After careful review, it seems ECRI was not surprised by the recession as some have tried to suggest.
On Sep 07 09:16 AM fotokemist wrote:
> Thanks to all for an enlightening post and discussion. I am new to > this game and continue to be amazed at the quality of information > and discussion available on the web. > > If memory serves, Steve posted something in February or March from > ECRI predicting improving business conditions by summer (pardon my > laziness for not digging this up.) My point is that somewhere there > is an ECRI report from six months ago for each month. > > Could one of you folks much more experienced than me do an assessment > of how they have been doing recently? > > I am among the group that is concerned that the level of government > interference compared to earlier events may have had an adverse effect > on their models. Given my poor understanding of cause and effect > in the current environment, any knowledge of their models, etc., > I would find some current "calibration data" very helpful. > > Steve, thanks again for all your effort.
-
This blog post (see link below) chronicles links to more complete ECRI public statements from Jan. 2008 - Mar. 2008 regarding recession:
Sep 07 10:37 am
|Rating:
+2
0
All Comments by Owen B »What if It Is a 'V' Recovery? [View article]
kirklindstrom.blogspot...
After careful review, it seems ECRI was not surprised by the recession as some have tried to suggest.
On Sep 07 09:16 AM fotokemist wrote:
> Thanks to all for an enlightening post and discussion. I am new to
> this game and continue to be amazed at the quality of information
> and discussion available on the web.
>
> If memory serves, Steve posted something in February or March from
> ECRI predicting improving business conditions by summer (pardon my
> laziness for not digging this up.) My point is that somewhere there
> is an ECRI report from six months ago for each month.
>
> Could one of you folks much more experienced than me do an assessment
> of how they have been doing recently?
>
> I am among the group that is concerned that the level of government
> interference compared to earlier events may have had an adverse effect
> on their models. Given my poor understanding of cause and effect
> in the current environment, any knowledge of their models, etc.,
> I would find some current "calibration data" very helpful.
>
> Steve, thanks again for all your effort.