confiscate Value in US Intellectual Property on which their Advertisers Brand Identity is wholly dependent to sell 'key words' to their competitors. Ultimately US Corporations will recognize this Indifference to the Core Rights and importance of Branding to Products as a Grave and Gathering Threat to the profits of US Companies by Google/Yahoo Partners. The ultimate result will be an Advertiser BACKLASH against Google/Yahoo Partners immature management decissions by major Ad Customers and damage to intellectual property ownership and use precedents recognized by US Information Security Agencies. Thereby causing immediate imparment to both Google/Yahoo Partners and their ability to further grow and potentially retarding long-term growth metrics with grave permanence.